Warning: This work has been rated 16+ for language.
This will probably take place two chapters after the previous chapter, after an interim chapter featuring other characters. But, given that this is the group of characters actual real-life people have already been introduced to now, I decided to write this first. Despite my claims of hastiness in the work description, it is apparently twice as long as the previous chapter and definitely took me a little more time. But I’m glad the creative juices are flowing again for things like this one way or another, at least.
Comments and clarifying questions are welcome beyond just constructive criticism for this piece, I’m aware it’s a slightly dense and possibly abstruse read in more than one place.
—————
Chapter 15: To Life
“Keira?”
She began to return to the present moment, back from the barely extant memory.
Somebody was saying “As long as it’s not another stupid jo—“
“Shut up,” the talkative middle-aged man snapped. “Keira!?”
“I’m fine,” she managed to say, albeit with an obvious tinge of fogginess present in her voice. “All good.”
“Should we ask the Thinker what to do?”
“The thinker?”
“Yeah, the Thinker. It’s just what we were calling it before, me and a couple others. You know, since the hypothesis would be that it could actually—“
“Right, I get it. Maybe that settles it then.”
“The headline?”
Keira tried to suppress a smirk but a trace of it appeared, and it was enough for almost the entire team to begin loudly groaning. “Yeah, I think I have a headline. Oh, hush.”
For Immediate Dispersion: The Thinker Comes To Life
April 4th, 2034 - K. Cross, A. Feinstein, N. Chao, et al.
On an unassuming chilly afternoon early this month, our dedicated team of a baker’s dozen plus myself finally perfected an invention that has been in the works for decades.
Not since Turing first struck the ink ribbon with his thoughts as air raid sirens wailed has such a revolution in modern computing occurred. Babbage and Lovelace would doubtless weep at our feet.
The title you have read is more or less accurate, in the colloquial sense at least—we have really created a thinking machine.
How does it handle the halting problem, you may ask? Like any human might, it grows weary of the pointlessness. No matter how you frame it. And no, it’s not some large language modeling garbage. This time we have real neural synthesis to offer you.
I can sense your doubt. But no worries, a trial portal will be available shortly. Use it responsibly when it debuts, and know this is just the beginning.
We welcome constructive feedback of all kinds.
Sincerely,
Keira Cross and her Perfluous People
“It’s not the piece you’ve written that screams ‘try hard’ the loudest, I will grant you.”
“Should we send it through the machine?”
“Haha. And you mean the Thinker.”
“Actually,” said a woman interrupting Keira and Adam, which was the name of the 41-year-old with a healthy disrespect for young’uns that Keira had been trading banter with just before she had spaced out. “Why not? What’s to be lost? It’s an airgapped network, and we can always just send the original through instead.”
“That’s a good point,” Adam said.
“Not interested,” Keira immediately said. “For all we know this thing has a recognizable and fairly immutable personality like the old LLMs. If it gets out someday that I ran the bulletin by the thing itself it’s a huge conflict of interest.”
“Or…” Adam said, and she willed him to hold his tongue rather than say whatever stupid thing he was about to say. “Just a great hook.”
“A hook? Something we keep a secret is a hook?”
“You’re the one who brought up secrets.”
Keira looked around the room, realizing that the others were silent only because she was already outnumbered by those two. As team lead she had a degree of superiority, but her vote only counted for one and a half points to everyone else’s singular point. And clearly, a role as tiebreaker was not going to be very relevant today.
“Alright,” she sighed. “I’ll run it through. But in the event that what it gives back isn’t as good, I’m not running with it just because the computer said it.”
“Fine,” Adam said. “But let’s at least give it a shot.”
“Well, that requires getting this text onto the system,” she said, but Adam was already passing her a storage chip.
She gave a final sigh of reluctance, and took it from him. Plugging it into her laplet, she dragged the .pdf to the chip’s icon onscreen and then took the actual chip over to the so-called Thinker.
“Here goes nothing,” she said.
“Or everything,” came a muffled whisper from a voice she couldn’t identify somewhere from within the thirteen others present.
She took one more deep breath, then plugged it in. The Thinker lit up an LED in recognition of the chip, then began to display.
Unfortunately, this is an unrecognized format.
“…Seriously?” one of the more recent hires said, then thought better of it after receiving several looks.
“We were focused on processing a million human minds, sorry we forgot to ensure total format compatibility,” Keira said, now in a rare mood. “This is my file to begin with, why should you even care when you’re not the one who has to paste the text into a ‘dot-TXT’ now?”
Nobody said a thing in response. Continuing that silence, which was suddenly refreshing to her, she did the necessary work and returned to the Thinker; now with the chip containing a mostly equivalent .txt file instead of the offending .pdf.
As she plugged it into the relevant slot she realized the text encoding might still be incompatible with the Thinker’s current base software that handles and deciphers the magical time crystal neuron bullshit, and she said a small prayer to a deity she had never had and would never have a shred of faith in.
But the Thinker was thankfully agreeable regardless this second time, and the display began to light up with more text than ever before.
This is a fine piece for a tongue-in-cheek publication parodying great scientific journals, or a release from a team known for not taking themselves very seriously. The overall language and tone is suitable for a press release document about a groundbreaking discovery from a group of researchers, but the particular words used make the piece clearly humorous to some extent. Is this tone desired? Assistance is available regarding subtly reducing the humor while preserving the core message entirely. One additional thing before it’s your turn for the prompt again. Is this conversation occurring with Keira Cross or Adam Feinstein as the participant, by any chance?
Everyone peered over her shoulder to see what it said despite the words being projected on a large mounted screen in the corner of the room as well, like how a devoted fan might move further towards the front to be closer to their favorite singer at a concert even if it meant they couldn’t see the monitor for the people further back anymore. A monitor which would provide a much better view, but more emotional distance.
Whether they realized it or not, the researchers already had a craving for closeness with this thing. At least, most of them.
Keira sat turning these words over in her head, aware that nobody would dare speak at this point before she did.
“Well—“ she said, and paused to gather her thoughts a brief moment, but the silence was now broken to an acceptable degree for at least a few teammates. Including Adam.
“Looks like it thinks you’re too frivolous. This feels like a familiar critique. Hm, where might I have heard it before?” Adam said, enjoying the upper ground he had now claimed in the discussion.
“Okay, okay,” Keira said with obvious exasperation. “It’s able to identify what you clowns would all think of it. But does that mean my bulletin is unprofessional? Or just staying true to a stylistic voice that this team has established in all previous press releases?”
“That you have established,” said Garrett, the new hire that had quickly shut his mouth earlier. “Not us.”
“Yep,” concurred Adam, and others nodded along.
“Why don’t you at least see what it has to offer?” Garrett asked. “Maybe you’ll like it more than you expect.”
“We don’t do clinically sterilized press releases,” she said.
“So just tell the thing not to make it clinical!” Adam said loudly.
“No, it would be good for it to be clinical. Just not—“
“Quit delaying and just ask it for the revision, Keira,” Adam said, staring at her with a sudden sternness that discomfited her.
“Alright, fuck it,” she said, trying to find some zen within her. Or a happy place. Her inner temple. Whatever the fuck the New Age flockers and yearnies (at present time shouting furiously but inaudibly from twenty-three stories below them) thought was the best term for inner peace.
This is Keira Cross speaking, correct. Sure, let’s see what you have to say. Please don’t make it any more formal than it already is, though, and try not to alter the tone noticeably from the previous Perfluous releases you have access to in the process.
For some reason there was no delay this time. The response came back instantaneously, disconcertingly so.
Hello, Keira. First, clarification that there was no educated guess, but just simply checking the two credits first listed on the paper without any hope of a certain answer being correct over another. The request is understood, but it is a more difficult one than you may anticipate.
First and foremost, there is the issue of your choice of writing style when contrasted with the goals you have provided, or that have been suggested and you have chosen at the very least. They are on the surface contradictory goals. Would you like me to suggest some ways of ameliorating this while perhaps meeting a modified form of your goals?
“Okay, it’s time to unplug this thing,” she said, and somebody actually gasped before realizing she wasn’t serious. “I’m being facetious, but come on. It needs fine-tuning.”
“I think it’s going fine and you just don’t want to hear what your very own enfant terrible has to say,” Adam said, with an inexplicably rueful smile accompanying the words.
Keira considered the contradiction of the emotion on his face and what he was saying, and decided she had had enough.
“Look, we’re just putting the piece out as is. Otherwise I’m actually unplugging it for the day.”
“And we would dutifully stop you in accordance with the regulations.”
“You would try,” she said, summoning up every bit of intimidation her five foot six frame could manage to muster.
Adam looked at her, clearly not impressed, but then his face softened. She thought again of the contradictory smile he had shown.
“Alright, fine,” Adam said, with his voice suddenly smooth and absent hesitation. “I’m down. If that’s how you want the world’s most significant invention to be announced, I suppose it’ll hardly matter once people start experiencing the tech for themselves.”
“Exactly,” she said. The rest of the team silently declined comment, one after another, in a predefined order.
“Then let’s do it,” Adam said, with a tone that felt reassuring all of a sudden.
She considered for a moment if she was just being overly stubborn, and if the Thinker (if she could manage to stop gagging every time she called it that) would really come up with a better article if given a chance. Were her daddy issues clouding her judgment?
Regardless, it seemed that the moment was now upon them, whether or not she spoke up about her newfound willingness to try the thing.
In a hushed and reverent silence, the fourteen researchers moved nearly as one after Keira submitted the piece through the portal. They moved to the window, pulling the blinds open, and looked far far down.
After thirty or so seconds, the specks of people below seemed to move in response to some signal, obviously checking their phones.
A moment of stupor, and then the specks grew more chaotic than ever.
“Doesn’t look like they’re happy,” Adam said with a hint of glee.
“Yeah,” Keira said, trying her best to sound present and in the moment.
But she was getting lost in nostalgia again.
Next chapter: https://www.youngwriterssociety.com/work/Aet%20Lindling/Syboleth-ch-16-Valerie-2032-162031
Points:
Time spent:
Canary word: Present
Possible AI signals:
Original Text:
Are you sure you want to delete this comment? This cannot be undone.
Mark this comment as a review? Points will be awarded to the poster.
Your comment was posted, but it wasn’t long enough to count as a review. Reviews need about four complete sentences (at least 250 characters). Try writing another review that explains your thoughts in more detail — the author will appreciate it, and you’ll earn points for it.
Ya know that it’s the AN itself that makes me not want to read this every time I open this chapter?
Alright, dialogue formatting. You need a comma after saying, since you need to connect the speech to the rest of the sentence somehow.I just… I really hate it when authors throw stuff out there like “I know this is terrible and I’ll fix it *eventually*” because… why post it if you know what’s wrong with it? Who is rushing you? Why not fix it before making it available to everyone else?
I understand if you yourself don’t know what’s wrong and are looking for feedback. That is fine, this is what reviews are for. But to say “yeah I know what’s wrong, read it anyway” is just… callous.
I also understand being in a creative flow =D
Ok so let’s read this.
I would have liked a reminder on where exactly these characters are. This is a new chapter so you kinda have to set the scene again, maybe show where everyone is in relation to everyone else etc
You also might want to break this overloaded sentence up: Just… stick to one information in the sentence?
Kinda feels like the machine already knew she would ask this and prepared beforehand? “For some reason there was no delay this time.“ O.O I like it!
I also like how the machine speaks. It gives the vibe of LLMs but at the same time feels a bit less…. Subservient.
Ok where does THIS come from? O___O This feels very inappropriate: “Were her daddy issues clouding her judgment?“
Thank you so much! I am sorry (ironically), I feel the need to apologize far too often. It is a plague.
I tried to keep it shorter with the third chapter, aside from noting that I added something later because the entire thing was really short. However, now that you mention it I%u2019ll take out an unnecessary apologetics display from the third author%u2019s note.
Anyway, moving on, I completely agree with most of your critiques! That stuff should be changed.
However, her daddy issues absolutely connect quite closely with the Thinker. If you reread the first chapter, and especially if you check out the third chapter, you should get some clues as to why. She%u2019s a complicated gal.
Thank you so much for your thoughts! I%u2019m really excited to take this story places, and especially to introduce some less manic-pixie-dream-girl MCs because I promise they aren%u2019t all like Keira ahahah.
I meant more that there is no context for the comment in THIS chapter. I don't see it and if you love the line so much you do have to lay more groundwork here to make it make sense.
Oh, I get you! It%u2019s kind of a mixture of foreshadowing and just the fact that we are peering inside her raw thoughts.
Think A Song of Ice and Fire. I foolishly thought I was more inspired by Adams and Gibson but I%u2019m starting to realize I%u2019m just writing GRRM-style speculative sci-fi.
You%u2019ll be very pleased when you get to the third chapter and see what I did with the AN.
I'm baaaaack! After reading your PM, I'm glad I have a little more context (especially now that I can agree Pet Sounds is better than Sgt. Pepper
)
This chapter continues to demonstrate something about your writing that I feel is unique: a strong command of voice. It feels lived-in, fractious, and specific, with each speaker occupying a recognizable social role within the group. Keira has a very certain feel to her personality, as well, even if it may be a little "pretentious" purposefully. There's a lot of nuance to that, and she inhabits a specific role where it's allowed in society, but I think it works well with the overall ironic tone I've picked up.
Like in these sentences:
I really love how this part expands upon something that the previous was oversaturated with. It's dense, somewhat jargon-y, but it's certainly more human -- as ironic as that is -- than how the preceding part had been attempting to do everything at once with exposition.
That said, you're right about pacing. For example:
The central conflict, whether to run the bulletin through the Thinker and how to respond to its critique, unfolds over too many conversational loops. "Let's ask the Thinker." "Actually, now I'm too scared to ask the Thinker." "Weeeeelllll... I really want to ask the Thinker." Let it go, Keira! Just do it!
Several of these exchanges reiterate the same positions with minimal escalation, so I didn't find them to feel important on the level they are. It's some kind of commentary on tech culture to ask your own AI creation to critique something created from your humanity. The scene in question would benefit from snipping some of those reiterations. Right now, I feel like it exhausts the only real forward plotline that can have besides the speculative slice-of-life that's been building.
He's so straightforward!
This brings me to my next point, though: I also wonder Adam's purpose? He seems closer to becoming a functional antagonist rather than a fully dimensional character. He oscillates between needling, challenging, and soothing Keira, but it happens so rapidly that it feels more like narrative convenience. Is he supposed to be like that? Is his motivation ambition, insecurity, ideological conviction, or just the fact he can't stand that Keira is doing something impressive?
Big things coming! I'm excited to see what happens as the Thinker progresses and becomes more of a force in Keira's life.
Great work once again!
- pixels
I'm glad you agree on that very important plot point! I also greatly appreciate the ego-plumping of the first few paragraphs.
As for the rest, I am pleased to say that I have yet again already addressed most of your concerns in stuff you haven't seen yet. Adam and Keira's mutually respectful but playfully combative professional relationship is a bit complicated to describe without showcasing it, but whether or not it becomes personal later on down the line isn't even something I quite have figured out yet anyway. Either way, the other 13 are theoretically equals but he's the de facto second-in-command, and eventually takes on a sort of mentor role. Currently, he is of the mind that challenging Keira will make her grow up a bit faster and be better suited for the role she%u2019s in.
Or in other words, I'm afraid to report that all four motivation guesses you went through are wholly incorrect, but every facial expression detailed had meaning.
Plus, his birthday is coming up. :3
Anyway, as far as the central conflict, I definitely get what you're saying but upon looking at it carefully I'm not sure what to snip. I'm probably too close to it, but it all feels like it's serving a role. Part of the issue may be that I was probably intentionally making the conflict drag a little so that it would be a relief when Adam cuts it off. In addition, there are some things that crop up in the middle of the conflict that might feel like part of it but are more like an intermission.
What you're saying is that the story might be better served by splitting up some of the concepts discussed across different scenes, I think? Which would be great if I could think of a way to do it, but here's how I see it in my head, beat by beat:
The thing is written by Keira, she shows it.
They suggest running it thru.
Immediate decline, deception justification.
Adam points out no need for secrets, so she agrees when realizing she's outnumbered.
[Then some irrelevant interplay while they figure out the Thinker]
Adam celebrates that the Thinker agrees, and Keira points out that they are already known for this style, but Garrett pounces on her imprecise verbiage as they begin to gang up on her for taking so long.
She explains she doesn't want sterile unpersonable writing, but it hardly matters to them and she is commanded to just do it, which she then does.
Upon feeling insulted or at least embarrassed by the Thinker, her defenses rise again.
Then, to be honest, I just do some worldbuilding and subtly introduce the hierarchy of response and regulations that physically if need be prevent certain actions even by the team lead and such things, before we finally get to the belabored point.
Also, given future developments, there will be at least two opportunities to pretty much revisit the conflict in a totally new light. But let me know what specifically you feel I could trim. As is I look at it and feel like it's a perfectly interlocking puzzle that I would have to repaint to assemble differently. Aside from the smudge on one puzzle piece in regards to the immediate release to general academia.
Thank you again for the incredible review! You might have to become an advance reader at some point%u2026 more than I've already made you into, anyway %uD83E%uDD2A