NovaRose

Which has nothing to do with anything. And the God of the Old Testament was Jesus. When Adam and Eve were sent out of the Garden of Eden, they were ...

I never said agnosticism was wussy. I've just observed that several agnostics I know seem to choose it because they don't want to follow any rules. And yes, I try ...

Neither communism nor capitalism are the best. Communism doesn't work because most people believe in living for themselves, and capitalism doesn't always work because people can take advantage of it ...

You could have checked the Bible before you said that. Look up Exodus 33:11 "11 And the LORD aspake unto Moses bface to face, as a man speaketh unto his friend. ...

Yeah, I tend to be vague too lol. And I agree; one case could just mean that the one person happened to be extra healthy. Who knows? Maybe without smoking ...

That's why we have a prophet today who has direct revelation from God. Also, that's why the Book of Mormon came about, being an inspired document just like the Bible ...

Whether it's presented as fact or not, millions of kids all over are taking it as such without any thought. I think that gives an unfair bias against religion myself. ...

Heh, that could bring up some ATM safety issues, eh?

Thanks for being so vague, BS :roll: I think he is asking you to give him some proof of it. And frankly, I'm skeptical that cigarettes are good at that ...

There's some sort of infinite beginning that no one can understand. The answer is that God was created by his own God, just as we may one day create humans ...

That is the stupidest thing I've ever seen. Those people really need to get a life.

Hey, when it says that God made Adam out of the dust, what does that really mean? Couldn't it mean that he took an existing organism and changed it to ...

I think incest is wrong too. I'm just saying that God would have done something in the beginning so that it wasn't really incest. And that's when the topic took ...

Of course it's not reliable source. That's why I don't have an opinion on it. Also, science is, in a way, religion. You can't prove what chances there are that ...

Well, when you answer your own question, it usually is rhetorical.