-
Re: Nuclear weapons
You know what. I'm not gonna bother with it since as Incandy said, we don't see eye to eye on the matter. I'ma back down from it.
Jan 31, 2008 -
Re: Nuclear weapons
Incandy, do you know nothing of risks in a given situation? Do I have to play out the standard hunter versus fugitive one? You were to assume the role of ...
Jan 30, 2008 -
Re: Nuclear weapons
It has none and many sources cite this, and the fact nuclear strategy alone is unlike conventional military strategy. Seriously, your own cited sources have disproved you time and time ...
Jan 30, 2008 -
Re: Nuclear weapons
Incandy you have again latched on to nothing of actuality and this red herring (you are using it wrong) STILL proves your inept and blatent ignorance. At 1944 so-called nuclear ...
Jan 29, 2008 -
Re: Nuclear weapons
Directed at Incandy Since you seem to not read my posts I'll give you a brief post, hopefully your attention will last through it: You misinterpret and bend words when ...
Jan 29, 2008 -
Re: Nuclear weapons
You two both fail to realize the weight and the purpose of nuclear weapons still. ---- To Incand: May's work was that of policy, something of which should only be ...
Jan 28, 2008 -
Re: Nuclear weapons
Usually civilians are not made aware of a nuclear threat, this is always kept hushed by the government, even with the Cuban Crisis most people don't know how close we ...
Jan 27, 2008 -
Re: Nuclear weapons
R.J. Hoffman you have proved to be unable to comprehend the use of nukes, even with the numbers in your face. Nukes are the cheapest and most effective weapons to ...
Jan 27, 2008 -
Re: Nuclear weapons
scotty that is my point, they are a waste of tax payers dollars because they cannot be used realistically. even if there was cause our allies would get affects of ...
Jan 24, 2008
