z

Young Writers Society


Changing Chat-rooms?



User avatar
425 Reviews



Gender: Male
Points: 11417
Reviews: 425
Tue Mar 09, 2010 7:26 am
Nate says...



Short Version

YWS will be switching to the old chat from sometime this Wednesday through the weekend. If the site doesn't slow down while using it, we're going to switch back to it.


Long Version

Currently, the Young Writers Society chat-room is managed by a company called TopCCM and the program itself is called 123 Flashchat. It has a lot of benefits, and I know a lot of people like it. Unfortunately, it also costs $30 a month. Thus over the course of a year, the 123 Flashchat costs YWS $360. Are the benefits worth that much? Maybe.

Before 123 Flashchat, YWS used another chat program called Flashchat and managed by Tufat. To avoid confusion, I'm just going to call the current chat "current chat" and the old chat "old chat". In any case, YWS used the old chat for about two years. It's biggest strength? It was free.

If you weren't around for the old chat, you may be asking yourself, "Why did YWS switch from something that was free to something that costs $30 a month?". It's a good question and the reason is simple: lag. The current chat is remotely hosted. This means it never lags and never causes the site to slow down.

The old chat, though, was hosted on the YWS server. Worse, it was badly designed so it didn't use system resources effectively. This meant that it lagged whenever 15+ people were in the room. If 20+ people were in the room, the entire site slowed down. If 25+ people were in the room, the site effectively shut down. That obviously was a problem and why we switched to a chat that costs $30 a month.

However, the makers of the old chat (Tufat) have released a new version that supposedly makes better use of system resources. This means it shouldn't lag as much. We'll see if that's true or not.

Starting sometime on Wednesday, the current chat will be replaced with the old chat (albeit a newer version of the old chat). This will last through the weekend if everything goes well. If the site does not slow down while the old chat is running, we'll switch back to it. If however the site does slow down, then we'll stick with the current chat.

Just to sum up, I know a number of you may be unhappy about all this. But you have to think, do the benefits add up to $360 a year?
  





User avatar
1259 Reviews

Supporter


Gender: Male
Points: 18178
Reviews: 1259
Tue Mar 09, 2010 10:58 am
Firestarter says...



The chat is dead. Long live the chat.
Nate wrote:And if YWS ever does become a company, Jack will be the President of European Operations. In fact, I'm just going to call him that anyways.
  





User avatar
896 Reviews

Supporter


Gender: Female
Points: 240
Reviews: 896
Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:17 pm
PenguinAttack says...



O Captain my Captain.

Chat is chat however you look at it.
I like you as an enemy, but I love you as a friend.
  





User avatar
2631 Reviews

Supporter


Gender: Female
Points: 6235
Reviews: 2631
Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:32 pm
Rydia says...



I'm happy to switch back to the old chat. I haven't used the new chat very much so it's still the most familiar of the two XD
Writing Gooder

~Previously KittyKatSparklesExplosion15~

The light shines brightest in the darkest places.
  





User avatar
1464 Reviews

Supporter


Gender: Female
Points: 83957
Reviews: 1464
Tue Mar 09, 2010 2:46 pm
JabberHut says...



I can has gag!
I make my own policies.
  





User avatar
78 Reviews



Gender: Female
Points: 1854
Reviews: 78
Tue Mar 09, 2010 2:51 pm
Theodorable says...



I have actually been having problems getting on the new chat. I'd be happy switching back to the old one.
Driver picks the music, shotgun shuts his cake hole. -Dean, Supernatural
  





User avatar
563 Reviews



Gender: Female
Points: 13816
Reviews: 563
Tue Mar 09, 2010 2:54 pm
Writersdomain says...



Sounds like a good plan, Nate! :wink:
~ WD
If you desire a review from WD, post here

"All I know, all I'm saying, is that a story finds a storyteller. Not the other way around." ~Neverwas
  





User avatar
1272 Reviews



Gender: Other
Points: 89625
Reviews: 1272
Tue Mar 09, 2010 4:28 pm
Rosendorn says...



I wouldn't mind switching back to the old Chat. My only question is about logs. As in, how easy would it be to get them?
A writer is a world trapped in a person— Victor Hugo

Ink is blood. Paper is bandages. The wounded press books to their heart to know they're not alone.
  





User avatar
245 Reviews



Gender: Other
Points: 2570
Reviews: 245
Tue Mar 09, 2010 10:17 pm
LowKey says...



As in, how easy would it be to get them?


^^ Exactly the same. I love the idea of switching back to the old chat as much as I love the current chat, meaning I'm happy either way. The only hang up is in the availability of logs, especially concerning events that occurred/started prior to entrance.
Necropolis SB / Necropolis DT

Once was Dreamer, is now LowKey_Lyesmith.

Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.
  





User avatar
373 Reviews



Gender: None specified
Points: 49068
Reviews: 373
Tue Mar 09, 2010 10:23 pm
Kamas says...



Old chat! Hurray!
"Nothing is permanent in this wicked world - not even our troubles." ~ Charles Chaplin

#tnt
  





User avatar
425 Reviews



Gender: Male
Points: 11417
Reviews: 425
Tue Mar 09, 2010 10:38 pm
Nate says...



The logs weren't publicly available with the old chat because the administrative interface and the logs were inseparable; meaning that in order to have access to one, you had to have access to the other.

However, the good thing about the old chat is that if there's something we don't like, I actually have the ability to do something about it. Looking over it, it'd be very easy to create something that would make the chat logs publicly available.

But before I do, I have to ask: how often does anyone even use the chat logs? I'm kind of suspicious that very few (if any) do because the current chat has been archiving the chat logs in a very non-user-friendly way for a while now. If when you say "chat log" you're just referring to the public log available via one button in chat, then there's nothing to worry about. Unlike the current chat, the old chat keeps all messages viewable from the moment you enter chat.

So while it is easy to fix, I'd prefer not to do it unless necessary.
  





User avatar
373 Reviews



Gender: None specified
Points: 49068
Reviews: 373
Tue Mar 09, 2010 10:44 pm
Kamas says...



I think the use of the logs is specifically for the chat mods, when a situation arises.
I know I used them before they were a pain to look through.
"Nothing is permanent in this wicked world - not even our troubles." ~ Charles Chaplin

#tnt
  





User avatar
537 Reviews



Gender: Female
Points: 60568
Reviews: 537
Tue Mar 09, 2010 10:49 pm
Evi says...



Sounds good to me.
"Let's eat, Grandma!" as opposed to "Let's eat Grandma!": punctuation saves lives.
  





User avatar
1272 Reviews



Gender: Other
Points: 89625
Reviews: 1272
Tue Mar 09, 2010 11:04 pm
Rosendorn says...



Right. Forgotten that the old chat stores all messages. That answers my question, then. :)
A writer is a world trapped in a person— Victor Hugo

Ink is blood. Paper is bandages. The wounded press books to their heart to know they're not alone.
  





User avatar
373 Reviews



Gender: None specified
Points: 49068
Reviews: 373
Wed Mar 10, 2010 3:51 am
Kamas says...



Two things:

#1: Chat is not working for me. (Is it because I have a Macbook?)

#2: The link on the front page is the wrong link.
"Nothing is permanent in this wicked world - not even our troubles." ~ Charles Chaplin

#tnt
  








Don't aim at success--the more you aim at it and make it a target, the more you are going to miss it. For success, like happiness, cannot be pursued; it must ensue, and it only does so as the unintended side-effect of one's dedication to a cause greater than oneself or as the by-product of one's surrender to a person other than oneself.
— Viktor E. Frankl