z

Young Writers Society


U.S. Supreme Court Overturns Violent Video Games Ban



User avatar
425 Reviews



Gender: Male
Points: 11417
Reviews: 425
Mon Jun 27, 2011 5:04 pm
View Likes
Nate says...



Earlier this morning, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned a ban on the sale of violent video games to minors in California.

Court: Calif. can't ban violent video game sales

By JESSE J. HOLLAND, Associated Press

WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court on Monday refused to let California clamp down on the sale or rental of violent video games to children, saying governments lack authority to "restrict the ideas to which children may be exposed" despite complaints that the popular and fast-changing technology allows the young to simulate acts of brutality.

On a 7-2 vote, the high court upheld a federal appeals court decision to throw out California's ban on the sale or rental of violent video games to minors. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Sacramento had ruled that the law violated minors' rights under the First Amendment, and the high court agreed.

"No doubt a state possesses legitimate power to protect children from harm," said Justice Antonin Scalia, who wrote the majority opinion. "But that does not include a free-floating power to restrict the ideas to which children may be exposed."

Video game makers and sellers celebrated their victory, saying the decision puts them on the same legal footing as other forms of entertainment. "There now can be no argument whether video games are entitled to the same protection as books, movies, music, and other expressive entertainment," said Bo Andersen, president and CEO of the Entertainment Merchants Association.


Full Story at Yahoo News

This is important because no other form of entertainment (aside from adult entertainment) faced such a ban. A few may note that a minor cannot buy a rated-R ticket at a movie theater, but that's due to an agreement between the MPAA and movie theaters. There is actually no law prohibiting the sale of a rated-R ticket to anyone.
  





User avatar
36 Reviews



Gender: None specified
Points: 13613
Reviews: 36
Tue Jun 28, 2011 4:19 pm
tr3x says...



Yes, this is definitely a victory for the gaming industry. I recently had a debate about a similar issue - whether game developers should qualify for art subsidies - and I really do think video games qualify for the freedom of expression protected under the First Amendment. The argument that violence in games encourages real life violence is silly and fallacious. True, kids should be protected from graphic violence until they can deal with it, but that should be in the hands of the parents, not the government. I find it sad that governments are trying to restrict what their citizens can and cannot see.
A lie can run around the world before the truth has got its boots on.
- Terry Pratchett

Si non confectus, non recifiat - If it ain't broken, don't fix it.
  





User avatar
36 Reviews



Gender: None specified
Points: 13613
Reviews: 36
Sat Jul 02, 2011 10:23 pm
tr3x says...



Incredibly relevant.
A lie can run around the world before the truth has got its boots on.
- Terry Pratchett

Si non confectus, non recifiat - If it ain't broken, don't fix it.
  








It's kind of fun to do the impossible.
— Walt Disney