Jack,
Heh. Heh.
Heh.
I see whut you did thurr. Clever beast. The poem is well planned out ideally, and I think it can work wonderfully - but the execution ultimately fails?
As I was reading your first and second stanzas, I just wanted to eat them and be like whut are you doing? Considering I had read two poems of yours already, and you get to this one, and you could hardly take it seriously with all the rhymes. I guess the gimmick of the pomp, the whistles, and the silverbells was the point all along, though, and thus the vomiting reactions to it was the reaction you intended for it.
ooo, you tricky beast. Always playing with them words, yo.
I do think the second shift of the poem needs to be...how do I say it? Make it read more raw, and more real? I want for this part to be gritty and vulnerable, and I see that you switch up your breaks without actually getting rid of the rhymes, but that's what I want! I want to see the rhymes gone completely, or else, what would be the point of this piece? What would be the point of the first two stanzas and the switch?
I thought to myself, it's past time to stopthe clock.Break the structures we have clung
to. Begin to confess: "Dear father, forgive me.
I am a secret sinner. I've whispered my prayersI've hid in the pews.
Yuck. Rhymes, yuck. Just ditch them. Give me something real. Don't give me glory or vagueness, give me something visceral, give me something breathing, something alive. Only then can I take the religion undertones and social commentary in this piece seriously.
I hope this helps.
~ as always, Audy
Points: 5533
Reviews: 696
Donate