Points:
Time spent:
Canary word: Present
Possible AI signals:
Original Text:
Are you sure you want to delete this comment? This cannot be undone.
Mark this comment as a review? Points will be awarded to the poster.
Your comment was posted, but it wasn’t long enough to count as a review. Reviews need about four complete sentences (at least 250 characters). Try writing another review that explains your thoughts in more detail — the author will appreciate it, and you’ll earn points for it.
Uh. This is amazing. I am not religious and I don't want to be, but I can understand so clearly the idea behind this because of the image and narrative you chose. I have never read a religious poem that has been this accessible and yet this clearly religious.
I am also impressed because the rhyming in this poem does not seem obviously forced at any moment, and that rhyming gives it a second of being pieces in a puzzle, fitting in exactly, which only serves to heighten how successful your poem is otherwise.
Can I say, too, I love the reference in "the beautiful design" and how exactly it fits the concrete image of the poem and the philosophy you're exploring.
So now, all the praise out of the way, let's take a look at some of the weak spots. For one, here:
I love the phrasing of the stars becoming relevant, but the idea of "I mentally took the idea with resent" has no clear meaning, which is extra detrimental to your piece because you've been so clear up until this point, you know? In fact, this lack of clarity bleeds through to the end of this stanza, when I don't understand why, if the narrator has taken the idea of science and stars, they'd still be looking for the lie. In what way? To see if they could prove it? To see if they could find it at all from the brightness of the place where they were? Just a little more clarity would bring the philosophy out, and would really strengthen us through that section to bring us to your strong, strong, ending.
The other thing I'd say to have a look at would be your meter. Here's a clear example:
First of all, barefeet should be two words. Barefoot is an adjective and a single word.
Secondly, you can see that the first line has seven syllables, while the second line has only five and fits exactly with the last line, but that then alienates it from the rest of the stanza. I'd try to fix it up. Give it some thought!
PM me if you have any questions, okay?
Good luck and keep writing!
Hi there.
This is pretty good. I like that you keep focused on the idea of stepping stones and likened it to something else. Nice job.
Omit "had." It's already in the past tense without it, and it only makes it longer.
add "the" before. It'll help improve clarity.
The wording feels a little off to me here. It's a little stilted, like you really had to reach for that rhyme. I'm not a big fan of rhyme, anyway. I suggest trying this in a less strict rhyme scheme. Never allow your rhyme scheme to dictate your vocabulary.
I think that you should show us the design instead of saying beautiful. To make a beautiful poem, you usually don't want to see the word "beautiful" in the poem. Show us what you mean. Also, I don't like the word horribly. How about "became impossible to find." It would also improve the rhythm here. It feels a syllable short as it is.
It needs to be "resentment" here. It isn't grammatically correct when it is as it is.
I think these lines need more emotion in them. They're kind of where the speaker has an epiphany. These lines are just kind of like, yeah, the lie is dead. I think your issue is the word "stood." Standing doesn't convey anything about the speaker. You could say "wept" if the epiphany is sad. Or frowned if the speaker isn't comfortable with it yet. See, I don't even know the correct emotion the speaker is feeling here.
I think you mean "disbelieving."
bare feet is two words.
Swore should be "sworn."
I like the ending. Nice job. I hope this review was helpful. Happy writing!