Certain stories leave me reflecting again and again on their content, meaning, and greater implications. Rarely are these stories happy. This one falls into that category for me.
I've read it three or four times now and I admire all the subtleties. Several times Jay spots his reflection and tries to escape it, or feels unsettled by it. Without saying the words, we know he's on medication. Without saying it, we know something happened which sent him on a spiral. I think these things hold power because they're not directly addressed.
Jay is a honest-to-God toxic person, but this is the first story I've ever read which injects humanity into his kind of person (and does it without trying to forcefully elicit sympathy). He's not a sociopath, though. There's a point where he has pity for his cat, but then feels "relief" when class is dismissed and he doesn't have to deal with that emotion anymore. He admires a piece of art, but automatically wants to detest it. He posts revolting, downright malicious comments on Facebook in order to spurn excitement and adrenaline in himself, and is very aware of why he's saying these things and what effect they have on him. What this tells me is that he's both uncomfortable with emotions, but also craves them. He wants to feel, but he wants to feel only what he wants to feel and on his terms. From a psychological standpoint, to me this indicates trauma. There are countless other pieces of evidence hinting to Jay's various qualities, offering clues to his past and present, but I won't go into all of them. Just know that, as a reader, I'm intrigued enough to be looking for them.
I think that using second person was very effective here. The reader (in most cases) is going to want to be isolated from Jay, so forcing them to view the world from his perspective is uncomfortable. That you can make the reader experience such a powerful emotion so vividly is skillful on your part.
I only have a few minor nitpicks here. Twice in Jay's internal monologue, you use "god" instead of "God." I guess you could justify it by saying it's his writing style, but to me it was just distracting.
I also think you could make a few tweaks in formatting to make the story feel more finished. The quote from Gandhi, for example, could be indented. I would like to see your page breaks centered and/or represented by something other than asterisks with no spaces between them. These are minor things but they'd polish the final result.
Overall though, this feels like a well-done, finished piece. I definitely think there's more than meets the eye on this story, and it's one I'm going to remember. I once got a piece of writing advice from someone I admire -- "Write for your perfect audience." No story is going to appeal to everyone, so instead of writing a story that a lot of people will kind of like, write the story that a few people (your "perfect audience") will love. It takes a lot of guts and emotional depth to write a story about a character that most readers will universally hate. But for me, these are the stories that mean something. I feel like I'm a member of your "perfect audience" in this case.
Keep writing.
Joe
Points: 965
Reviews: 27
Donate