z

Young Writers Society


short and sweet or long and strong



Random avatar


Gender: None specified
Points: 300
Reviews: 0
Tue Nov 18, 2014 2:50 am
Que94 says...



I am a romance poet and I normally write poems that are average of 20 lines. But yea I would like to know which type of poetry would ppl prefer, a long or short?
  





User avatar
933 Reviews

Supporter


Gender: Female
Points: 4261
Reviews: 933
Tue Nov 18, 2014 3:13 am
View Likes
Iggy says...



It varies, honestly! Some prefer long, some prefer small. I can't really speak for everyone, but I like a medium. :)
“I can't go back to yesterday because I was a different person then."
- Lewis Carroll
  





User avatar
1274 Reviews

Supporter


Gender: Female
Points: 35799
Reviews: 1274
Tue Nov 18, 2014 3:18 am
View Likes
niteowl says...



Hi there Que and welcome to YWS!

I'd say it depends, though honestly I'm more inclined to read short pieces as I'm turned off by seeing large blocks of words. But I might just be lazy. ;)

Sometimes you just need a few lines to express an idea. Other times, it needs to be much longer. I'm guessing that "When is it long enough?" is something every poet has to ask at some point.

As a longtime reviewer, I'm more likely to suggest cutting superfluous words than adding them. Yet as a writer, I like to ramble and don't want to cut anything. Go figure. :P
"You do ill if you praise, but worse if you censure, what you do not understand." Leonardo Da Vinci

<YWS><R1>
  





Random avatar


Gender: None specified
Points: 300
Reviews: 0
Tue Nov 18, 2014 4:43 am
Que94 says...



Thank u both :)
  





User avatar
696 Reviews

Supporter


Gender: Female
Points: 5533
Reviews: 696
Tue Nov 18, 2014 4:54 am
Audy says...



I'm going to echo Nite - I'm prone to cutting anything superfluous in a "say it once, say it right" kind of way. In essence, boiling down to the root of the poem. Why take three lines to describe the exact color, texture, and shape of a tree, when one line will do?

However, I would say when the urge to ramble as a writer strikes you and cutting lines just won't do, my next suggestion is to simply make me care as a reader. Longer poems should engage and excite us towards the ending, it should make us read further and we should enjoy the journey - not make us skim because it has a boring middle that we must slog through. Likewise, short poems should make us want to wish to read more, or read it over and over again. Engagement is essential to both :)
  





User avatar
382 Reviews



Gender: Female
Points: 15691
Reviews: 382
Tue Nov 18, 2014 10:44 am
Dreamy says...



I agree with the other three- it completely depends on the reader's liking. For me, I find poems with repetitive lines to be intriguing. I have a personal theory on the repetition like; once you understand the objective of your poem and repeat it with different varieties of metaphors...like for example a man's love can be said crisply in four lines but that to me, it doesn't linger enough to brood and dream about his love. Anything that's long, draggy, sometimes the long poems can also be boring but how I see them is that maybe the guy is simply bored of loving or begging to be loved.

But that's just me. ;)

Oh yea, welcome to YWS! :D
If any person raises his hand to strike down another on the ground of religion, I shall fight him till the last breath of my life, both as the head of the Government and from outside- Jawaharlal Nehru.
  








A big mountain of sugar is too much for one man. I can see now why God portions it out in those little packets.
— Homer Simpson