Hey there.
I've got a fair mix of technical and interpretation details to cover here.
First off, flow.
In poetry, flow is going to be affected by a lot of things and the issues within this poem, is based a lot on the structure and the punctuation. I could actually stretch that farther to say capitalization since it is semi inconsistent to the style that's being developed here.
1. The structure needs changing for the issue of flow and for the ease of the reader. A common issue I find in people new to writing poetry is wanting to group all those ideas together, and assure that the reader knows it's one solid idea. Except this is poetry and each poem has a base theme that's established earlier on. Any sub idea established through a stanza is allowed to be split because it recognizes the different parts of the poem and also clears up confusion.
--> Further explanation of last point: clears up confusion by making the poem easier to digest, and therefore better feedback on what the base idea is. if they reader can't get down to the message because of roadblocks along the way, they're most likely not going to get the point.
2. Now you don't necessarily need to use stanzas. Well it would be nice to have 2 stanzas, rather than one big hunk. What I was thinking of structurally was making the line length more uniform. Whenever I see lines jutting out all over the place, it puts me off a bit from reading the rest of the poem, just because I know it will most likely be hard to get through.
3. That being said, it did take me some effort to get through this poem and when I reached the end, I wasn't particularly impressed by the message. It just feels like another sappy romance poem and that's not always a bad thing, it's just further hurt by the execution. If you want this poem to be perhaps more dramatic and emotional, the solution comes in imagery.
So overall, it's an okay start.
Needs work, with the message and the structure.
Happy revmo.
- lizz
Points: 650
Reviews: 766
Donate