Published January 26, 2011
Once upon a time, there was a fish.
That is the story; the rest is detail.
The details begin – as far as anyone can tell – with the day he was born. For the benefit of the reader, I shall pass over the not-so-euphoric scene of his birth. Rather, we shall begin approximately twelve seconds after the fish was spat out into existence.
Upon opening his beady little eyes and discovering the wonderful and troubling thing that is life, the fish quickly realized two things: one, he really should really learn how to swim, being a fish and all; second, he was, in fact, terrified of water. Upon the realization of the latter, the former immediately took care of itself, and the fish was off like a kite in a hurricane, rocketing out of the ocean and into the dry up-world.
“That's better,” said the fish, glad to be free of the horrific dystopia from which he had emerged. “I shall live here, now, I think.”
It just so happens that a philosopher happened to be sitting on the beach when the fish appeared. Being a monoglot, the philosopher had never spoken to a fish before, philosophized to himself that this would be as good a time as any to give it a try.
“Hullo,” said the philosopher to the fish.
“Hello,” replied the fish.
“Having a nice tanning, are we? I caution you, young fish, that you could develop skin dystrophy.”
“I'm not tanning,” said the fish. “I'm looking for a place to stay. I've left my home, you see.”
The philosopher twirled his long, slender mustache and pondered this scenario. This was certainly strange. After all these years of never once speaking to a fish, he finally finds the courage to engage one in conversation and finds that it wants nothing more than decent lodgings.
“Well,” he said to the fish. “I suppose you could stay at my cottage. At least for a time.”
With that said, the fish and the philosopher became roommates. It was a little jarring at first, as the fish tended to hyperventilate any time a bottle of water was brought into the room. But the two slowly but surely grew on one another. Being something of a misanthropist, the philosopher found that he rather preferred the fish to actual people. And the fish, having never met or talked to anyone before, was more than satisfied with the philosopher's company.
They talked often, and long. One particularly confusing discussion happened to be concerning the importance of shiny things.
“They're valuable, you see,” said the philosopher. “Without shiny things, the world would stop spinning?”
“So value is measured in shiny things?” said the fish. To him, and every other fish, there was no such thing as the concept of value. At least, not yet.
“I suppose so, yes,” said the philosopher, and meant it. It should be noted that he was not a particularly good philosopher, which is why no one knows his name to this day. But the fish believed him, and always remembered their discussion of shiny things.
The two bunked together for the next few years, sharing countless discussions and stories. The fish liked the philosopher, and the philosopher wouldn't mind admitting that he was quite fond of the fish. They were happy together, and shared many laughs and banters and Christmastimes.
Had this been a love story, that last paragraph would have ended with the words “happily ever after.” But this is not a love story; this is a story about life. This story, like every other story about life, ends with death.
Being mortal, and being old, the philosopher soon succumbed to the natural way of things. The fish, who had come to understand the concept of dying long ago, was greatly saddened by the loss of his only friend. Abandoning the cottage by the ocean, the fish finally returned to his home in the deep blue.
When he arrived home, he was asked many questions, most having to do with the biological inaccuracy of how he survived so many years outside the water. The fish told them many things, sharing the words and teachings of the philosopher for all to hear.
But it was in the meaning and worth of shiny things that his listeners loved the most. The word spread of the value of shiny things, and before long they were among the most sought-after treasures in all the ocean. The tales of shiny things passed down from generation to generation, son to son, and the legend only grew as time went on.
This is why, when you throw a hook into the water, the fish bite it. They're not trying to get at the worm or the cricket or the chewing gum you have so barbarically impaled upon it. They simply want the shiny thing because, to fish, shiny things are the greatest treasure of all.
Points:
Time spent:
IP address:
Canary word: Present
Possible AI signals:
Original Text:
Are you sure you want to delete this comment? This cannot be undone.
Mark this comment as a review? Points will be awarded to the poster.
Your comment was posted, but it wasn’t long enough to count as a review. Reviews need about four complete sentences (at least 250 characters). Try writing another review that explains your thoughts in more detail — the author will appreciate it, and you’ll earn points for it.
im not graet with critesim, or spelling for that mater. this a wonderfull story, this is a great bed time story, its funny,i realy like this story, keep writing like this. sorry that i have nothing help full to sat
p.s this is a great story
Spoiler
The spoiler above contains my full text critique. My comments are in [red brackets].
Good job! A very light-hearted story, despite the philosopher's death. A quirky little fable, its strengths lie mostly in the slightly odd humour, intricacy of sentences, and a degree of word-play. There was a definite ending, which is a big plus for you, and an amusing little lesson at the end. Overall, well done.
There are, however, a few details where you could have polished your piece a little bit more. For one, you enjoy using unusual words, which sometimes don't fit the context and the meaning of the sentence. The thesaurus is a tool, not a guidebook.
Plot-wise, I only have one question: how did the fish overcome his fear of water? That's not explored at all, which is unusual for this piece. I understand hand-waving the impossibility of the fish living on dry land, but the fact that he's afraid of water is kind of a big deal, and it's what started the whole story. To see him just suddenly overcome his hydrophobia is very jarring.
But, once again, very well done. I enjoyed this story both on its technical merits and its cute plot. I look forward to your next piece.
Your servant,
cC
I just wanted to say that you used this writing style very well! The plot was very interesting and I had a very enjoyable read. You did good! I can't actually find something wrong with it, so I can't elaborate much.
Keep writing!
Ofir
Hey there.
This is really wacky. (But in a good way!)
I love the original plot. Fantastic.
But why does the fish not like the, "Horrible dystopia." I think you should elaborate on this a bit.
Also, it's sad about what happens to the man in the end. In my opinion, I would've had the old man eat the fish, because food was starting to become scare maybe? That would have been awesome.
But, I feel the ending is a tad rushed. Maybe elaborate on that too.
This is quite good otherwise.
~ T.K
Wow, this was awesome! Really original and creative. There was one thing I didn't like, however:
Just those few nitpicks.
With that said, the fish and the philosopher became roommates. It was a little jarring at first, as the fish tended to hyperventilate any time a bottle of water was brought into the room. But the two slowly but surely grew on one another. Being something of a misanthropist, the philosopher found that he rather preferred the fish to actual people. And the fish, having never met or talked to anyone before, was more than satisfied with the philosopher's company.
The two bunked together for the next few years, sharing countless discussions and stories. The fish liked the philosopher, and the philosopher wouldn't mind admitting that he was quite fond of the fish. They were happy together, and shared many laughs and banters and Christmastimes.
These two paragraphs both tell how the fish likes the philosopher and vice versa. Idk why, but that bugged me for some reason. We already got the point I guess.
Also, why did the fish have such a fear and dislike of water? And if it did have a fear and dislike of said water, how did it manage to live in water again at the end?
“Without shiny things, the world would stop spinning?” Should this be a question? It doesn't fit.
But yeah, I love the ending, it was really cool.
I loved the story! It was interesting to read. I liked your use of higher vocabulary words instead of opting for the less-educated approach. It added a flair of wisdom to the work. There were only two things that I would consider changing.
The first:
I would omit the 'out' in that sentence so that it would read 'the fish was spat into existence'. I think it adds to the flow of the piece and the 'out' is a bit awkward and upsets the flow a bit.
The second:
I'm sure that it was a simple mistake, but I would omit one of the really's. It just sounds a bit redundant. Personally I would take out the first really, but it's all up to you.
Other that those couple things, I thought it was an entertaining story. I enjoyed how you offered a reason as to why fish love shiny things. Very well done, sir. Very well done indeed.
oh my such adventure! i love this story.