Crysi wrote:Didn't realize YWS was getting so serious.
The fact that half the time, people on YWS aren't serious enough when critiqing is part of why YWS hasn't reached its full potential. Just take a look at any piece around here; most of the replies will be near to useless. "WOW, this was gud!" "Nice job, I wanna read more!"
when you post pieces on YWS, generally you're looking for critiques so you can improve it.
Generally? Always.
Oh, and Galerius: people write for different reasons. Yes, some focus on communicating some truth to the audience. Some also focus on entertaining people, or simply bringing the audience into a make-believe world. Actually, I write for all of these reasons, and have examples of each. But writing should always be enjoyable! Once you start writing just to make a profit, you lose the craft. At some level, you should always have a little fun with it.
Thanks for proving my point, I suppose. All of your examples stated what I had said in the beginning - that any type of intelligent writing is written for someone else to make them understand what you think and perceive...unless the poet is completely selfish. Furthermore, when you post your writing on a web site for critiquing, the assumption is that you want others to read it and the piece isn't only for "yourself".
ThienThienThien, I apologize for turning your thread into a debate but I had to correct some dangerous misunderstandings (in my opinion). If you seriously want a critique of this piece, let me know. Somehow I don't think you do.
