E - Everyone

Cherchez la femme

PreviousNext

Cherchez la femme

Foreword

Cherchez la femme – ‘Search for a Woman’ – the French say. And they know what it means. Cherchez la femme, when intelligent men become stupid and perform unreasonable and foolish deeds. Cherchez la femme, when sudden wars burst out and long wars cease for no apparent reason. Cherchez la femme, when strong dynasties come to an end and great empires get ruined. Cherchez la femme.

***

Once, in the 11th century, there lived … no, not a princess, just a girl.

She wasn’t a simple girl – her family was noble and the most powerful in the Land. Their ancestors were extraordinary warriors, brave and strong, but not lucky. They came here looking for shelter from heathen Saxon swords and pitiless sea. They had decided not to go back to their rocky and rough Homeland, but to sail south. And they conquered this Land and its people, and became rulers. But not Kings.

The girl was absolutely beautiful. She took her exquisite features, her refined manners and her quick wit after her French grandmothers; her indomitable will, her outstanding courage and her cold mind after her Viking grandfathers. Everyone in the Castle adored her. They called her ‘Your Highness’, but she wasn’t a princess. She had known it since she was old enough to understand that, despite being called ‘Your Majesty’ in their Land, her Father wasn’t real King because in the letters from abroad he was addressed ‘Duke Richard of Normandy’.

Her family had everything possible: fruitful land, expensive horses, shining gold, finest silk and softest velvet; power over the people, love and respect of friends and envy of foes … The only thing they didn’t have – Royal blood. And that was her dearest dream – to become REAL Queen. She was clever enough to understand – her only chance is to marry a king.

The King to the North was too absorbed in wars. The King to the East was too far away. The king to the South was too powerful and arrogant – he wouldn’t want a little unimportant wife. So, she looked to the West. She talked her father into inviting guests from England. She planned and rehearsed everything: every detail of the dress, every smile, every glance, every move, every curl of her hair. And the King, despite being married with children, fell heels over feet in love with her.

Marriage. Only official marriage. At the age of 17 she became Queen of England. Her husband was twice older than she. She wasn’t interested what happened to his first wife and his children. She wasn’t very much touched when the Saxons scornfully nicknamed him the Unready. They said King married her only in order to stop her Father’s men to harass the south-eastern shores of England. It was all only words. She became Queen. Her Land was ten times bigger that her Father’s. Her wish had been fulfilled. Her vanity had been satisfied.

Years passed. She had three children – two beloved sons and a lovely daughter. But once, a disaster came into her Land. The Northern King (he was already King of three Lands – Norway, Denmark and Sweden) wanted to annex her Land. His army landed in the North and marched towards London, killing everyone and burning everything. She knew that the English army was as weak and unready as its King. But she wasn’t. When the Invader came very close, she persuaded her husband to visit him in order to make a deal and save their people.

The History repeated itself. She was still very beautiful. She planned and rehearsed everything: every detail of the dress, every smile, every glance, every move, every curl of her hair. But then she saw that the Invader was young and strong and handsome (married, though). He was looking only at her. But his time she decided to let herself fall in love.

They made a deal: she would marry him if he let her sons leave for Normandy and didn’t let her home to get destroyed.

The Invader’s army suddenly stopped not far from London and set a camp. In a while her husband and his eldest son (from his first marriage) unexpectedly died. Her beloved children set sail, save and sound, to Normandy, to be raised and educated in love and care by their uncle. As real Princes. She was 31 when she got married to be happy and start a new life becoming Queen of England, Denmark and Norway.

***

But in this World everyone must pay for their sins. And their children must pay. And their grandchildren. But in the case of a Royal family, the whole country must pay.

The first to pay was the Invader. He died when he was 40. His son became King, aged 22, and sent his Mother to exile, but died in two years from a stroke, "brought about by an excessive intake of alcohol”, as the doctors said. But people said he was poisoned. And all the other sons (from both wives) and the only daughter died within a decade of the Invader’s death. At the same time the Queen’s middle son (Saxon) was captured during his visit to England, tortured and died from his wounds.

Her eldest son returned from Normandy and became King (the last King of the Wessex dynasty). Being half-Norman and half-Saxon, he was brought up Norman and he didn’t speak English. He married (for the second time) a girl from the most important Saxon family and deprived his Mother of her property. She died soon afterword. It turned out later that his wife was childless and he sent her to a nunnery.

Her son, the King, felt the breath of Destiny. He took his grand-nephew, a little orphan boy of six years old and the only Royal blood male relative left, to the Court to bring him up as a Prince. He prayed, he confessed to the God (he was called the Confessor), but everything was in vain. Pandora Box was opened. The Fox was let into the Hen-House. And one of the Greatest Catastrophes was already to come.

The next to pay was the Country, whose Unready King betrayed his people, forgot his duty, let his emotions rule his mind. His heir, a noble and brave King, was killed by the Conqueror. The only Saxon Royal blood, aged only 15, was made to flee to exile. He took part in several rebellions against the Normans, but no one took him seriously. And no one knows when and where he died. He didn’t have any children and his death cut the male line of the original Royal family of England. For 300 years England became Norman. The Saxon Earls became no ones, the Saxon peasants became surfs, the Saxon language - forbidden, the Saxon traditions – extinct.

***

The girl is kept in History as the “first of the early medieval queens”, the central figure within the Encomium Emmae Reginae, the richest and the most important woman in England of that time.

Comments & reviews · 2
Note: You are not logged in, but you can still leave a comment or review. Before it shows up, a moderator will need to approve your comment (this is only a safeguard against spambots). Leave your email if you would like to be notified when your message is approved.

User avatar
Sujana
Review
Sujana wrote a review · Thu Mar 17, 2016 5:03 pm

Innocuous Fixes:

-"But his time she decided to let herself fall in love." This.

-"Pandora Box was opened." The Pandora Box was opened.

Actual Review:

I was debating with myself whether I should read this as a narrative short story based off of historical events or an article that just so happened to be a little more emotional than what's conventional. But by a little more, it's only barely so--from what I've read, everything seems incredibly flat, stating facts and the occasional hint of humanity behind all these main players in the political scheme of things at the time. If you truly are looking to make a short story, I suggest making the characters pop out a little more, as now they just seem like people from history books that we can't fully identify with. For example, you've made a good motivation for the Queen, which is basically to find power. You've also made a good conflict when she fell in love. That in and of itself would make a wonderful short story about emotions and ambitions and which of those two might seem more important, but instead you went for the flatline, monotonous article approach. Again, I don't know what you intended, but it looked like you missed a fantastic opportunity.

And let's talk about the names here for a second. I think, from how you describe the situations, that these people are all real, and that they should have names. They don't have to, of course, but by giving characters names they make them a little bit more human and easier to identify with--which is why characters that are referred to only by titles and rarely by names, such as King or Mr. President or even God to some extent, have a very otherworldly feel to them, as if they're more powerful or simply different even though they're still human. The power of a name is an exceptional one indeed, and I think it's worth using. If you're not going to use names, however, I suggest at least taking dominant character traits among your many real characters, interpret them into memorable characters.

Though I like the part in the beginning. It set the scene to some extent, highlighting womanly wiles and the special brand of irrationality that almost define human beings as a whole. I think you could use it better, though, as it doesn't really fit with the rest of the story. It's a crown on a peasant's head, and I think it would be nice to train the peasant into a king.

Good luck with the writing process,

--EM.

User avatar
Lavvie
Review
Lavvie wrote a review · Sun Feb 14, 2016 5:35 pm

Hi there InnaKoba!

First of all, welcome to YWS! You'll find that this is a great website with lots of support and resources for developing your passion for writing. The people are very friendly and always willing to lend a hand... and review, of course!

I think that this is a good start for outlining the story that you have in mind. You really seem to have a good grasp of the plot and what direction you want this to go down. However, there is always room for improvement and I would like to touch on a few things that might help your story out a little bit.

First of all, this doesn't really feel like a short story but more of an expository piece – like the summary you might find on the back of a book. You're explaining to the reader everything that seems to happen over the course of thirty to forty years, but creative writing shouldn't necessarily be about explaining. I know that it is easy to get caught up in a summary of the events, but I feel like you could really use this idea and plot it out over at least a few chapters in a novella. It's a great idea with great potential, but I feel like you're rushing, thus losing any further creative opportunity to be made from it. This is where the stereotypical writerly mantra of "Show, Don't Tell" comes into play. Don't be afraid to express the feelings of the characters, to flesh them out a bit more, and allow for personal interactions to take place so as to develop some sort of action. Otherwise, this feels like little more than an excerpt from a history textbook, which is such a shame because I'm interested to actually read about this story and your characters.

Also, in fantasy – which this definitely is, in combination with some historical facts –, I know that it can be tempting to capitalize words to give them more meaning. For example, I see you giving more strength to words like "land", "homeland", "country", etc. In fact, there is one sentence where you capitalize a lot of usually unimportant words:

Pandora Box was opened. The Fox was let into the Hen-House. And one of the Greatest Catastrophes was already to come.


I don't understand this part at all and therefore the capitalization of words seems a bit silly. If you fleshed out your story a bit more, you might have more time and more of an inclination to elaborate on the meaning of these words. Remember to not give strength to many little words because in the end, words come out having seemingly less meaning than even in their original state. It is important not to go overkill on these so-called Important Words. In fact, I don't even think you need to have special words in your story; it mostly just draws away from the story at hand, anyway.

In terms of grammar, some things were missing. Sometimes you forgot crucial articles or there were awkward tense changes.

real King


This happens throughout your piece. There should an article like "a" or "the" in front of "real".

Her only chance is to marry a king


Should be "was" since you are working with the past tense. :)

Other nitpicks in the spoiler below:

Spoiler
They came here


I suggest removing "here" because you haven't yet established where "here" is.

and pitiless sea


I think it would be better to make "sea" plural.

Duke Richard of Normandy


The official way of phrasing such a noble title is: Richard, Duke of Normandy.

fell heels over feet in love with her.


The expression is actually, "Head over heels in love".

Her husband was twice older than she


Would be better to write, "Her husband was twice her age."

They said King married her only in order to stop her Father’s men to harass


Should be: "...to shop her father's men from harassing"

save and sound


safe and sound

She was 31


In writing, it's best to spell out the number than write it in numerals. Much more literary that way. For example: thirty-one instead of 31.

the Saxon peasants became surfs


serfs, not surfs

the Saxon language - forbidden, the Saxon traditions – extinct.


A little bit of funky grammar going on here, and I don't blame you! The correct way of expressing this is: "...the Saxon language forbidden, the traditions extinct."


I was a little confused when you were describing the King of the West marrying the girl. You mentioned that he already had a wife and children, but the girl persisted anyway. Later, you say that the girl did not care what happened to his previous wife and children. Here, I found myself a little confused because, first, what on earth convinced the King to abandon his happily married life for a non-royal? Second, when you write that the girl did not care what happened to his past life, do you mean that they perished somehow or that she did not care how her actions affected the King's old life, that she couldn't care less about the consequences his marriage to her would have on his ex-wife and children? This part was definitely a little unclear and some clarification would be nice :)

In terms of the title, I'm not sure how terribly relevant it is to the content of your story – but then, you probably know better than I in this situation. I do see how you're saying the girl who married the West King for vanity probably instigated a lot of the horrible events that ensued, but it would be nice if you carried that theme more strongly throughout. Of course, it would also help to flesh everything out so that it is a little less expository. I think then your title might carry more relevancy with it. Regarding the wording and Frenchness of it, "cherchez la femme" is actually what you might say as an order. It literally means, "Go look for the woman." The title might be more successful if you considered more grammatical and lexically correct versions, like L'enquête pour la femme (The Quest for the Woman) or À la recherche d'une femme (Searching for a woman). Of course, it's up to you but those options might be better for what you're trying to convey.

Overall, I think the idea is really unique and definitely makes sense historically. Your message is a good one – the execution of it just needs a little boost. I enjoyed reading this, although I don't think the entire thing needs to be in italics. Nevertheless, good job! :D

Don't hesitate to drop me a line if you have any questions!

Best,
Lav



One who sits between two chairs may easily fall down.
— Proverb from Romania and Russia