Hahaha! 
It's inescapable! 
But thanks. I'm currently working on a longer poem though. (I have a long one, it's I think under this section, it's called Gandalf and the Balrog)
The name pretty much sums it up. But then, I want peoples take on it. (Has anyone heard of the country mentioned, by-the-way? 
)
Peter Svacic
On Peter's Mount,
Svacic had passed:
Croatia's crowned,
And her valiant last.
(In Croatian; a little tid-bit, and appropriate, as it's patriotic)
Petar Svacic
Na Petrovu Goru,
Svacic je pao:
Kralj Hrvatske,
I njezin hrabar zadnji.
(note-the c's in Svacic are to be pronounced 'ch' as in 'church')
Hahaha!
It's inescapable! But thanks. I'm currently working on a longer poem though. (I have a long one, it's I think under this section, it's called Gandalf and the Balrog)
'Chottor modhe bhalo'(Umm.. Erethror,does that comment now sound different. .Just not to confuse you,I would better write the translation of what I wrote in my language,it means "SHORT AND SWEET") 
Oh I know, but its just that I get the same comment all the time 
...Oh I gues I can't complain can I?
Poetry is a candle, and prose is a fire in the hearth. We do not need a candle to be bright if we have many. Short and sweet is good, if the poem is good. Leave it be. Don't force your work.
I am noticing a pattern here....it seems my poems have a tendency, and I quote, of being 'short and sweet'. There's nothing bad about that, just it seems to follow most of my poems...(should I write longer ones, thus making them 'long and sweet'?)
And yes, King Peter was a real person, and ruled a real country by the name of Croatia.
120,147 Literary Works • 648,810 Reviews
Points: 890
Reviews: 126
Donate