Yeah, I'm with you guys. Just looking at the page before this and seeing Lord of the Rings, Moby Dick and Huckleberry Finn - three spectacular novels, with Moby being widely regarded as the finest novel ever written - makes me sad.
There's no reason to be sad...I mean you can expect everyone to love a book, be it classic or not. Everyone has different tastes. Like, I know I loved The Great Gatsby, Lolita, Animal Farm, and 1984 and I know people who absolutely hated them. I think they're brilliant, but I don't find it upsetting that people hate them. It's all a matter of opinion. I love reading, but just because I don't enjoy a couple of classics doesn't mean that I have silly opinions. Just my two cents.
Do you want a critique by Dahlia? If so, Click here!
Dahlia >> I don't think people are sad/concerned that others dislike classics. If anything, that's kind of inevitable with any group of people. I think it's problematic though that people are calling them the worst books ever.
"He yanked himself free and fled to the kitchen where something huddled against the flooded windowpanes. It sighed and wept and tapped continually, and suddenly he was outside, staring in, the rain beating, the wind chilling him, and all the candle darkness inside lost."
I don't think you should be complaining on a fully opinionated thread. It's not the person's fault that they dislike a book you enjoyed. It's all what they thought. Not what they thought others would react in a pleasing manner towards.
And while I'm here,
I absolutely hated a Certain Slant of Light. Worst book in the world in my opinion.
“One sees clearly only with the heart. Anything essential is invisible to the eyes” ~ The Little Prince~
I won't lie, I found Jane Austen's 'Emma' to be a terrible bore.
However, the worst book I've read is probably 'Brisingr' by Chris Paolini. I read on after Eragon out of sheer curiosity as to whether the man would actually bother improving/put down his copies of LOTR and think up his own damn ideas. I was wrong.
Ah, but see--while Emma may be boring (not to me, but I know others don't like more archaic styles), it's not a bad book. It's actually very subtly done with a lot of attention to detail.
But I agree. Paolini is crap.
For me, the worst book I've ever read has to be... anything by Mercedes Lackey. I liked her a lot when I was in elementary/middle school, but I picked one of my favorites up a few months ago and almost cried. It's horrible.
Yes paolini is terrible.
and icaruss, it's called an opinion.
I don't agree with dick and huck fin but I thought the lord of the rings books were terrible. like filing a tax report. however, I loved the hobbit, I just hated the style tolkein wrote in for LOTR.
Paolini: it helps getting famous when your parents OWN the company that publishes your books.
No Time To Say Goodbye was a so-so thriller, but put it this way, I could have read the thing and worked out the plot even if I was sitting in a lift going up and down on the sharp end of a broom, wearing a pair of black out glasses.
What utter tosh.
We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars.