Ooh, this one is really depressing. I know how positive you are, generally, so to hear the end of this poem -- the denouncement of all of the hopes and aspirations of these people, is really shocking. Their hearts are made of coal? There's no potential for redemption? It makes me wonder what the children's hearts are made of.
I like the philosophy behind this. I really do. It's awesome because it takes a personal point of view to look out into the oblivion of future and unknown, and time rushing on. It tastes a little bit like thinking about environmental issues: how do I save the future for you? It's an important and emotional topic.
However, just hitting the general ideas about a topic isn't really what makes a memorable poem. Do you want to write a poem that hits someone so hard they have to do something about it? Then you need to evoke emotion and understanding UNDER their skin. When you generalize, you activate just an academic understanding of the situation. But that doesn't get in me. It doesn't move me. I wonder what this poem would read like if you brought in a scene or specific characters to give a voice to this same philosophy. I remember one night after watching Ferngully when my dad said he really hoped there would be a rainforest left for me to go to when I grew up. We cried together though I didn't really understand why. Does that move you? Does it fit with the idea you're working on for this? If so, you can see the power of specifics. If not, try experimenting with it yourself. I may just not have hit something that rings with you.
I hope you take another look at this poem. I'd love to talk with you, too, if you have any questions or comments about my review.
Good luck and keep writing, sunshine!
Points: 25864
Reviews: 1334
Donate