Published November 12, 2011
I`ve removed this topic, as I realize this is not the correct category for this poem.
Points:
Time spent:
IP address:
Canary word: Present
Possible AI signals:
Original Text:
Are you sure you want to delete this comment? This cannot be undone.
Mark this comment as a review? Points will be awarded to the poster.
Your comment was posted, but it wasn’t long enough to count as a review. Reviews need about four complete sentences (at least 250 characters). Try writing another review that explains your thoughts in more detail — the author will appreciate it, and you’ll earn points for it.
Not the Christian God.
Not by any means.
This poem was about life and death. The tie between the two and the 'god' who must set each in motion.
I realize, though this was probably not the best site for reviews on this poem, it's a little... strange.
I read it. Here lies a spontaneous criticism of your "dramatic poem":
Obviously, I made the assumption quite early that the teller was God. If I'm wrong, then- well, eyes of the beholder, you know?
Overall, it's pretty good! I liked the way you stuck to your flow. It's something I'd love to do but often lose in the moment. This poem is the ultimate antithesis of itself: organized and refreshing; straightforward and artistic.
Keep Writing!
Hi GoaGreena,
I liked this. In poetry there is the concept and the delivery. The best poets combine both to create something deeply effective for the reader, but for most growing poets there is a lag in development in one or the other (or both) that holds them back. I am strongly inclined toward strong concepts, so I will take a poorly executed poem with a great idea over a well executed one with a bland idea any day. Your execution is by no means poor, but it doesn't quite live up to the fantastic concept you have here, so that will be the focus of my points.
You start with the image of sand slipping through fingers, which is the basis for the metaphor this poem is built upon. However, that image is incredibly common, which dulls the impact. This leaves you two choices:
1. Present the sand slipping through fingers in a way that is so unique and fresh that no one will care that it's an overused image.
Or
2. Alter the image to be unique. Right now it's not bad, it's just kind of bland, because I've seen the kid pouring sand through his hands and reflecting on life many times before.
Your second stanza is a pretty big jump in imagery from the other sections. It's ok to have wide-ranging imagery, but it will be more effective if you transition it in more smoothly and make it connect to everything else that is going on.
My other big comment is to keep your ideas rooted. Example:
I can tell that you have something in your head, and you're making an attempt at communicating it to me, but there isn't quite enough to work with. Don't be afraid to offer your reader some more explanation of what is going on so that they can appreciate the full depth of what you're trying to communicate. What is the abyss? How did you create it? Why do you have to destroy it? You don't have to be blunt and state your intentions outright, but give the reader something concrete that they can work off of.
Overall, this was an intriguing poem, and I'm looking forward to seeing what you do as you continue to refine your skills. Good work.
Cheers,
Shade
I loved it! One of my favourite poems! It was easy to keep hooked on, well wriiten and had good describing words. The only thing was that it didn't rhyme but not all poems have to I just find it more interesting if they do! 9.8/10
I loved it! One of my favourite poems! It was easy to keep hooked on, well wriiten and had good describing words. The only thing was that it didn't rhyme but not all poems have to I just find it more interesting if they do! 9.8/10