Questions

17 posts1, 2
User avatar
Gender Male
Points 890
Reviews 115
This is hard for me to review this.

Yeah, it is sweet. Of course it is sweet, but everybody can be sweet, right? And is it well written? It's not bad. It's not special. It is pleasant. But is it good? I mean, do I read this thinking: "Oh, man, this is fantastic"? Or do I read this thinking: "This isn't bad, but I can't wait for it to be done"?

I mean, look, I know you never claimed you'd be fantastic. I know you never even claimed to be good. But this is the kind of story that anybody can write, and even if they have the skill and the grammar of a nine year old, it'll still have people drooling over it. Why? Because they are mistaking that fuzzy feeling they get on their gut towards the end of the story for good storytelling. I'm not saying your piece is bad. It's not bad at all, but like I said, it's not special either. The thing is that when you write about your blind brother, and you talk about the sister explaining what stars are like, you're gonna get people saying: "This is something special", when in fact it is cheap sentimentality. Which, I'm sorry, it kinda reads like.

No. Not every story with blind brothers are cheap sentimentality, but every story which relies solely on the brother being blind, and the sister being kind and understanding, instead of building actual characters out of those things, and making them interesting, is cheap sentimentality. I mean, for it to be truly touching other than just pathetic (which doesn't mean what you think it means, but actually "inspires empathy"), the blind brother has to be more than just blind, he has to be an actual person, with other qualities, with things he likes, with things he doesn't like. You can't make the blindness the character. Does that make sense? I mean, look:

“You’re standing at the edge of a cliff, your toes curled over the cold stone ledge. The wind plays in your hair and you can smell. . .lilacs. You step off the cliff and there’s a tiny moment where you’re floating. And then you fall. Falling, falling, forever. But even as you fall, you can still smell those lilacs.”

Nobody talks like that. And I doubt a blind man would use those words to describe what he feels. It's as if it is rehearsed. And if it is rehearsed then isn't authentic. And if it isn't authentic, then it doesn't sound true. And if it doesn't sound true, then we lose interest in the character, or worse, we never build any. Look, it's short. And maybe I'm asking for too much, you know? I mean, it's just a short story, you have limited space. But... I suggest you expand this, flesh out the characters more. Make your dialogue less intentionally sweet (CS), and more true (GW).

And I may be alone on this, but the chocolate, and the umbrella thing for the stars, that is just cheesy, and untrue. Like, chocolate doesn't taste like sunshine. And the stars don't feel like rain. You can say to me, use your imagination, but stars lighting up the sky, infinite, never ending, all alike, can't be described by anoyingly thick raindrops hitting the palm of my hand.

Oh, and I forgot. The best thing in your story is how the blind boy is thinking about how the sister is slowly growing up and spending less time with him. That is sad, and touching, without you shoving it up on our face. You mention the fact that time is running, and then you stop. With the other things is like you're screaming out: READ THIS AND CRY.
there are many problems in our times
but none of them are mine




User avatar
Gender Female
Points 890
Reviews 45
This was completely lovely and interesting. Bittersweet in a way, but still a great peice. Very well written, I must say. Nice work! Only one thing I noticed:

"He was smiling, running his fingers lightly over the textured skin of the creature, as if, just maybe, be could see it."

He, not "be".
That's it! I thoroughly enjoyed this.
RG :D



It always seems impossible until it's done.
— Nelson Mandela