Published August 31, 2007
*temporarily removed*
Points:
Time spent:
IP address:
Canary word: Present
Possible AI signals:
Original Text:
Are you sure you want to delete this comment? This cannot be undone.
Mark this comment as a review? Points will be awarded to the poster.
Your comment was posted, but it wasn’t long enough to count as a review. Reviews need about four complete sentences (at least 250 characters). Try writing another review that explains your thoughts in more detail — the author will appreciate it, and you’ll earn points for it.
Cameron:
Dropping the first two lines is not detrimental--do it.
"Man's own attempted chronicling" is too boring for a poem so light. "own" is needlessly repetitive anyway.
A fine piece you have here. Good to see you're improving.
Best,
Brad
Oh, I like it!
My opinion is that "eternity" should rarely be made plural. I think you would be better off saying, "...or an eternity ago..."Grammar and sentence structure.
Is the word not "likeness"? Also, you switch from third person to first person here. It is "their cave drawings"...should it not also be "their own likeness"? I realize that you're trying to make a connection between the old "them" and the modern "us" but it just doesn't flow here.
This certainly isn't proper. It ought to be "It is" or "It was" man's own attempted chronicle. Of course, that doesn't sound as good, yet this sounds wrong, so maybe you ought to rephrase?
Now, we have fourteen lines divided into only two sentences. Mix it up a little.
Description. I find it unnecessary to describe the drawings as "cave drawings" and their minds as "primal".
"Cave drawings" is unnecessary because cave paintings naturally come to mind when you're describing ancient man; there's no need to blurt it out. You might put the drawings on "stone" or find another way to show that they were the work of the first humans.
Again, we know we're talking about ancient humans, so primal seems unnecessary. You could describe the minds as "early" or "growing" or "archaic" but "primal" just seems out-of-place.
Also:
I actually think this could just be shortened to:
Man's own attempted chronicle
as in something
in them rebelled against
the world's forgetfulness.
I really like the part about "the world's forgetfulness." It speaks volumes.
This seems like such a weak, vague ending to me, almost like you couldn't think of anything good to put there, and had to settle for this (oh, do I know the feeling).
Lovely!
-Colleen
This poem is OK, I think I'm just struggling over whether I like the idea or not...I can't really comment on how it was written, since it wasn't horribly bad or anything. ^_~
Sorry, I seem to be no help.
It was good. The only thing that really bothered me was this part:
It seems awkwardly broken. To me, it seems smoother if it were just two lines instead of three, such as:
Putting it back with the rest of the poem, it doesn't really stick out, and it does appear to flow better. Change it if you agree. If not, I won't be too broken up *tear*.
Great job.
This is very good, a wonderful idea. One thing bothered me. In the last stanza, you simply said that it was man's own attempted chronicle and the whole stanza had a lovely imagery, but I think it ought to be "man's own attempted chronicle is. . ." and say something about it, rather than just stating what it was. Perhaps.
PS this is a wonderful poem, Cameron and the title gives it a whole second meaning. Bravo.