Dang. I almost thought that I already reviewed this, but apparently not! This is Nikayla here dropping in for a review.
The first thing that I noticed about the poem is that it's divided up into three different stanzas. I can see how you got inspiration from Silverhanded's poem as it is similar in structure. I'm not the biggest fan of the "Rachel" definition part as you don't really define anything until the first stanza. If you were going to go for one of those poems that describes something with the usage of a definition, I would have liked to see it formatted more similarly to that? Just a little bit of a thought.
With the first stanza, something that confused me a little bit is the number of days. It's not something that someone else would look up, but it came up for me to 16 years and some days instead of 15, which is what the author claims their age is. This is only something nitpicky, but I'm wondering why it doesn't match up? Did you research the number, or did you just pick one at random? Moving on from this, the "and" in the second line feels unnecessary and disrupts the flow of the poem, so I suggest you take it out.
I'm not that fond of the last two lines of the first stanza as it doesn't really do anything new and sort of singles out this "you" figure in the poem. It particularly frustrates me because you don't mention "you" anywhere else in the poem, and you abandon them there in the first stanza. Is "you" a romantic interest? A father? Someone else? I want more context as to who they are, and if you're going to use "you", I suggest that you be more consistent with it because if you're only going to use it once, I suggest taking it out as a whole because it's not worth confusing the reader.
In the second stanza, I was a little confused throughout. Particularly, I'm pointing to "an anesthetic to the absence". The absence of who, and why does the speaker miss them? Delving further than that, I didn't find the semicolon to really connect the second and third lines. You go from being in your mind to being in 'the garden'. Something that I'm not really a fan of are words used just to use them. I'm not saying that you can't have a strong vocabulary, because you can, but don't use words just because you think it makes your writing sound prettier. I'm rather fond of the last line because it holds a lot of emotional weight behind it, but I'd like to see you rework the three lines before that to have them make more sense and have more context behind them.
For the third stanza, I hold most of the same problems that I had in the second stanza. The wording in the first line feels a little awkward, particularly with "suppose i am delusional". You can already see that I'm not the biggest fan of this poem compared to your others, and that's because it feels a little pretentious, though I'm sure you didn't mean to come off that way. I'm a strong believer in that works don't have to have fancy words to sound or be pretty, and I think that's why I prefer your other poems over this. Another thing that I felt that lacked in this poem is imagery. I find that there's a fine line in-between using unique words and having strong imagery, and I think this shows that.
You don't really describe much here, and instead the piece goes off on a bit of a ramble. I do have to say that I liked the part about the smoothies and I'd like to see more of that. It makes it feel more sincere. I'm not a large fan of the ending itself, because it leaves me wondering the meaning of the piece. What did you intend to get across? It's something that I found to be a little blurry, and with that, I would have liked to see more of a focus on that. Give it more of a focus, and give it some polishing like Silverhanded said, and I think this would be stronger. It's different from your usual style, and with that comes experimenting.
I hope I helped and have a great day! If you have any questions, feel free to ask!
Points: 220
Reviews: 1081
Donate