b]
Prologue[/b]
Reader, can I ask you what a crime is to you? Is it the rape of an innocent little girl who put herself out on the street in the first place? Is it making a scam to receive money from the government? And, without said government, would there be no laws? We are told there are rules of nature: life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness.
If you've ever seen the cult movie Ed Wood's "Plan Nine From Outer Space", this seems to be like the opening there. "Greetings, my friend. We are all interested in the future, for that is where you and I are going to spend the rest of our lives. And remember my friend, future events such as these will affect you in the future....." Okay, yours is better than that, but you get the idea. The series of rhetoricals does nothing for me. Probably because it's human nature, it's difficult to make people care about the Terrible-Things-That-Happen-To-People-Who-Aren't-You, unless you force them to think about it. Gabriel Garcia Marquez's novels are worth reading soley for the opening lines. In the first paragraph, never be indefinite, stand your ground, ensnare attention in some way, by provoking your reader, or immersing them in something vivid. A convention of the crime genre is to start off with a scene that's some how disturbing but that you don't quite understand until later, it seemingly doesn't relate to the main part fo the story. Of course you don't have to keep to convention but it's there to use or subvert.
Crime:
1. An action or an instance of negligence that is deemed injurious to the public welfare or morals or to the interests of the state and that is legally prohibited.
2. Any offense, serious wrongdoing, or sin.
3. a foolish, senseless, or shameful act
What does this tell us? What is the purpose of this definition? I see the seeds of your idea here, and I believe in the power of wordplay. Margaret Atwood uses it constantly to reflect upon the values of a society, and most of the best poets do also. Rather that going directly to definitions, you could explore the etymology of the word.
'Crime: c.1250, from O.Fr. crimne, from L. crimen (gen. criminis) "charge, indictment, offense," from cernere "to decide, to sift" (see crisis). But Klein rejects this and suggests *cri-men, which would originally have been "cry of distress." The L. word is glossed in O.E. by facen, also "deceit, fraud, treachery."'
http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?sea ... hmode=none
Criminal is an adjective and a noun. So at what point does an adjective become a noun? At what point does what you do and how it is judge supercede every other aspect of you? Crime cannot be a verb, you have to 'commit' it, similar to 'commiting adultary', both suggeting a stage of temptation.
Chapter One
“Don’t worry; I bought it under the name Alfred Douglas. They won’t know it’s me and they won’t be able to find us. They don’t even know I’m married.” I shut the car engine off and pulled the keys from the ignition.
That he's reassuring her only as they arrive suggests a few things to me. Either Fleur is kind of fragile, she was shocked for the journey, and only now is she becoming upset about it, and he's being fatherly to her, which is why he adopts such a definite tone, with the repetition of 'won't', or she's been nagging him the whole time and he says 'won't', because he's gotten defensive. I couldn't quite decide through this which it was, especially when she says that he knows she doesn't like strangers, that could either be angry, hurt that he's defying her, or betrayed because he's supposed to always protect her. Is it one or the other, or a combination of the two?
never, under any occasion, Spanish.
A forbidden language.. curiouser and curiouser says Alice. I am intrigued
Fleur was a mix of sick genetics. She looked Irish (red hair, blue eyes, freckles), spoke French from birth, and her parents were American. She grew up in England (not learning English until she was seventeen) then moved to France. Not a year later, she met me.
I love the phrase 'sick genetics'. But the rest of this exposition has something a little laboured about it. You are a mistressful writer, and you don't actually need to tell us this if it doesn't come naturally.
Once inside, I persuaded her to think that the only reason I yelled was because of the stress I was under. It makes me laugh; I am a terrible liar, yet no matter how foolish the things I say are she will believe me to the end.
I like that you don't include the conversation, you just have him alluding to it. It fits, it grounds it too, robs it of melodrama and also gives insight into the two characters. V good. I like the tone you have, you can sort of feel the cogs of translation of it, if that makes any sense, but not in a stereotypical way which is very hard to achieve. V clever.
Those were bought under the name Alfred Douglas as well, but Fleur would be the one answering the door. She had a fear of strangers, so I didn’t let her in on this small detail. If I could answer the door for her, I would, but I cannot risk being seen.
I like the sparseness of this, you don't get bogged down in detail, you tell us exactly what we need to know, no more. V enticing.
“Mon Dieu! You should see the stain on this wall!”
“Is it glowing?”
“What? No, but it’s huge. It looks like someone vomited on the wall and just left it there for a few days.” Her voice sounded far away and it made the house feel hollower than I knew it was.
“Then I don’t care.”
Sparkling shiney dialogue. I laugh.
Argh, I shall continue this critique later, as I have so many stories to get to, but I am addicted to this story, I like your tone and style, you've really got something. Dying to know what happens.
Love and babies,
Kit.
