Margaret Thatcher, the former prime minister of Great Britain, delivered an eulogy aimed to
honor the former president Ronald Reagan. Using a respectful yet direct tone, Thatcher seeks to
not only illustrate to the American people Reagan's superb character, but to also explain why he
was not only an amazing president, but also an amazing person. By using diction to emphasize
Reagan's cheerful and optimistic demeanor, highlighting his achievements and their effects, and
explaining how his actions and character connected to American Ideals, Thatcher shows the
American people how and why Ronald Reagan was a president and person to be remembered.
In the opening of her eulogy, Thatcher emphasizes Ronald Reagan's character and why it
makes him a great president. She uses diction to explain how always had an optimistic spirit.
For example, refers to his presence as "cheerful and invigorating"
. A short time later, she highlights how he was always humorous and even referred to him as "the great cause of cheering us up. " However, she not only explains his uplifting demeanor, but she connects it to how he handles the daunting responsibilities that an American president must take on. She highlights that Reagan's duty was heavy with risk, and that even in dark hours he still pursued his tasks with a "lightness of spirit. " By explaining how Reagan was always calm and even "jocular" in times of terror and darkness, Thatcher is able to humanize Reagan as not only a president that
can handle the huge duty of being a president, but as a president that can handle it with grace
and peace. This illustrates Reagan as someone of exemplary character that the American people
can look up and remember as a role model.
Thatcher then transitions to highlight Reagan's achievements and accomplishments during
his time in office. She utilizes repetition, continuously using the same sentence structure of what
people thought Reagan could accomplish to what he actually accomplished. For example she
states, "Others prophesied the decline of the West" the transitions into how Reagan "inspired
America and" and renewed their faith. She then continues with this structure to highlight how
he improved the country economically and won the Cold War and turning enemies into allies.
She then utilizes cause and effect after. By stating that the world the American people live in
today is more hopeful and prosperous than "the world he inherited on becoming president", she
claims that the freedom and opportunity we have now is an effect of Reagan's hard work and
accomplishments. This shows the American people that he was a president who wanted what
was best for them and worked hard to make it happen. Through highlighting his achievements
and its effect on America today, Thatcher paints Reagan as a president who accomplished alot in
office and improved the country, convincing her audeience that Reagan was a great person.
Finally, Thatcher aimed to highlight how Reagan's character and achievements were
connected to American culture and ideals. She first highlights how his actions were "firm and
deliberate," especially in the context in the cold war. She uses diction and creates juxtaposition,
by painting the Soviet Union as evil she paints Reagan as almost a "hero" who saved the
American people. She highlights the "insatiable drive" of the Soviet Union, she even calls them
an "evil empire." Through doing this, she is able to show how Reagan is the good guy, who
defended America from the evil communist Soviet Union. By using definition, defining
America's stance as "freedom and opportunity for ordinary people" she explains what makes
America what it is and the connects it to how Reagan was someone who was truly American, and
therefore a person to be remembered.In conclusion, by using diction to emphasize Reagan's cheerful and optimistic demeanor, highlighting his achievements and their effects, and explaining how his actions and character connected to American Ideals, Thatcher shows the American people how and why Ronald Reagan was a president and person to be remembered.
Points:
Time spent:
Canary word: Present
Possible AI signals:
Original Text:
Are you sure you want to delete this comment? This cannot be undone.
Mark this comment as a review? Points will be awarded to the poster.
Your comment was posted, but it wasn’t long enough to count as a review. Reviews need about four complete sentences (at least 250 characters). Try writing another review that explains your thoughts in more detail — the author will appreciate it, and you’ll earn points for it.
125,020 Literary Works • 672,734 Reviews
Well, the intent is clear: to convince me that Margaret Thatcher, in her eulogy for Ronald Reagan, constructs a portrait of a man worthy of American reverence. Like so many dutiful homework assignments before it, the transitions, though abrupt, exist; you clearly know how to frame a paragraph.
Conversely, the essay is a familiar arrangement of rhetorical devices lined up in neat rows, waving their little flags to say, “Look! I’m being used!” But something vital is missing... The opening paragraph declares that Thatcher used tone and diction to paint Reagan as a great man. A safe claim. A very safe claim. So safe, in fact, that the essay spends the rest of its time proving what no reader was likely to contest in the first place. Instead of interrogating how these rhetorical moves function within the political and historical context of the speech, it is announced like a museum docent pointing out that a painting "uses color."
The dichotomy between Reagan, who is "good" and the Soviet Union, which is "bad," is accepted without question, as though the essay fears that looking too closely at Thatcher’s framing might cause the entire structure to wobble. Therefore, Reagan is "truly American." Besides this being a byproduct of cultural mythmaking at the time, why is he "truly" American? What differentiated him from other presidents, men in power, people in general? What ideological work does that framing do?
The essay has some identified strategies, a general purpose, a respectful academic tone, and it has structure. The issue is not one of grammar or surface-level competence, though. It is that the essay does not go beyond describing what Thatcher does; it does not interrogate her choices, complicate them, contextualize them, or demonstrate their necessity.
In short... it does not analyze.
Okay, I wish you would have given us any clue on what exactly you want us to do with this essay. Was this for school?
The paragraphing is all over the place, you have one block with unruly punctuation in the middle of it and then just large spaces in between the other lines.
I don’t mean to sound off but this kinda feels copied from an AI site.
And well, I never liked Margaret Thatcher and it’s been pretty obvious now that Reagan was pretty horrible for the US economy and in general @.@ I mean you are just going over the eulogy but for an essay, I would have liked you to state the point of the essay clearly in the beginning.