z
Firestarter wrote:BTW Shes NZs Queen too and although the royal family don't seem to do much, I think the royals provide a sense of stability or something like that. They can't be utterly useless or they would have been gotten rid of by now (maybe like they got rid of Charles I)
Stability? But the same stability can be gained from having a President as a Head of State who is cheaper for our country. The money can go into improving our public transport and health care. They only haven't been got ridden of by now because we're so stuck up with traditions and people think the Royal Family are "british" and so we should stick with them. It didn't work getting rid of Charles I because in those days having a monarchy was useful, these days it's not.
Canada's head-of-state is the Queen. She's on our pennies... and stuff. o_0 I don't think Canada ever had a big "independance" thing like the US, so while laws and constitutions can be ratified and whatnot by the Canadian Parliament, the "official" head figure of the country is still Elizabeth II.
Hm..
And Firestarter: you don't want a president if he/she has a chance of turning out like ours. Evil or Very Mad Sorry, I won't say anymore, I just wanted to point that out.
Nate wrote:As it regards snow, Washington DC is famous for completely shutting down for just one snowflake. We have plenty of snow plows, though, so I think it has more to do with congressmen just trying to get out of work.
Anyway, excuse me, I have to go start something on fire to keep from freezing.
Gender:
Points: 3941
Reviews: 488