Hi there! I saw chapter 3 up in the sci-fi section and figured it made sense to go back and look at chapter 1. The title really intrigued me.
This is a fun start, making for both an interesting scene in and of itself and also giving promise for some excitment down the road. The idea of a dragon guarding a tree and protecting apples is a refreshing take on dragons. It's nice to get away from the old cliche of hoarding treasure or something like that. I also actually really like that the character had a moment of weakness/cowardice at the end, because it makes him (her?) seem human. I could definitely understand feeling the way he did.
I found myself confused at first, because there's not a lot of context. The question of "What's this about a women with an apple?" was a good start, but wore thin when I couldn't quite figure out what was going on or why. I like the imagery, especially the sound of the apple bite. I got distracted, though, wondering what significance this woman had to the MC, or what the apple was about, or where we were, etc. Once it got explained I was like "Oh, okay," but up until then I was struggling. I think it would make for smoother reading if there was some small explanation, or maybe even just bread crumbs, to give a sense of place and time and purpose. Even at the paragraph about the dragon, I was thinking, "How does the MC know this? Is it something about the apple he recognises?" Because of all this, I felt a little left out of the loop, eg even though we were in the character's head, I felt like I didn't get to hear all his thoughts.
There's a lot of beautiful imagery and a good arc to the scene (solid beginning, middle, and end, I'd say). You might consider looking closely at your adverbs and the more vivid adjectives, and maybe cut a couple, because there's quite a few. Personally I find using too many strong words can actually end up diluting their impact; I prefer placing just a few in strategic spots where I want to draw the reader's attention. Also, as far as adverbs go, I often find if I remove them, the meaning isn't lost, because the verb is pretty good on its own. (I've often said that verbs are our most powerful tools as writers, but that's a whole speech on it's own haha) An example is "slowly dawning" - reading the sentence using only "dawning," I take away the same meaning. And imo, if a word/sentence can be removed without affecting anything, it should be! Fewer words means you're being more precise.
Alrighty, onward to chapter 2! Or maybe tomorrow, but I definitely want to read on one way or the other. Cheers.
Points: 23295
Reviews: 264
Donate