The Sons of Liberty, Please Review!

5 posts
User avatar
Gender None specified
Points 4166
Reviews 189
so I wrote this for school. It's going in our permanent portfolios, so I want it to be uh, really good. Right? So please give me a few pointers. My family is not the best at grammar, and I want help before I turn this in...feedback more than welcomed...yes, I did try to make it interesting.



The Sons of Liberty


If you had lived in mid-eighteenth century Boston, you might have heard of them. The Sons of Liberty were a group of men at the time. They met to discuss politics and what the members could do to influence them. These people were mostly fishermen, sailors, blacksmiths, butches—people who had little if any say at all in society. With that in mind, consider their reactions to the tea taxes, Townshend acts, and stamp acts.
Already impoverished people now had to pay higher prices for goods that had never been cheap. These outraged colonists made up the ranks of the Sons of Liberty. Organized by the influential-and radical Bostonian—Samuel Adams, they usually met late at night in an abandoned distillery. There, and under the branches of the Liberty tree, an imposing elm where the group sometimes met, began the bold plans for revolution.
While today we praise all efforts made towards gaining independence, the views of that time were quite different. Estimates show that up to a third of colonists were Torries, or Loyalists who whole-heartedly obeyed the British crown, and Parliament. Another sizeable portion of the population was neutral. The Sons of Liberty knew their opponent was infinitely larger, and more respected than they were. I don’t know whether it was sheer rage that drove them onwards, but something gave these men the enormous necessary courage to fight. They often haunted storefronts, urging customers to abstain from buying tea or overpriced cloth and sugar. Sometimes wooden picket signs were driven into the yard of an offending merchant’s store, warning people that they sold the heavily taxed items. However, many other protests were more destructive, some even violent. Some groups made cloth dummies representing tax collectors and burned them in public, along with banners cursing the man’s family. Another tactic was mobbing. Angry Sons of Liberty would storm the homes of stamp or tax collectors and break in. They’d storm into the yard, smashing out windows of expensive glass with stones. If they managed to get inside, they’d raid the home, taking as many valuables as possible. Paintings would be ripped from their frames, furniture trampled and destroyed, the silverware stolen, and crockery broken. In one instance, even shingles were torn from the roof of a stamp collector’s house. Due to such blatant actions, some historians have begun to call this group of radicals terrorists.
Despite the questionable nature of their methods, it must be admitted that the Sons of Liberty played a crucial role in the efforts of our revolution. When British troops marched on Lexington and Concord, they were met by a mob of defiant colonists whom fully intended to keep their stockpiled weapons. This arousal was initiated by members of the Sons of Liberty, including Paul Revere, who rode through the night to warn the townspeople of the advancing troops. There was another skirmish which the group was responsible for. At the Battle of Golden Hill, a group of British troops and some members of the Sons of Liberty fought out a dispute over the soldiers’ actions.
Beyond this, there is little documentation regarding this group’s involvement in the rising of the Revolutionary War. However, I feel sure that these radicals, having been the ones to spark the spreading flames of revolution, were among the most eager to join Washington’s new army.
.........
Please, I humbly beg of you--critique me out the door! ;) --Voxina

*Title edited by Kitty15: please don't use full caps in any part of your title.*




User avatar
Gender None specified
Points 4166
Reviews 189
I really need some help on this... *sighs* no reviews yet. But at least a few people have looked at it... It's not even that long, either...




User avatar
Gender Female
Points 890
Reviews 95
This is pretty good. I never try at all on school papers, so this is great compared to what I do.
I'd say maybe add a section or two of action. Just throw some random flash-backs in there, ya know?
Umm...grammar and spelling checked out okay to me, but they're aren't exactly my strong points.
I do believe, however, that in the first paragraph you meant "butchers."

Sorry I couldn't be of more help.
-Jocelyn.
"The difference between the right word and almost the right word is the difference between lightning and the lightning bug." -Mark Twain




User avatar
Gender Female
Points 890
Reviews 45
Hiya Vox! I've come to rescue you and make sure that this piece of work is "uh, really good". :P This review will probably be very picky, but... well, you asked for it! ;)

These people were mostly fishermen, sailors, blacksmiths, [s]butches[/s]

Butchers.

people who had little, if any say at all in society

Add in the comma to make this read better.

There, [s]and[/s] under the branches of the Liberty tree, an imposing elm where the group sometimes met, began the bold plans for revolution.

I think that this line could be improved by getting rid of the 'and'. However, if I've read this sentence wrong, please tell me and I can alter which word to take out. :)
This is a great way to begin talking about them though - congrats. Definately makes me want to read the rest of your essay.

They often haunted storefronts, urging customers to abstain from buying tea or overpriced cloth and sugar.

This is a sentence is really nicely done; you sound like you know exactly what you're talking about, and you also involve the reader emotionally. You're quite the essay writer D:

Due to such blatant actions, some historians have begun to call this group of radicals terrorists.

I had to read over this a few times to 'clock' what you meant; but I get it now. However, if you want people to get it straight away, considering putting quotation marks around the word 'terrorists', like I've just done. That way we can see that 'radicals terrorists' are actually two seperate words, not a phrase. There's nothing wrong with this sentence at all, though, so no sweat.

Beyond this, there is little documentation regarding this group’s involvement in the rising of the Revolutionary War. However, I feel sure that these radicals, having been the ones to spark the spreading flames of revolution, were among the most eager to join Washington’s new army.

Such a brilliant conclusions! *applause* Well done there, dude!

That's it - that's the pickiest I could get. This is amazingly well written. *sniffles* I'm so proud of you! *sob*

Anyway, I'm gonna stop acting like a geek and go review someone else's work now. I want to be a writer, and yet I get my kicks critiquing. Something's not right in that balance ;)

Much love, hun <3
Ja-!
~ Mnes x




User avatar
Gender None specified
Points 1781
Reviews 143
Hi vox! :D
Don't worry— help is on the way! *zooms in*

vox nihili wrote:The Sons of Liberty


If you had lived in mid-eighteenth century Boston, you might have heard of them. The Sons of Liberty were a group of men at the time. They met to discuss politics and what the members could do to influence them. These people were mostly fishermen, sailors, blacksmiths, [s]butches[/s] butchers—people who had little if any say at all in society. With that in mind, consider their reactions to the tea taxes, Townshend acts, and stamp acts.

Already impoverished people now had to pay higher prices for goods that had never been cheap. These outraged colonists made up the ranks of the Sons of Liberty. Organized by the influential-and radical Bostonian Samuel Adams, they usually met late at night in an abandoned distillery. There, [s]and[/s] under the branches of the Liberty tree (an imposing elm where the group sometimes met) began the bold plans for revolution.

While today we praise all efforts made towards gaining independence, the views of that time were quite different. Estimates show that up to a third of colonists were Torries, or Loyalists who whole-heartedly obeyed the British crown, and Parliament. Another sizeable portion of the population was neutral. The Sons of Liberty knew their opponent was infinitely larger, and more respected than they were. [s]I don’t know whether it was sheer rage that drove them onwards[/s] Perhaps it was just sheer rage, but something gave these men the [s]enormous[/s] necessary courage to fight.

They often haunted storefronts, urging customers to abstain from buying tea or overpriced cloth and sugar. Sometimes wooden picket signs were driven into the yard of an offending merchant’s store, warning people that they sold the heavily taxed items. However, many other protests were more destructive; some even violent. Some groups made cloth dummies representing tax collectors and burned them in public, along with banners cursing the man’s family. Another tactic was mobbing. Angry Sons of Liberty would storm the homes of stamp or tax collectors and break in. They’d [s]storm[/s] trample the yard, smashing out windows of expensive glass with stones. If they managed to get inside, they’d raid the home, taking as many valuables as possible. Paintings would be ripped from their frames, furniture trampled and destroyed, the silverware stolen, and crockery broken. In one instance, even shingles were torn from the roof of a stamp collector’s house. Due to such blatant actions, some historians have begun to call this group of radicals terrorists.

Despite the questionable nature of their methods, it must be admitted that the Sons of Liberty played a crucial role in the efforts of our revolution. When British troops marched on Lexington and Concord, they were met by a mob of defiant colonists whom fully intended to keep their stockpiled weapons. This arousal was initiated by members of the Sons of Liberty, including Paul Revere, who rode through the night to warn the townspeople of the advancing troops. There was another skirmish which the group was responsible for. At the Battle of Golden Hill, a group of British troops and some members of the Sons of Liberty fought out a dispute over the soldiers’ actions.

Beyond this, there is little documentation regarding this group’s involvement in the rising of the Revolutionary War. However, I feel sure that these radicals, having been the ones to spark the spreading flames of revolution, were among the most eager to join Washington’s new army.



Here are a few things I changed and want to expand upon:
1. In paragraph 3, I reworded your sentence because in reports, it is best to abstain from referring to your own personal opinion (this is a mistake I myself make sometimes) or expressing your own thoughts on the subject. Remember: this is a report about facts, not what you think about it.
2. In paragraph 4, I subsituted the word 'storm' for 'trample'. This is simply because you used the word 'storm' to describe the actions of the Sons in the previous sentence. Try not to use the same verbs more than once, especially in back-to-back sentences.
3. Obviously, I broke up the report. You write very well, but I think you should definitely work on dividing up your ideas more clearly. (These paragraphs are still longer than average, but that is not a bad thing! Especially if this is an important graded assignment!)

Overall:
You made the Revolution come alive again! I love the way you write non-fiction. You are able to captivate the reader just as much as you could if you were writing fiction.
Very nice work! Let me know what you get on this!


*anti-pop
...Bitter cold, it grows
changing holds
cynicism the new norm...

-Libretto



When a flower doesn't bloom, you fix the environment in which it grows, not the flower.
— Alexander Den Heijer