User avatar

PiesAreSquared

PiesAreSquared: Area's Formula

  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Opinions on Controversial Topics

    Karzkin, I don’t want to get into a debate with you. However, you should consider this. I can’t find where she originally posted this, but this should do, maybe even ...

    Mar 7, 2012
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Opinions on Controversial Topics

    ZLYF, so how about this: All you seem to do is constantly try to insult me, lately by claiming me not to be a philosopher at all, and you simply ...

    Mar 6, 2012
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Opinions on Controversial Topics

    Evidence I gave. Diamond’s half life. More evidence: Mt. Saint Helen, The incredible design in nature. Dawkins once said, “We live in a world that appeared designed, but is not.” ...

    Mar 6, 2012
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Opinions on Controversial Topics

    Yeah, I get what you mean. My bad :P

    Mar 6, 2012
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Opinions on Controversial Topics

    Thanks, Karzkin, but I think the term anti-theist or misotheist applies better in his case!

    Mar 6, 2012
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Opinions on Controversial Topics

    should I expect orange eyed humans from your lab? :D Yellow? Clawed horses? LOL

    Mar 6, 2012
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Opinions on Controversial Topics

    He is an expert at zoology! You should read his work about bees -- it's fascinating! Yup. ZLYF: That's not the official stance of the Church. That's philosophy concerning the ...

    Mar 6, 2012
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Opinions on Controversial Topics

    Richard Dawkins is not agnostic, is not atheistic, he’s anti-theistic. So are those who positively hate God. And Richard Dawkins is hardly a dimwit. He’s one of the most brilliant ...

    Mar 6, 2012
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Opinions on Controversial Topics

    I will argue that we do not have explicit evidence to disprove the existence of God/gods/some higher power (if I start another argument, I’m SOOOO sorry!). We do, however, have ...

    Mar 6, 2012
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Opinions on Controversial Topics

    Hey, Snoink, was not meaning to troll at all!!! I was not sure of the correct word to use. Papal Bull? I really don’t know :P Haha. Okay, I get ...

    Mar 6, 2012
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Opinions on Controversial Topics

    BadlyDrawnLightning, First of all- when has Creationism ever been a minority. Do you know how large the percentage of Christians in America is- 76%. And do you know how many ...

    Mar 6, 2012
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Opinions on Controversial Topics

    I could not respond, because I wrote it in the evening and had 7 hours of school today. Peace. That is perfectly acceptable! However, have you imagined going to school ...

    Mar 5, 2012
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Is fate only chance?

    This, my man, is foolish. This field is mainly philosophy, and why the hell would you want me to cite some other philosophers to support my own answer? Don't I ...

    Mar 5, 2012
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Is fate only chance?

    “WHAT would you rather believe in, God or the multiverse? It sounds like an instance of cosmic apples and oranges, but increasingly we are being told it’s a choice we ...

    Mar 5, 2012
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Is fate only chance?

    Anyway, I am more interested to reply to the name of this thread. Chance... Is it even proven to exist? Nothing is random in our universe. everything is caused by ...

    Mar 5, 2012


My spelling is wobbly. It's good spelling, but it wobbles, and the letters get in the wrong places.
— A.A. Milne