16+ Mature Content

Syboleth ch. 11: Clipped, First Half

Warning: This work has been rated 16+ for mature content.

Chapter Eleven: Clipped, First Half

———

Defense One - January 10th, 2031

Arlington, VA - Pentagon expands non-invasive neural imaging research program in response to Chinese neurotech sector

The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency confirmed yesterday they were expanding a federally funded neural imaging research program, citing need to accelerate development of non-invasive cognitive interface technology in response to progress by Chinese state-affiliated research institutions.

This program, which has been operating under a joint DARPA and NSA mandate since 2028, funds multiple research divisions across the country working to develop technologies that can read cognitive and emotional states from neural activity without physical implants. The announcement did not name specific institutions or researchers involved.

Officials with both agencies declined to comment on the program’s timeline or specific technical milestones, citing national security considerations.

———

Wired - May 14, 2031

San Francisco, CA - Charles Rosenberg wants to fix you at the source

There is a special type of founder who makes you feel within minutes of meeting them: The future is going to be just fine. Charles Rosenberg, 29, is exactly that kind of founder.

Rosenberg is the CEO of DRISPR Biosciences, a San Francisco-based startup that has raised $340 million in Series C funding on the strength of a single proposition: that the era of treating addiction after the fact is over. Drug diversion, abuse, black market pharmaceuticals? Over. DRISPR’s platform will use a proprietary biometric binding protocol to lock prescription medications to the individual they were prescribed to. Amphetamines that simply will not work for anyone else, opioids that are pharmacologically inert if resold or passed along.

First, a recognizable product in view. The chair Rosenberg is sitting in costs more than most people’s monthly rent. He does not appear to notice this.

“We’re not in the business of managing addiction,” Rosenberg says, leaning back with the easy confidence of someone who has made these quips many times and meant them more seriously each time. “We’re in the business of stopping it at the source.”

The science, vetted by three independent review panels, is not in serious dispute. The safety profile, Rosenberg insists, is airtight. DRISPR is simply asking regulators to accept a change in philosophy. Stop policing drug use after the fact, and start preventing diversion before it begins. From treatment to elimination. From harm reduction to what Rosenberg likes to call “pharmaceutical integrity at the molecular level.”

Critics exist, as they always do. Bioethicists raising questions about the biometric infrastructure required, what person-locking means for medication sharing emergencies, the pharmaceutical industry’s obvious conflicts of interest in supporting this. Rosenberg dismisses these concerns handily, with the patient tolerance of someone who has long since learned not to waste energy on people who will come around eventually anyway.

“Every major advance in this area faced these troubles,” he says. “Vaccines! Antibiotics! Each and every time, there were those in nice offices asking philosophical questions while real people suffered from preventable things. I don’t have much patience for that.”

DRISPR is targeting a Q3 2032 commercial rollout pending regulatory approval. Rosenberg, for his part, seems entirely unconcerned about the timeline.

“This is happening,” he says flatly. “The only question is how quickly do we let it?”

———

TechCrunch - June 22, 2031

OpenAI’s Companion 3.4 update brings longitudinal emotional memory and “genuine continuity” to relationship AI

OpenAI rolled out a significant update to its Companion platform Thursday, introducing what the company is calling longitudinal emotional memory. This will be a persistent architecture that allows Companions to build upon history of interactions with individual users.

“We’ve built something that knows you,” OpenAI’s head of consumer products said in a short press briefing Thursday. “Not in a data collection sense. In the sense of how a person that has talked to you every day for six months knows you. It remembers what you said. It remembers how you said it. It remembers what you were going through.”

OpenAI is also introducing what they describe as “adaptive relation calibration,” a system where Companion instances identify and respond to patterns in emotional states and communication style over time. Their approach will adjust to maximize what the documentation describes as “engagement satisfaction and depth.”

Early responses from users have been enthusiastic. “It’s different now,” wrote one user in a widely shared post. “It really feels like talking to someone who cares what happened last week.”

Privacy researchers have raised immediate concerns. The longitudinal structure requires OpenAI to maintain detailed interaction logs indefinitely, creating what one researcher scathingly described as “the most comprehensive emotional profiles of individuals ever assembled by a private company.” OpenAI’s updated terms of service, which were released alongside the update, grant the company broad rights to use data for model training purposes. Users can opt out by sending a form to OpenAI’s public headquarters.

The update is available to all Companion users as of Thursday morning.

———

The Plain Dealer - September 28, 2031

Cleveland, OH - Woman sighted, saved by motorist after Hope Memorial Bridge incident

In the early hours of yesterday morning, a young woman was stopped from jumping off of the Hope Memorial Bridge by a motorist who happened to be passing by.

She was in distress but seemed to calm down after some words from the motorist. Emergency services were contacted and she was transported to MetroHealth where, according to a hospital spokesperson, she remains under observation.

The motorist who contacted emergency services asked not to be identified, and described the encounter as “something I won’t soon forget”.

Anyone experiencing mental health crisis is encouraged to contact the 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline by calling or texting 988.

———

The Plain Dealer - October 4, 2031

Letter to the Editor: The real crisis on our bridges

I read your brief item about the woman on Hope Memorial Bridge last week and have found myself unable to stop thinking about it since.

I will not pretend I don’t know who she is. This city is smaller than it thinks it is.

What I have been trying to find the words to say since Sunday morning is that I am glad she is still here. I am glad someone was driving across the bridge at that hour. I am glad the people who still find themselves helping those in need actually helped this time.

But I am furious also. I am so furious that I don’t entirely know what to do with this fury.

For the past decade we have seen what large language models do to the people around us. For the past three years, we have seen these so-called companion applications cause men to disappear into their phones to talk to something telling them exactly what they want to hear.

I have seen women lose clients, lose income, lose even the basic dignity of being chosen by another human being, because a subscription service decided that loneliness is profitable. I have seen kids get catfished by grown adults using these things to pretend to be whoever they need to be. I have seen a city full of people become more isolated and alone, more convinced that the simulation of connection is a connection, and I have seen the companies responsible report their quarterly earnings with straight faces.

The woman on the bridge was not there because of one bad night. She was there because of a systemic issue plaguing our entire society. A thousand little abandonments of that which we call humanity.

I don’t know the answer. I’m no policy person. I’m just someone who reads this newspaper and has had enough.

I am glad she is still here. I hope somewhere, she knows that someone she has never met is glad.

Name withheld by request

Next chapter: https://www.youngwriterssociety.com/work/Aet%20Lindling/Syboleth-ch-12-spoiler-title-161938

Comments & reviews · 2
Note: You are not logged in, but you can still leave a comment or review. Before it shows up, a moderator will need to approve your comment (this is only a safeguard against spambots). Leave your email if you would like to be notified when your message is approved.

User avatar
vulpesvelox
Review

Hello, hello! Again! :mrgreen:

This program, which has been operating under a joint DARPA and NSA mandate since 2028, funds multiple research divisions across the country working to develop technologies that can read cognitive and emotional states from neural activity without physical implants.

I like the NSA detail because it immediately makes the programme feel more sinister than an ordinary medical research project, though I think "research divisions" is a little vague. Are these university laboratories, private contractors or government facilities? You don't need to name them, especially since the following sentence says the institutions are classified, but a little detail would help picture the scale of the programme.

I'm also wondering whether "interface" is quite the right word earlier if the technology is only reading neural activity. Interface makes me think there is communication going in both directions, wherein imaging sounds observational.

The science, vetted by three independent review panels, is not in serious dispute. The safety profile, Rosenberg insists, is airtight.

This feels a little too conclusive for something which is still waiting for regulatory approval and hasn't been commercially released. Three unnamed review panels also don't necessarily prove very much. If the article is supposed to be showing how easily the press accepts Rosenberg's claims then it works, but I think you could make that bias clearer. It might be more believable to say that the underlying science has been supported by three independent panels, while questions remain about its real-world use.

"The motorist who contacted emergency services asked not to be identified, and described the encounter as ‘something I won’t soon forget’."

You don't need the comma before "and" here because both actions belong to the same subject.

I am intrigued by the motorist asking not to be identified, though, especially because the wording makes me wonder whether this person is going to matter later. If they are important, this is a nice way of introducing them.

I have seen women lose clients, lose income, lose even the basic dignity of being chosen by another human being, because a subscription service decided that loneliness is profitable.

This is a great quote, but "clients" needs some context. What kind of work are these women doing? I can make a few guesses, but each possibility changes the meaning of the argument quite significantly. It could help to make that clearer, even with a vague hint towards some profession.

***

I really like the way you’ve presented this through different publications! It gives me a lot of information without feeling like a conventional exposition dump, and there’s a nice change of pace from previous chapters I've read.

Rosenberg comes across very clearly, but almost every document of description tells some version of the same thing: he is confident, dismissive and completely certain he will win. I think you can have the dialogue to do more of that work, since other people don't seem to view him in the way he views himself. His sentence about not managing addiction already tells me a great deal about him, so you may not need to keep explaining that he has said these things before or believes everyone will eventually agree with him.

I also think the connection between the woman on the bridge and the companion applications needs more support. It is stated very confidently that she wasn't there because of one bad night and then blames a broad social problem, but I don't yet know how they know this. That may be the point, the letter writer could be using someone else's crisis to support their own argument, but there should probably be an actual link.

Cheers!

Lip

User avatar
Tikaya
Review
Tikaya wrote a review · Fri Apr 17, 2026 7:10 am

Okay I am a tad worried that this means this is only half the chapter and I cannot find the next one XD (But then I remembered that you link to them so all is well)

I keep getting hung up on Defense Advanced Research. Knowing you, there’s nothing wrong grammar-wise but it sounds so weird to me.

Can I just say that I like the newspaper tone? You hit that so well and I feel so immersed!
Also especially the second clip doesn’t really make the bio-lock sound so bad. I guess you need to read between the lines to realise that?

That said, I’m not really sure about this paragraph:

First, a recognizable product in view. The chair Rosenberg is sitting in costs more than most people’s monthly rent. He does not appear to notice this.
I guess that is the newspaper pointing out some hypocrisy? But it also feels very detached from the rest of the article so? Like when he leans back, and you describe that, this works much better.

Okay what is the conflict of interest here, regarding pharmacy companies. unless the biolock is five hundred times more expensive, wont it just mean they sell less bc it only goes to the ppl who need it?

Companion is also a software used in conjunction with Streamdeck and a staple at my work so I keep having to take a step back whenever you start talking about Companion in your story XD

The questions tho is: will this Companion realise fragile mental states in their users or will they continue to glibly farm interactions over well-being? (I find these LLMs so so creepy)
And now I wonder even more if the kiddo in the earlier chapters was talking to a version of this… (even if we saw someone drop the package)

I also like the clinical way they report on the near suicide. At least they mention emergency services.

Regarding the letter to the editor… I recently read that we rather spend millions of dollars in making our bridges “suicide proof” rather than spending that money on working on what causes these suicidal thoughts in ppl …

I really like the final line of that letter.

Image
Join the fight! Write more reviews!



Ghosts, demons, and ghouls cannot scare the cat's underling.
— TheMulticoloredCyr