Published February 8, 2020
...
Points:
Time spent:
IP address:
Canary word: Present
Possible AI signals:
Original Text:
Are you sure you want to delete this comment? This cannot be undone.
Mark this comment as a review? Points will be awarded to the poster.
Your comment was posted, but it wasn’t long enough to count as a review. Reviews need about four complete sentences (at least 250 characters). Try writing another review that explains your thoughts in more detail — the author will appreciate it, and you’ll earn points for it.
Hello. This is my review.
In the beginning
What I found most interesting about this was the ending, it didn’t feel like a complete ending, it felt like the end of chapter or perhaps the end of a prologue. I wouldn’t object to a continuation. While I know you said that you probably won’t edit this, but I will still note mistakes and missteps I found and try to tie them into greater suggestions and things to watch out for. Starting, aptly enough, at the beginning I found your comparison between an Airport and a castle to be slightly awkward, It was okay in the beginning, but I felt you stretched it a little when you compared the airplanes to horses, nevertheless I applaud your effort, extended metaphors are things I have a difficult time grasping and rarely do, so good on you for trying (the best way to get worse is always not practicing). On the more boring side of this, you put a semicolon (“so large, like a castle;”), where there should be a colon (“so large, like a castle:”) semicolons connect complete clauses, essentially you’re just welding sentences together because they are closely related, do not fear the semicolon though, they are quite useful when used correctly. Next is the entire second paragraph, your meaning here was scrambled by overlong phrases and strange descriptions (that one involving the Roman army comes to mind), the fourth paragraph also suffers from this problem, with descriptions like “while his paper, takeaway coffee cup...” this passage has an awkward rhythm; I would suggest removing the “paper,” so it reads like “while his takeaway cup...” we don’t really lose much description as most take out cups are either made from cardboard, paper, or styrofoam. Another description like this is “ She looked at him for what felt like the first time she had ever done since that rain-soaked park a lifetime ago.“ this description has a contradiction in it (“she looked at him for what felt like the first time since”) and really should just be rewritten. One final bad line I would like to mention is “fool’s gold pledges” it seems like you were trying to do some wordplay here, put came off as awkward and tonally dissonant.
Not done yet.
Splitting this into to paragraphs so as not to crush you under an avalanche of overblown vocabulary, I will focus briefly and on one of my pet peeves: word choice. You use the word ‘languished’ to describe someone’s hair, languish roughly means ‘to lose energy’, the remedy to this is simple: a dictionary. In this same description I also found a bit of hyperbole I quite liked: “twisting its curls, kissing ever strand”. At risk of sound like an imbecile I will end with a complement on the pacing, it was not not too slow and it was not too fast, so good job on that.
Look forward to seeing more from you!
This was my review. Goodbye.
Hey hey and thanks for the review!
The two main comments I took away from this was far flung metaphors and a wonky rhythm. I agree with this and am now considering rewriting this properly as it is a bit every where.
Thanks for the feedback!
No problem! Something I think I%u2019m going try and find a way to recommend beta readers. I have two (Abigail and Stephanie, three counting my English teacher) and they are extremely helpful. I would only advise giving your works to people you trust
Grammar
1.
I think "callused" is spelled wrong, but that might be just an alternate spelling.
2.
I think it's "takeout", but again, that might be just a regional thing or something.
Word Choice and Flow
1.
the whole segment about what she didn't like about airports, in my opinion, should be better unified. one suggestion I have is adding "I always hated" or something similar as anaphora to create a sense of parallelism.
2.
"caused more by" is a bit of a confusing word choice on first read. maybe tweak it a bit.
3.
this could be reordered for better flow in focus, instead of abruptly switching to Alex, and then back again.
4.
this could be broken up better.
5.
"beamed falsely" is kind of a short-lived description for that kind of detail.
6.
"she watched as" isn't needed.
Other
1. this story doesn't seem to have a definite conclusion. on the other hand part of me supposes maybe it does, in a way, maybe it's more of the next thing:
2. there are some big information gaps, mainly the answers to these two questions:
- where are they flying to?
- why?
as I was reading this I just couldn't help but notice. these are pretty important things to have missing. considering the whole focus of the story is their flight and the airport, it's very jarring not to know why they're even there. I get that the main focus isn't where they're going, but I think it's inclusion not really debatable in this situation. they're literally in the airport, leaving.
anyways, otherwise, I thought this was a good story, even if you haven't written in a while! nice job
Hey hey and thanks for the review,
Normally when I plan my stories a make a few notes on the sequence of events and how it will be structured, but for this I was just kind more determined to get it finished rather than to finish it well.
Thanks for the feedback
no problem!