Published December 6, 2010
....
Points:
Time spent:
IP address:
Canary word: Present
Possible AI signals:
Original Text:
Are you sure you want to delete this comment? This cannot be undone.
Mark this comment as a review? Points will be awarded to the poster.
Your comment was posted, but it wasn’t long enough to count as a review. Reviews need about four complete sentences (at least 250 characters). Try writing another review that explains your thoughts in more detail — the author will appreciate it, and you’ll earn points for it.
Ahoy! I'm sorry that this is so dreadfully late... but better late than never, right? Anyway, onto the review. I don't have many nit-picks, so I have a feeling the ones I do have are going to be really nit-picky (sorry in advance).
You have a great way with words--your writing is very eloquent and poetic. I love it. But this is a bit too much. I would say either have "seeping" or "leaking" but not both, because as it is this sentence drags on a bit.Just a little technical note: "she" shouldn't be capitalized unless you want "she shouts from the back" to read like it's own sentence, but I don't think you do. Dialogue punctuation can be tricky but I think you want to think of this question mark as a comma.
I guess this is sort of a matter of opinion, but whenever I've heard someone say "aw, poor you," it's always been sarcastic. Do you want Sarah to sound sarcastic here? If not, I suggest you change it. Maybe say "aw, I'm sorry," or something like that? I don't usually like to "correct" dialogue, but this one sort of bothered me. >.<
------------------------
Basically, I agree with Skins that there's a lot of clarification that needs to happen here. But I think you agree too. And I think you know how to fix it, too, so I'm not going to dwell on that. I don't know how much you've edited since Skins's review, but in the version I'm seeing I don't find the switch of POV confusing at all! I actually was really impressed by how well you pulled it off. I wasn't confused about who was attacking Sarah, either. I was just confused about why he was attacking her. And, of course, I was confused about the butcher part too. I think what made it so confusing was that I didn't know there was a change of setting. I assumed (as I think Skins did too) that the scene at the butcher's was taking place at the cafe. So a little more clarity there might go a long way.
My biggest issue with this piece, though, is a rather tricky one: it feels like it could/should be a novel. Trident's contest is (as TheWalkinDude suggested) for short pieces. Trident said: "I’m looking for outstanding pieces of flash fiction 1000 words or less." Now, your piece is only 2 words over the limit, and I'm sure you could get rid of two words fairly easily, so that's not the problem. It's just that (especially after reading your explanation) I see a lot of backstory in this piece. First, there's the character. Ed is great! He has so much potential to be such a complex character, because in the beginning we see that he's poor and cold and tired and we feel bad for him, which almost makes it hard to blame him for killing Sarah. But I do rather hate him for not being disgusted by the idea of eating the "bologna." Anyway, I love his complexity. Then, there's the world. The whole idea of human meat being in "high demand" is disgusting, and disturbing... but very intriguing. I want to know more about it. Then, of course, there's the plot, which brings up questions about how legal the human meat industry is, and whether Sarah's death is ever tracked down to Ed, and so on.
Now all this complexity (besides, of course, your wonderful way with words!) is what I love so much about this piece. But I think it's also what makes it so confusing. There's just so much information, and potential information, trying to fit into a "flash fiction" piece! It makes it not feel like flash-fiction, but rather a prologue, or a synopsis, or a shortened novel or something like that. Because it's specifically for flash-fiction, I think Trident's probably looking for something that takes advantage of that particular medium, so even though this is technically short enough, I don't think it's what he's looking for. Maybe after the contest is done, you can come back and expand this piece, but for now, if your main goal is to win the contest, I have a rather painful suggestion to make. I hate to say so, but I think you may want to simplify this a little. Don't necessarily dumb anything down, or take anything out of the big scheme of things, but just make the scheme a little less big. Home in on a certain aspect that you want to be the main focus of the piece and of everything else include just what you think is necessary for your readers to get a complete understanding of what you're saying.
For example, if you want the piece to be mainly about Ed's character, then make it more focused on him. Show his thoughts, dwell on his predicament. How does he feel about capturing people and butchering them? Does he regret it, but do it just for money? Does he enjoy it? Does he just force himself to be numb to the horror of it? Then, while you are developing his character, you don't have to hint at the other aspects of the story (like the setting/world, for example) because you will have to talk to them in order to talk about his character. You will have to explain, say, his butchery connection in order to develop his character. But all that was just an example. You could, for example, decide to make developing the idea of the human meat industry your goal, and make all the other elements of the story necessary components to reaching that goal. I hope that makes sense. Basically I mean that right now you're vague about everything, so you have equal emphasis on each element of the story, and I can't really tell what the point of the piece is, you know? Especially because it's so short, I suggest you focus on your reason for writing this (other than the contest, of course! ^.^) and make the piece about that.
Overall, I liked this. Your writing is very captivating and thought-provoking, and I loved what I was reading even if I didn't know exactly what was going on the whole time. I am really intrigued by all the mysteries you've set up and I could really visualize this as a novel(la), or at least a short story. You've done marvelously at combining three random things and not making them feel out of place (except maybe the wrench... I still don't understand really where Sarah got it from, and it doesn't feel like it's a very important part of the story on a whole). I just think that for the sake of the contest you may want to take a step or two backwards. Also, about the ending line: I think you could just get rid of it. The line before it is much more punchy, in my humble opinion.
Well, I'm sorry this was so late, but I hope it helps some! Let me know if you have questions/comments or want me to look at a revised version.
Good luck!
a
Ok, thanks for the advice! I'll keep at it
Ah! That makes sense now you've explained it. I love the idea, by the way.
I know what you mean. A lot of writers struggle to make sure that the readers understand what they're saying. In your head, you know exactly what's going on, but when it comes to writing it down, it becomes harder to explain. Don't get downhearted about it though; I'm sure you can make this clearer.
One thing though! If the butcher thing is how things happen, you may have to explain what happened to Sarah. Obviously, she gets chopped up and made into meat... but what I mean is that people would have noticed that she's missing, right? Make sure that you explain what the case is when it comes to the law, and the consequences of her murder. Even if it's just a sentence of her being reported as a "missing person".
~ Skins
Hi, you've confirmed my suspicions that it is definitely too vague. I can see how it's confusing now that you've pointed it out. I tend to assume everyone reading anything i write automically know everything i do about the plot. I think the reviewer before you thought pretty much the same thing but just wouldn't say it.

The plot is supposed to be like this: Ed is a carpet salesman but this is just a cover to allow him into people's homes. When he gets the chance he drugs them, takes them home and chops them up for meat to sell to the butcher because human meat is in high demand. Mike is the butcher he sells it to. Because nobody wants any carpet he hasn't been able to sell anything, and takes the opportunity in the cafe to drug the woman. The last location is the butcher's. It is supposed to all become clear at the end haha, but i need to work on it obviously. I'm still learning anyway, it's all practice.
So you've been very helpful, thank you. Oh and don't feel bad about reviewing late, it's cool
Hey there, Lee!
I'm so, so, so, so, so, so sorry I haven't reviewed this until now. I've been bogged down with a lot of reviews lately, and I will be honest with you when I say that I forgot about this. I never normally do that, so I feel terrible. Thank God for the reading list! Hopefully though, I'll be able to make it up to you with a half decent review. So yeah, here we go!
The first thing I noticed about this was when it got to the point of the attack. I wanted it to be more dramatic and a little clearer. I was like, what? Wait... He's attacking her? at the beginning. I was a bit unsure if it was Ed who was even attacking her at first because of the POV swap. It is almost twelve o' clock in the morning, so maybe I'm just half asleep, but I do think you could make some details a little clearer. You asked if we thought this ending was a bit too vague, and I kind of think it was. I also think the story overall was a bit vague... This is just my opinion though, remember. It was Ed who killed her though... right?
I think that you could have made the attack more dramatic too overall. You had some good line sin there, but I think that you could have done with spacing out some of the paragraphs and made them a little shorter. As well as short sentences, short paragraphs can sometimes cause suspense and tension. I think you mainly need to make what is happening exactly clearer, to be more vivid about it. I think that with a bit of editing, you'll easily be able to achieve this.
My main critique is one I'm a little unsure about, I have to be honest. Now, I'm not too sure what this story's actually about exactly. I can't quite tell you what the plot is. Whether it's just me being slow, I don't know, but I will bring it up because it's something I noticed. Basically, I'm a bit confused. Here's what I think at the moment. Ed is hired by Mike - I assumed he's Sarah's wife, but that I'm not sure about - to kill Sarah. He does so and Mike then redecorates the cafe. I don't know though... I could be entirely wrong.
This is what makes me think otherwise. I mean, if Ed killed his wife, he wouldn't really be asking Mike how is wife was, right? Then you go on to describe Mike acting all shifty as though Ed has no idea that his wife is dead... If she is dead, that is, because I don't even know if Sarah was his wife. Do you see how I'm confused?
I feel kind of silly here though because I really think I'm missing out on something. I'm worried that I'm simply being very slow to catch on. If there is something crucial that I'm missing, please tell me!
The only other negative that I have for you concerns Ed's actions as a whole. I mean, him killing the woman seemed so... random? He didn't come across as especially mental or murderous at the beginning, and he behaved kindly enough to the woman, so I found him violently killing her rather unrealistic. I think you need to show us more signs of him being murderous, to be honest. Make the fact that he's a person who would murder someone else more believable. I'm still not 100% sure if he's even the one who kills her though... I'm pretty sure, but hey, you never know.
Negatives aside, I did enjoy reading this. I think that you have a really nice writing style and your grammar overall was good. It's hard to write in the present tense, and you seem to have done so well. You have some really nice descriptions in this, so make sure that you keep them. What I like best about this though is actually the plot, even if I'm not too sure of what it is exactly! If it is what I think it is, it's a wonderful one. It's original and exciting.
Keep writing,
xoxo Skins
[Corrections and thoughts marked in red.]
Altogether, a very good story compromising of three off the wall, rack-your-brains things. I'm sure if you reread over it and fix some of the things I pointed out and maybe lengthen it a little more, it'll be great!
Also, isn't the Three-Pronged Contest entry supposed to have a thousand words? I may be wrong, but I thought it said that somewhere in it.