-
Re: The Quoting Game
Quote this. Because I'm goody-two-shoes. You get a dime. Prok gets no dime. This is my third attempt. Please, no one beat me to the punch this time. EDIT: Yay!
Jun 5, 2008 -
Re: YWS Now Has Officespace!
You messed up the copy/paste of the logo. It needs to be down a little. ;)
Jun 5, 2008 -
Re: Chinese Occupation of Tibet
thunder_dude, as Vernon pointed out, China is one of the world's potential superpowers. You can't just threaten them with a nuke. This isn't Iran or Iraq or some other weak ...
Jun 5, 2008 -
Re: Should we take the troops out of Iraq?
thunder_dude7: two points: 1) It's illogical to assume that just because withdrawal from Iraq will play out exactly the same as the withdrawal from Vietnam. They're two different situations. 2) ...
Jun 5, 2008 -
Re: Is four really equal to two plus two?
Is it weird that I actually found that interesting?
Jun 3, 2008 -
Re: All Users Will Need 2 Pass A Grammar Test
Nate is like the boy who cried wolf, only more creative.
Jun 3, 2008 -
Re: Major Evolution Flaw
It seems that evolutionists know everything about the missing link except for the fact that they are missing. Scientists have found loads of transitional forms. Ape men, whales with legs, ...
Jun 3, 2008 -
Re: Major Evolution Flaw
However, what does he mean by this? It sounds like he's saying that science's understanding his incomplete, therefore admitting that his own theories are flawed, which was what I pointed ...
Jun 2, 2008 -
Re: Major Evolution Flaw
Kylan: 1) The eye quote is what's known as a 'quote mine'. It was taken out of its context to make it appear as though Darwin is saying something that ...
Jun 2, 2008 -
Re: Major Evolution Flaw
1) The eye quote is what's known as a 'quote mine'. It was taken out of its context to make it appear as though Darwin is saying something that he ...
Jun 2, 2008 -
Re: All Users Will Need 2 Pass A Grammar Test
But ... I has excellent grammar!
Jun 1, 2008 -
Re: Women's pants
The obvious solution here is that women should not wear any clothes at all. Then everyone would be happy.
May 30, 2008 -
Re: 'Earth's resources are there to be used, not conserved'
On what reasoning do base that assertion on, khfan? After all, you have to account for the negatives that using the resources will bring about. For example, using fossil fuels ...
May 29, 2008 -
Re: 'Earth's resources are there to be used, not conserved'
They're not there to be used or conserved. They're just there. What we do with them - if anything - is a decision we have to consider, and carefully.
May 29, 2008 -
Re: Women's pants
It all sounds good to me.
May 28, 2008
