Bram Stoker's Dracula

5 posts
User avatar
Gender Female
Points 5890
Reviews 410
I finally finished this book a week ago after having to stop and start all the time.

I really loved parts of it - some of the characters were so vivid and the book was very well written. However, I found that the ending was a massive let down and the last four chapters dragged a bit as they were fairly repetitive.

Anyone else read it? Thoughts?

Alainna
xxx
Sanity is for the unimaginative.

Got YWS?




User avatar
Gender Female
Points 6235
Reviews 2631
A friend recommended it to me a few weeks ago actually. Is it worth reading? Does the good outweigh the bad?
Writing Gooder

~Previously KittyKatSparklesExplosion15~

The light shines brightest in the darkest places.




User avatar
Gender Female
Points 5890
Reviews 410
It's absolutely worth reading - the whole subject of the vampires really hooked me.

The good do outweigh the bad in my eyes.

xx
Sanity is for the unimaginative.

Got YWS?




User avatar
Gender Male
Points 890
Reviews 39
I might have found the book an exciting read if I had read it one hundred years ago.

I forced myself through it because, hey, it's Dracula.

And yes, the ending was a huge anti-climax.




User avatar
Gender Male
Points 3965
Reviews 152
AS most modern vampiric are drawn from stokers research and imgination, the book is definitely worth reading simply to see where it all originated, and to grasp how more modern authors have adapted *classical* vampire myths and interpretations to suit their needs.

I like the narrative style, of journal entries, as it really tells a story and explains that telling as it does, while switching seamlessly between narrators.

Again, anticlimax was a let down
So you're going to kill a god. Sure. But what happens next?

Diary of a Deicide, Part One.


Got YWS?



Brain freezes are temporary, but milkshakes are forever.
— SilverNight