a prologue of my first story

prologue

The program was meant to make our soldiers better,stronger,smarter,and even more deadly. But like everything else some stuff was meant to fail. The program was created by our governments top scientists. But the government didn't want word to fall out that this program did exist. The reason behind this was that our nations enemies weren't supposed to find out. Every scientist was assigned a part of the program once that task was finished the government terminated the person. But then it happened One enemy spy had infiltrated the program and discovered what was happening and let the nation know. But he wanted revenge and destroyed the program and kept some of it for him self. Then the government thought that the program was done and kept it for later use. But the spy had left and started to tell people. The nation was divided into two sides. One side was under the command of the spy who had told people about the program, and the other side was under the command of the original nation and thought that the other side were liers and bad people. And that is how the war started.

Comments & reviews · 5
Note: You are not logged in, but you can still leave a comment or review. Before it shows up, a moderator will need to approve your comment (this is only a safeguard against spambots). Leave your email if you would like to be notified when your message is approved.

User avatar
kaitlyn
Review
kaitlyn wrote a review · Tue Mar 29, 2022 9:19 pm

Good Morning/Afternoon/Evening/Night(whichever one it is in your part of the world),

Hi! I'm here to leave a quick review!!

Anyway let's get right to it,

The program was meant to make our soldiers better,stronger,smarter,and even more deadly. But like everything else some stuff was meant to fail. The program was created by our governments top scientists. But the government didn't want word to fall out that this program did exist. The reason behind this was that our nations enemies weren't supposed to find out. Every scientist was assigned a part of the program once that task was finished the government terminated the person. But then it happened One enemy spy had infiltrated the program and discovered what was happening and let the nation know. But he wanted revenge and destroyed the program and kept some of it for him self. Then the government thought that the program was done and kept it for later use. But the spy had left and started to tell people. The nation was divided into two sides. One side was under the command of the spy who had told people about the program, and the other side was under the command of the original nation and thought that the other side were liers and bad people. And that is how the war started.


Okayyyy...well I have to say first up, before I even get into the content here, this is a little bit of a blob of text here. This could do with at least being broken into two paragraphs because right now the way its structured just makes it quite difficult for us to read it here and that really isn't a good thing to have especially in something like a prologue.

Moving on into the actual situation here, I have to first say this isn't really a prologue here. This is maybe a bit of a premise at best or like a synopsis, but it may as well also be pretty a much a plot summary here. You've just sort of included everything that is meant to happen in a story into this tiny paragraph which isn't really how prologues work here. They need to be an actual scene.

Besides that particular set of issues though, what you do have here is a pretty intriguing piece. I do find myself curious as to what is going on here and it does seem like the sort of premise you could build a story around. Its just that right now in trying to be a prologue this piece kind of fails.

Aaaaand that's it for this one.

As always remember to take what you think was helpful and forget the rest.

Stay Safe
Harry

User avatar
Kate.Grace
Review

To be honest, I didnt really understand most of what you were talking about. Its very confusing when it probably doesent need to be.

Why not say something like:

"One man infiltrated an enemy government to recover a secret programme.
A programme that could make soldiers faster, stronger, smarter and even deadlier than before.
But upon discovery that the programme didn't even exist, one man revealed the secret and divided a nation.
That is how the war started."

Its a lot simpler, and a lot easier to follow. I think you'll find that you can get your point across more with fewer, shorter scentences that are well structured. You dont need to make it so complicated.

Good Luck - keep writing.

User avatar
jok101
Review
jok101 wrote a review · Sat Aug 01, 2009 8:08 pm

Okay so your third review. I thought it was alright it was a bit too short and rushed to get a feel for the story. With that kind of history I think it would go better if you included it in the story. Not all together either, so that it keeps the
reader guessing and wondering. At the beginning of the prologue it seems a bit cliched, super soldier, have to keep it secret. The idea of a spy finiding it out and dividing the nation into civil war is much more original and intreasting and saves the idea. This idea is good and it would be intreasting to see how it turns out. Are you going to post any of the chapters for it? PM me if you do I kinda want to read them.

User avatar
Alec Laine
Review

sdogg117 wrote:But like everything else some stuff was meant to fail.

I would change "stuff was" to "things were", it would sound more dramatic.

sdogg117 wrote:Every scientist was assigned a part of the program once that task was finished the government terminated the person.

I would divide this sentence into two, putting a punctuation after "program".

sdogg117 wrote:And that is how the war started.

This is an excellent end to a brilliant prologue, and throws us into the story right away. The prologue is interesting, and isn't too long to discourage us from reading it. It gives us the information we need as a background for the story, and got me curious to what this program might be. I would love to read more. Let me know when you post the first chapter. (If you are going to post it)

User avatar
Hippie
Review
Hippie wrote a review · Sat Aug 01, 2009 9:43 am

Welcome to YWS. Here's your first review.


The program was meant to make our soldiers better,stronger,smarter,and even more deadly.

The concept of this first sentence is good because it raises the question, "What is the program? What does it involve?"
You've got some punctiation errors though - to be precise, commas need spaces after them. Also, with short lists, 3 tends to be the magic number. I'd scrap "better" because it's general and the other three things cover it anyway.

But like everything else some stuff was meant to fail.

1. Sentences can't start with "but" or "and"
2. I'd put this on its own line because it sounds quite important

government's


But the government didn't want word to fall out that this program did exist. The reason behind this was that our nations enemies weren't supposed to find out.


1. The "but" thing again.
2. I'd scrap the whole "the reason behind this was that" part. It's implied, and shorter sentences have more impact than long rambling ones.

Every scientist was assigned a part of the program. Once that task was finished, the government terminated the person.

Corrections in bold

[s]But[/s] Then it happened. One enemy spy [s]had[/s] infiltrated the program and discovered what was happening and let the nation know.


1. You know what
2. This would be a good place to start a new paragraph.

But he wanted revenge and destroyed the program and kept some of it for him self. [s]Then[/s] The government thought that the program was done and kept it for later use.


1. I guess "but" sounds okay here. It isn't technically correct, but it's okay to bend the rules sometimes if it sounds allright.
2. Himself is one word

But the spy had left and started to tell people.

1. Note that you can change the previous full stop with a comma to make the "but" correct. Don't make a habbit of it though, because two short sentences are generally more effective than one long one.

One side was under the command of the spy. [s]who had told people about the program, and[/s] The other side was under the command of the original nation and thought that the other side were liers and bad people.

1. "bad" is quite nonspecific. In what way did they think they were bad.
2. Liars, not Liers

[s]And [/s]That is how the war started.

This would be better on its own line.

Hope that was a satisfactory first review.

Jeff



"would you still love me if i was a worm" yeah babe i would AND id get you your own compost bin so we could enter gardening competitions together
— Corvid