Critique Sammiches

3 posts
User avatar
Gender Male
Points 7650
Reviews 147
The Critique Sandwich is a great idea. But there are other reviewing techniques, I'm sure. I'm also sure this topic has been done before, but... ah well.

So, what's your personal technique? And what do you expect from a review?




User avatar
Gender Male
Points 17581
Reviews 126
TheNewHero wrote:The Critique Sandwich is a great idea. But there are other reviewing techniques, I'm sure. I'm also sure this topic has been done before, but... ah well.

So, what's your personal technique? And what do you expect from a review?

I don't review in the traditional sense. What I prefer to do is just 'comment' on the piece and say what they did well or not well and why avoiding grammar discussion and layout for the most part. Thus my reviews are generally shorter and more encouraging/informative in the form of opinion.
"If the king doesn't lead, how can he expect his subordinates to follow?"




User avatar
Gender Male
Points 8517
Reviews 147
I use a Critique Spread. That is, I point out nitpicks and inconsistencies first, then afterwards I talk over positive points. I only use a Critique Sandwich if the story is too good for it to have a great many nitpicks.
"A superman ... is, on account of certain superior qualities inherent in him, exempted from the ordinary laws which govern men. He is not liable for anything he may do."
Nathan Leopold



Some people are hourglass shaped, some people are apple shaped, some people are pear shaped, some people are even bean pole shaped, but if we’re not careful we all become banana shaped. This is your gentle posture reminder.
— Ranger