Published January 27, 2020
...
Points:
Time spent:
IP address:
Canary word: Present
Possible AI signals:
Original Text:
Are you sure you want to delete this comment? This cannot be undone.
Mark this comment as a review? Points will be awarded to the poster.
Your comment was posted, but it wasn’t long enough to count as a review. Reviews need about four complete sentences (at least 250 characters). Try writing another review that explains your thoughts in more detail — the author will appreciate it, and you’ll earn points for it.
Hello. This is my review.
This was good. But telling people what they’re doing right doesn’t usually lead to improvement, so let’s start with the bad.
First of these is a grammar error: ‘“wow, now that this poetic pixa.”’, I’m pretty sure you meant ‘that it is’ or ‘this is’ either of these choices works in context and I’d be splitting hairs if I recommend one over the other. The second of these is a slightly off description: where you described a storm that “painting like a toddler with lightning across the sky”, I would suggest removing “like a toddler” from the description, while it would make it more readable. In the similar vein you described lights with a “placid brightness”, perhaps change “placid” to “pallid”, I guess “placid” works, it isn’t really descriptive.
With that out of the way I can give you some praise:
I think this is one of your best works, I was genuinely inspired by portions, especially by the end. This end is also something I feel you deserve praise for; it encapsulates everything a post-apocalyptic story should: the hopelessness, the terror, the helplessness, I can only imagine what it must be like to be the last of the human race, and to know you would never see another living thing again. This could have been something much worse in less capable hands, but you manage to turn it into something beautiful and sad. I wouldn’t mind a prequel.
I apologize if this is not up to par with my other reviews I am unjustifiably exhausted.
This was my review. Goodbye.
Wow. This is really, really good. It really dug deep. And it made me really sad. Jeff is all alone with only a robot for company. Pixa is really well developed. She/it sure helped make it seem not totally alone for poor Jeff. She is as comforting and as close to an actual human that you can get. Though this was only a short story, you managed to get her personality through immediately. She is nurturing and caring. I got attached to her right away and forgot that she is a robot. Or a computer. Or both.
Jeff is an amazing character as well. So well-developed. I could sense his pain, yet you managed not to make him sound as if he was always complaining or griping. He seems to be a character who is naturally of cheerful disposition, yet is so lonely. His loneliness really hit home. I would die if I had no human contact.
Nice twist at the end. I find it ironic that the only hope Jeff has at human contact is through aliens. I hope he gets to meet them and is no longer lonely.
Keep writing. You are a stupendous writer!
-Shieldmaiden
I really love this story! some things to tweak:
1.
"shy away, bashfully" is redundant, and vague. try giving us something more specific.
Example:
2.
in my opinion, the little quip there is pushing the story-within-a-story thing a bit too much. also "a small paragraph of description" is very wordy, try being more concise.
Example:
3.
your commas need correcting. also I think it saying something like "this many famous authors" instead of just a few named ones would sound more like a real AI if you wanted to do that.
Example:
4.
in context, "spied on" has a more negative connotation than is fitting. this could also be more concise.
Example:
5.
this could use a little breaking up for better coherence.
Example:
6.
needs a comma, grammatically, but it's worth noting you don't really need the name.
Example:
7.
a more specific and visual description would probably be better than generic "death and decay".
Example:
8.
the sentence about "support him with the weight of this new information" weakens the tone a bit with the diction. try rewording for bigger punch.
Example:
9.
the mood of this description seems indecisive. you should either simplify it to the beautiful meaning or the nonsensical qualities, whichever would be more accurate. it would help it be more cohesive.
Example:
10.
"window" would suffice.
Example:
11.
I think elaborating on this scientific aspect would really enrich the story, as the common reader won't fill in the factoid blanks--it's said by scientists that any alien signals we might receive would be more than millions of years old.
12.
this is a little confusing phrasing at first glance, you could try rewording for clearer comprehension.
Example:
really cool story! keep up the good work
Hey, hey and thanks for the review!
All your comments were very helpful and I%u2019m glad you liked the story.
Have a nice day
no problem!