A Wrinkle in Time

18 posts1, 2
User avatar
Gender Female
Points 890
Reviews 99
I haven't seen a review for this book, which I found strange, so I made one. It seems fitting. Madeleine L'Engle, the author, recently passed away on September 6th at the age of 88.

Here's the intro for the book's article on Wikipedia. It kinda gives you an idea of its achievements. (Don't the best books always get rejected in the beginning? Man, I feel sorry for those publishers... :wink: )

A Wrinkle in Time is a science fantasy[1] novel by Madeleine L'Engle, written between 1959 and 1960[2] and published in 1962 after at least 26 rejections by publishers[3] because it was, in L'Engle's words, "too different". The book went on to win a Newbery Medal, Sequoyah Book Award, and Lewis Carroll Shelf Award, and was runner-up for the Hans Christian Andersen Award.[4] It is the first in L'Engle's series of books about the Murry and O'Keefe families.


This story follows the adventure of Meg, her younger brother Charles Wallace, and a friend named Calvin O'Keefe. Meg's father was a scientist for the American government. Several years ago he was sent on a secret mission and never returned. This disappearance wounds Meg so that she is prone to outburst and rebellion, and Charles Wallace talks to no one outside the family.

One day, after meeting Calvin, Charles Wallace leads them to an abandoned shack where Mrs Whatsit, Mrs who, and Mrs Which reside. These three ladies are in fact immortal beings who take the three children on a quest to rescue their father and save a planet from the growing Darkness known as IT.

Of course, I can't ruin the story. I'll just say that the characters are real and touchable, the reader feels with and for them. The places, 2d planets and paraidises, are unforgettable. And, this story is in no way generic. It is original, engaging, and, if you read it, it will travel with you forever.

There are religious overtones in A Wrinkle in Time. Here, another Wikipedia quote.

L'Engle's liberal Christianity is unsettling to some. This novel is on the American Library Association list of the 100 Most Frequently Challenged Books of 1990–2000 at number 22.[6] Reasons given include the book's references to witches and crystal balls[7] (although the characters are not in fact witches, and the crystal ball is a science fictional one), the claim that it "challenges religious beliefs"[8], and the listing of Jesus "with the names of great artists, philosophers, scientists, and religious leaders.


Along with the spiritual perspective, the book contains several interesting scientific aspects.

1. Computers. They were not invented at the time of the novel's publication, but in the book, while confronting IT, the children see rows and rows of machines, computing numbers and calculations. Computers.

2. Tesseract. This refers to the theory of traveling almost instantaneously to another place in the universe. The dimension of time is bunched together, and, instead of traveling the entire line, the traveler has only to go from end to end. By creating "a wrinkle in time", the children are transported to other planets. This is a conceivable idea of physics, but, is currently only in fiction.

Finally, I love this book. It comforts me and when I read it, it says that hope and love can defeat evil. So, go read it!
Last edited by alleycat13 on Sat Nov 10, 2007 8:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Calvin : You can't just turn on creativity like a faucet. You have to be in the right mood.
Hobbes : What mood is that?
Calvin : Last-minute panic.

Got YWS?




User avatar
Gender Female
Points 5890
Reviews 758
I am a fan. *huggles A Wrinkle In Time*
"My pet, I've been to the devil, and he's a very dull fellow. I won't go there again, even for you..."




User avatar
Gender Female
Points 1090
Reviews 241
i LOVE A Wrinkle in Time. and I am a Christian who LOVES a Wrinkle in Time. I thought they were wonderful books. they actually strengthened my faith, they didn't really challenge it. *shrug*
“We’re still here,” he says, his voice cold, his hands shaking. “We know how to be invisible, how to play dead. But at the end of the day, we are still here.” ~Dax

Teacher: "What do we do with adjectives in Spanish?"
S: "We eat them!"




User avatar
Gender Female
Points 890
Reviews 99
they actually strengthened my faith, they didn't really challenge it.


Oh, I certainly agree with you. This story doesn't challenge Christianity as much as it does Orthodox rules-->putting other philosophers on level with Jesus, using "magic" and "witches" (which, they definitely were not)ect.

Some people are very narrow-minded. I love Madeleine's views though.
Calvin : You can't just turn on creativity like a faucet. You have to be in the right mood.
Hobbes : What mood is that?
Calvin : Last-minute panic.

Got YWS?




User avatar
Gender Female
Points 890
Reviews 29
Hmmm...I tried reading it a few years back, but maybe I just wasn't ready for it...maybe I'll try it again ;-)

Isn't it sad when such good writers die in present time? I mean, Madeline L'Engel and Robert Jordan in one year...and I might be forgetting others...

~Deoris
'"Many years ago, when I was young, I saw a fire, and what looked like death-- and beyond that, in the dark places, something...or some One, who knew me. Shall I at last find my way back to that wonderworld of Night?"'




User avatar
Gender Female
Points 1090
Reviews 241
alleycat13 wrote:
they actually strengthened my faith, they didn't really challenge it.


Oh, I certainly agree with you. This story doesn't challenge Christianity as much as it does Orthodox rules-->putting other philosophers on level with Jesus, using "magic" and "witches" (which, they definitely were not)ect.

Some people are very narrow-minded. I love Madeleine's views though.


absolutely. they're allegorical. they're not encouraging kids to go call up demons and dead people. *rolls eyes*
“We’re still here,” he says, his voice cold, his hands shaking. “We know how to be invisible, how to play dead. But at the end of the day, we are still here.” ~Dax

Teacher: "What do we do with adjectives in Spanish?"
S: "We eat them!"




User avatar
Gender Female
Points 1807
Reviews 157
I thought that it was.... different. I really liked it though, it was written beautifully, but if it weren't, I'd probably think it was a little too strange for my taste. I don't know, that was a while ago, i should read it again.




User avatar
Gender Female
Points 890
Reviews 99
OnCeUpOnAtIm3Xo wrote:I don't know, that was a while ago, i should read it again.


Everyone, and every book, deserves a second chance. :wink:
Calvin : You can't just turn on creativity like a faucet. You have to be in the right mood.
Hobbes : What mood is that?
Calvin : Last-minute panic.

Got YWS?




User avatar
Gender None specified
Points 8413
Reviews 816
I adore this book. I read it first when I was little, and it took me a while to figure out what the wrinkle in time referred to, lol. Like all my favorite books, it's something I can come back to again and again, and always find something new.




User avatar
Gender Female
Points 5533
Reviews 696
I remember reading it when I was little and then stopping about half-way and never finishing it, no matter how much I went back to it. I don't know what it was about it that I didn't like, but when I finally finished it I was just so astounded by it, it was so beautifully written. I admire Madeleine L'Engle.




User avatar
Gender Non-binary
Points 1979
Reviews 1176
I read it ages ago, and to be frank, I was rather freaked out by it. Maybe I should try reading it again, though.
"TV makes sense. It has logic, structure, rules, and likeable leading men. In life, we have this. We have you." -Abed Nadir




User avatar
Gender Female
Points 890
Reviews 99
I was rather freaked out by it
It is different, twit, but that's what makes it so good.

Like I told OnCeUpOnAtIm3Xo, give it another try. I'm 99.9% sure you'll like it. 8)
Calvin : You can't just turn on creativity like a faucet. You have to be in the right mood.
Hobbes : What mood is that?
Calvin : Last-minute panic.

Got YWS?




User avatar
Gender Female
Points 5890
Reviews 280
alleycat13 wrote:
OnCeUpOnAtIm3Xo wrote:I don't know, that was a while ago, i should read it again.


Everyone, and every book, deserves a second chance. :wink:

[s]Eragon is the only exception to that.[/s] :P

"A Wrinkle in Time" is lovely. And that's all I can say -- everyone else has beat me to it. :P
ohmeohmy




User avatar
Gender Female
Points 890
Reviews 99
Sumi H. Inkblot wrote:[s]Eragon is the only exception to that.[/s] :P

Lol, agreed.
Calvin : You can't just turn on creativity like a faucet. You have to be in the right mood.
Hobbes : What mood is that?
Calvin : Last-minute panic.

Got YWS?




User avatar
Gender Male
Points 890
Reviews 141
I like that book. It's much better than the other ones.
Voldemort: You kids! If I ever find out who's calling I will tell the wizard law and you will go to wizard jail and then I'll kill you!

Harry Potter Puppet Pals - Wizard Swears



We are great at fearing the wrong things.
— Hank Green