Wild World
For as long as I can remember, I’ve always had this feeling that I was somehow missing out on life; that I’ve always been a little too late for, well just about everything.
The minute I get somewhere, the party’s over. They’ve all moved on while I’m still trying to cling on to the last remnants of their excitement, their eagerness for life.
There are times when I sit in a subway for hours on end, just watching. Watching the endless stream of people coming and going, getting on and off with this certain confidence that I so greatly admire and lack. They all seem to know where they are going, having had their next few steps of life carefully planned out. The exceptions, of course, are those blundering tourists, who always seem to get out a stop too early or too late. But even they seem to have a final aim or destination that seems perfectly clear to them.
But not I. Is it wrong that I don’t know where I am going, that I seem to be wandering aimlessly without a vantage point, without knowing where it’ll all end? Not that I don’t have any dreams or ambitions, but they seem so feeble, so unimportant compared to the expectations of today’s society, that I just don’t bother chasing them.
And anyway, do those people I see in the streets every day really have a goal, or are they just as lost as I am and are putting on a show for the benefit of their friends and family. Pretending to have a purpose, to assure them, or even themselves.
But if that is so, why are they not sick like me, of playacting their lives. Do they not crave to break out of their daily routines?
I seem to have been watching life from afar. Through a window, or even binoculars.
Never quite sure if I was missing out or if this is exactly what life is meant to be.
And so I wander on, through this dull, dull world. Not living, just existing.
Until him, that is.
I was sitting on a bench on Primrose Hill overlooking London’s streetlights.
It was drizzling slightly and dawn hadn’t yet broken, so the park was empty.
A pigeon was pecking at my shoe where a few crumbs of a sandwich lay. Exhausted from a long night up I sat there in a melancholic stupor.
I hardly noticed him sitting down next to me until he started talking. He didn’t say hello, or introduce himself. He just… talked. While he did so, I felt his eyes search me a few times, but there was no need for me to look at him. I just stared ahead and let his deep, gravelly voice wash over me. It felt good for once not having to be pressed for information, till he knew everything about my dull life, not that it ever took very long to tell. I was content just to listen. And somehow I felt it did him good too, as if all his life he had just waited for someone to hear him out. He talked about everything. But mostly he talked of himself. Of his passions and dreams, his failures and achievements. He simply talked about life. And with each word his voice seemed to become more animated, more excited. I was engrossed by his ideas, infected by his enthusiasm. His dreams seemed as mundane as mine at first. They were too. But somehow he hadn’t lost his way yet. He was still bothering to chase them, no matter how fruitless it sometimes seemed.
And it began to dawn on me, just like the sun was dawning on London, it wasn’t about achieving your dreams, but about the struggle to reach them. Living isn’t about basking in your luck. There’s nothing interesting in that. You cannot appreciate the happy ending of a story without the struggle that led to it. The adventure is not the happy ending.
He had fallen quiet for a few minutes, suddenly depleted of words. Then he turned to me again and I could feel his radiant smile, just like one feels the first sun of spring.
“Why is it”, he then asked me, “that sometimes it is so much easier to talk to strangers than to your loved ones?”
I pondered it for a while, then, clearing my throat I answered: “Because they see us for whom we are and not how they expect us to be”.
There was a slightly awkward silence. Somehow, through my talking, the moment between us had been lost. And I was left to grapple with the loss, saddened to have ruined it.
He stood up abruptly and I expected him to walk away without another word. But instead he took my chin into his rough hands, making me look straight into his eyes. Then he turned away and walked slowly down the slope, slipping occasionally on the wet grass, without a backwards glance, looking determinedly straight ahead.
His eyes were the only feature I had taken in of him. And they left me rigid, paralyzed on the damp bench.
I don’t even remember their colour. Just their fierce look, so lively, so bright. Eyes, that had seen so many wonders and so much calamity.
Eyes, that had looked upon a wild world.
Points:
Time spent:
IP address:
Canary word: Present
Possible AI signals:
Original Text:
Are you sure you want to delete this comment? This cannot be undone.
Mark this comment as a review? Points will be awarded to the poster.
Your comment was posted, but it wasn’t long enough to count as a review. Reviews need about four complete sentences (at least 250 characters). Try writing another review that explains your thoughts in more detail — the author will appreciate it, and you’ll earn points for it.
Hi Skermitz! Love the name! Ha! Okay, since most of the reviewing tools are down, I'll give a simply presented Editor's Note. Info on my 'types' of reviews can be read at my clinic; check my signature for a shortcut to my Critic Clinic.

Firstly, though, I would like to say that your short story is set nicely on a good point of discussion. I love the way you described the scenery; it brought a great imagery. The story was satisfying. but expanding the story and idea of the piece would do great as it adds up to your defense and message.
So, just for clarity, the, I mean The, Editor will critique the overall grammar of your work:
"
One of the first things I noticed with your work is 'glue'. These are words that are constantly used, and using them once more can make an article uninteresting. You used phrases like 'get somewhere', (can be replaced with 'arrive elsewhere' etc.) always been (can be 'constantly been' and a lot more. You can replace them with phrases that are not to deep of a word and are not to common. This makes it an interest to read!
Also, I noticed you used words like 'really' and 'very'. I think you should rather use words that are more extreme than the word you're trying to extend with the words 'really' and 'very'. Like 'very long'. You can replace it with 'lengthy' or 'extensive' or outstretched'.
Lastly, please avoid passive verbs in describing situations unless they happen very slowly and dramatically.
x
The Editor
"
Okay, so that's what The Editor says. It's good on its own, and so change it to strengthen it, not to weaken it. Do your best and this piece can be one of the best!
Good luck writing!
Your pal,
Al
AAAAAAAAH! Why did it post like this!? where are my paragraphs!!! Help someone, I really don't get this new yws!!!
It's fixed now, don't worry. It's just a small bug!
I must disagree with my esteemed colleague alfredsymon. I think "arrive elsewhere" and "constantly be" would detract from the candid, conversational tone, "arrive elsewhere is less direct,it wouldn't be your intuitive word choice confiding to a friend. It is a question of context.
I liked the opening, you can play around with shortening it if you wish, just as a matter of grace, to me it didn't drag. My main issue is that you do not seem to trust your prose or dialogue, you are describing the description of something, which can be effective (ie. if on a winters night a traveller) but in this case, it says to me, "I am not a good enough writer to write dialogue that will have this effect on you. I am not good enough to make you feel what I feel" AND YOU ARE GOOD ENOUGH, you are more than good enough. Same goes for the very obvious foreshadowing, "until him", show us. Let it happen to us the same time it happens to you. You can, I know you can.
Hey guys, thank you soooooooo much for the feedback! But I need to get a few things straight! You see, English is not my first language, I haven't been speaking it for over 6 years and the only way I'm keeping it in tact is by reading... So could you (Kit) please quickly explain what you mean by describing the description?
Do you mean I should use more direct speech? Or that I should write in the present tense? Sorry, but I really want to take your feedback into full account, so I'd be glad if you could clarify that for me! =)
Thank you so much for reading and replying, it means a lot to me...
cheers Skermitz!
I guess a simpler way of putting it would be "show don't tell".