Published February 25, 2009
I'm waiting...
I'm waiting...
I'm...
Waiting for you
to tell me something-
anything.
Anything to dispel this,
malaise.
I'm a stranger,
even to myself.
A shadow of a ghost...
I don't like this...
Interloper -
this stalker,
that's squatting my mirror.
I'm waiting...
I'm...
Waiting for you
to chase me away,
to snuff out my emotions.
Say something -
anything.
Points:
Time spent:
IP address:
Canary word: Present
Possible AI signals:
Original Text:
Are you sure you want to delete this comment? This cannot be undone.
Mark this comment as a review? Points will be awarded to the poster.
Your comment was posted, but it wasn’t long enough to count as a review. Reviews need about four complete sentences (at least 250 characters). Try writing another review that explains your thoughts in more detail — the author will appreciate it, and you’ll earn points for it.
I only saw half an idea in the entire stanza. There's a certain level, even when given poetic license, that you shouldn't stretch out your meanings and themes so thin that when the reader finally pieces together everything, he feels cheapened by the experience. That's happening here. The pauses, the breaks, the repetitions, all feel like you've overloaded this stanza with meaningless filler. Take out the second "anything", because it sounds cheesy - I've seen "Anything, anything, please!" or the idea of it used too much in poetry and prose for it to have any value anymore. "Malaise" isn't the right word, especially when the rest of the stanza's word choice is so simplistic. It appears pretentious, so replace it with a lighter word that sounds like it's been written by the same voice that spoke the previous lines.
Why? You seem to be conflicted on whether you're talking to another person, talking to yourself, or if they're all the same person. It's foggy and I hope you explain it later on. If not, then re-work the first line of this stanza so that it relates to the person you're talking about.
"Stalker" has become such a teenage term, if you will, that it's comedic when not used absolutely perfectly in conversation and literature. It didn't ring with me on a subjective level, so if you find the same reaction among several readers, take it out and replace it with something else - preferably, a word that actually connects to "interloper", because "stalker" certainly doesn't have anything to do with it. A stalker hardly interlopes with the person he's stalking or with anyone else connected to that person. That's why he's called a stalker - he hides, waits.
Again, this stanza was a disappointment like was the first; it dragged out the idea or theme through multiple lines and ended it with a whimper. I want a bang, especially if you're going to repeat the first stanza almost entirely (a cheap trick, but some have managed to do it right by introducing another idea and making it "the same, but different" kind of feel). Right now, this entire poem is mediocre because of the poor way you started the first and last stanzas, so I suggest focusing on them much more than the middle ones.
Hope that helped.
this is good... but of course, it could be better.
Some parts are a little confusing to me.
haha. maybe it's my brain that's not functioning.
-threm.
Thank you very much Claeren
This is very good. Just a few corrections in bold:
The rhythm is kinda tricky, but it's a great poem. And better yet, only one corection! Yay!! Great Job!
- Claeren
Come on guys, any help?