Hey Charizard,
Nice to see you again.
So basically I think what's going on in this is that you're a bit too out of syncopation with reality. In my experience with songs they usually work because we have some sort of action that will draw us through the hook and keep us coming back. If we look at popular songs right now like "Cheerleader" then it's the guy telling the girls that they aren't good enough to make him cheat on his girlfriend. If we go back a ways to Queen, "We Will Rock You" is titled what they will do. They have that in common. Even in folk music it's drawing us back in with some sort of action hook.
I think why that is, is because an action, something that you're doing is going to be more memorable than something you say. It's sort of like the difference between Aesop's fable about the scorpion and the fox, and telling someone "People don't change" You're going to remember a story about a scorpion killing a fox who was helping him across a lake [thus killing himself] because he doesn't change over someone telling you "people don't change." Same thing here. If you give us a song that has an action, it's going to be more memorable than a poem that does not.
In brief, actions speak louder than words, show don't tell, create exact details about a situation that you're showing to us and we'll be better equipped to empathise with the situation as well as understand it, see it, remember it and believe it.
In this one you could improve it without rewriting it by taking away all of the conjunctions like "and" because they're sort of getting in the way. The singer can cover that up just because it's a melody. No need to keep it and weaken your points.
I hope this helps. It might be old hat to you by now since this was back in January, but I appreciate having something to review <3
Aley
Points: 1883
Reviews: 806
Donate