Tragic Women

3 posts
User avatar
Gender Female
Points 890
Reviews 71
Tragic Women

In Greek society, the theater blended history, art, and social gatherings in one seamless performance. In many ways, the theater was a revered art form, and indeed many classic stories were made for the Greek stage. Oedipus the King, Medea, and Agamemnon are three such stories. These three Greek plays were all tragedies, and in each story the women characters within the play enhanced the element of tragedy. By understanding the role each woman played, and by comparing and contrasting these roles, we can better understand the brilliance of Greek tragedy, and ultimately appreciate the art of Greek theater.
In the play Medea, the character Medea is both the victim and the victimizer. This provides an interesting element to the tragedy because it gives the reader, or the listener, a feeling of conflict. Therefore, instead of a happy man falling into misery, you have a character that is already miserable who increases her own misery in order to make someone else miserable, in this case her unfaithful husband Jason. Medea provides a picture of the ultimate tragic figure. Because her husband was unfaithful, Medea was placed into a set of tragic circumstances that she herself could not control, but because she murdered her husband’s wife and her own children in order to ruin Jason‘s happiness, she destroyed her credibility as a victim. So, yes, Medea was ruined but she responded unporportionately. One of the interesting things to note about the play Medea is the fact that Jason’s new wife is not victimized. Although Jason’s wife is not responsible for the torture she received, or her ultimate death, the audience is unfazed, if not a bit sickened, at her passing. Therefore, Medea remains the tragic figure, yet she is the villain. The unique role of Medea really changed and enhanced the concept of tragedy.
The play Agamemnon is like the play Medea because it shares a common theme of revenge. When Agamemnon returns home after ten years of war, he is greeted by his wife Clytemnestra who secretly seeks to kill him. While Agamemnon has brought home a war bride, and had previously sacrificed their daughter, it is not Clytemnestra who is victimized. When Clytemnestra and her lover murder Agamemnon while he is bathing, the pity goes not toward Clytemnestra or even Agamemnon, but to the war bride Cassandra. This contrast from the story of Medea is probably because in Agamemnon Cassandra is able to voice her opinions and situation to the audience. Therefore, Cassandra strikes pity where Jason’s wife did not because the audience could relate to her on a more personal level. The story leaves Clytemnestra as the villain, for she made Cassandra once again unwanted and an outcast.
The tragic role of the women in Oedipus the King is strikingly different from that of the two other plays. In this story, the theme is that of horrific discovery, and the women add to the sense of revulsion and loss. When the audience discovers that Jocasta is both the wife and mother of Oedipus there is an immediate sense of repulsion. Certainly, there is a sense of pity for the character, but it seems as if the pity is overridden by disgust. In this play, Jocasta is not the main tragic figure. Even when Jocasta hangs herself, the sympathy is directed more towards her husband. While the audience understands Oedipus to be the main tragic figure, it seems that Oedipus himself feels most sorry for his two daughters who will not be able to marry. The daughters are a perfect example of complete innocence in a tragic situation, and because they are women, the audience recognizes that they will be unable to leave their sad situation.
The Greek playwrights knew how to use the special role of women to enhance their tragedies. Every woman character, from powerful Medea to ignorant Jocasta, left a unique imprint on the legend of Greek tragedy. By recognizing the oppressive condition Greek women lived in, the playwrights were able to realistically bring elements of revenge, discovery, and helplessness into their plays. Only by understanding the role of each woman in these tragedies can we gain an appreciation for the various ways in which the element of tragedy was enhanced.

_________________________________

Okay, so this is my essay that needs some help. I always do my best grammatically, however I am not very good. I really need A LOT of constructive feedback because it really is hard to edit your own essays. I would really appreciate ANY constructive crit, and you don't have to be familiar with the three plays in order to help. Thank you!




User avatar
Gender Male
Points 3965
Reviews 152
"These three Greek plays were all tragedies"

when you talk about Greek Plays, you speak in the present tense becasue they still exist in the same form as they were originally written. When talking of religion you speak in the past tense because Ancient Greek Religion is no longer followed.

"women characters within the play enhanced the element of tragedy. By understanding the role each woman played,"
mention the names of the female character's you're talking about. This is an neccesity in an introduction.

"Therefore, instead of a happy man...increases her own..."
If you're talking about Medea, refer to her as a female. Don't raise the fact that females receive lesser roles in the same sentence as when you're talking about her dual-nature (if that's what you intended).

"So, yes, Medea"
informal and improper for an essay

"responded unporportionately"
unproportionately is not a word. choose either out of proportion, or disproportionately.

"The unique role of Medea really changed and enhanced the concept of tragedy."
this highlights one of the hang-ups I have with your essay. Use concluding sentences to expound on your ideas clearly, concisely and completely. What you have is ambiguous, uninformative and unclear.

"The play Agamemnon is like the play Medea because it shares a common theme of revenge"
Use the weapon you have here in an opening and comparative sentence - The play Agammemnon shares the theme of revenge with the play Medea but/and (expound on the similar/different way it is presented)

"is probably because"
too indecicive for a formal essay, stick to your guns, something either is, isn't or can be interpreted as.

""The Greek playwrights"
Call them by name

My small issue with this essay is that it seems fairly short, but I'm not sure how much you're expected to write. My big issue with this essay is your lack of quotes to back up your arguments, use them as evidence!

For further reading on a character both tragic and villainous, see Pentheus in The Bacchae, and Antigone and Creon in Antigone

Now I've focussed on the grammar and generic Ancient Greek Theatre qualities because I haven't read any of your plays. Without boasting I'm good at classical studies and am thinking of tutoring it at my local high school. IF you want help with further essays for this or other histories or english, please pm me as you'll be doing me a favour by keeping my skills up.

Cheerio,
Rubric
So you're going to kill a god. Sure. But what happens next?

Diary of a Deicide, Part One.


Got YWS?




User avatar
Gender Female
Points 890
Reviews 71
Thank you for your help. I hate writing essays, and it is short but that was our limit- he said he would fail us if we made it any longer, and he hates quotes from the stories he says, "they just waste space". I have a hard time writing for him because he is so different form every other teacher I have had to write essays for. Its really hard for me to cough up his essays, so any help grammatically is a real blessing. Thank you!



'Hush, hush!' I whispered; 'people can have many cousins and of all sorts, Miss Cathy, without being any the worse for it; only they needn't keep their company, if they be disagreeable and bad.
— Emily Bronte, Wuthering Heights