steps of the temple
Points:
Time spent:
Canary word: Present
Possible AI signals:
Original Text:
Are you sure you want to delete this comment? This cannot be undone.
Mark this comment as a review? Points will be awarded to the poster.
Your comment was posted, but it wasn’t long enough to count as a review. Reviews need about four complete sentences (at least 250 characters). Try writing another review that explains your thoughts in more detail — the author will appreciate it, and you’ll earn points for it.
Wow Eli, this is powerful! It makes you think about those stories in a different way, more in depth. I have to disagree with Kamas, though; I like how you add things to the picture. Although I do agree that you could include a little more substance. I love your idea! My favorite is "Gardening".
Keep writing!
Sage
Hi Eli, nice to see a new face.
I'm sorry I didn't get to this last night.
I'm not going to look at each individual poem and going to keep it short, because to be honest, I
a. am lazy
b. like to look at the big picture.
c. only see this having one big issue that's far more important then the nitpicky stuff.
I'm unfamiliar with your work, because I tend to stalk around before pouncing. But here we go.
What I see here is a sturdy piece of work that's being drowned by an overdependance on relative imagery
that by the end of the poem, is completely meaningless. It's like making everything complex, but not needing too because all it does it weighs down your poem.
For example
It's a really good piece of imagery, but by the end stand meaningless in the poem.
You english majors are pleasant to read, but at the end, I stand beaten down by imagery and concepts and loose strings and don't have much emotion to account for.
You want to communicate your story, which you do, with a lot of excess fluff, that the read tends to spit out in the process as you feed the poem to them, but at the end, I've just been told a story, absolutely no emotional investment in it though.
The fluff has to do with it, through stretching out and layering the concept your poem emcompasses, you lose the essence of the story.
There's a line, it's not fine, because you can play with it, it is flexible. But once you've tipped over the line, on the side of overdependance on description and literary devices (or equally on the side of barren and blunt poetry) It's rather difficult to find that balance so that your poetry becomes a vessel for the story, containing something of value your reader can absorb to actually feel something for it.
All in all your technical is down pat. And we can see it. But don't feed me a load feathers for the sake of feeding me a load of feathers.
Make it a little more delicate. We'll chat about this.
Kamas