Published February 13, 2012
(nothing)
Points:
Time spent:
IP address:
Canary word: Present
Possible AI signals:
Original Text:
Are you sure you want to delete this comment? This cannot be undone.
Mark this comment as a review? Points will be awarded to the poster.
Your comment was posted, but it wasn’t long enough to count as a review. Reviews need about four complete sentences (at least 250 characters). Try writing another review that explains your thoughts in more detail — the author will appreciate it, and you’ll earn points for it.
This is an interesting piece. I am not acquainted with your tone, so excuse me if I say something stupid that goes against your style. Structurally, I think you could do a lot with this concept. The way I see it, there is the old man's story in the first half, the husband's in the second. My gut reaction at first was that there was too much after the reveal, in the conventional narrative building to a climax idea. It does peter out after the reveal, but then, you don't want to overshadow that, you are looking to show the whole lives of the couple, and of course life peters out for most of us. I think symmetry is important in this piece with a title like that.
There are a lot of sophisticated things in this work, but I think the phrasing in the opening lines is letting you down. In some cases well chosen verb can do the work of ten adjectives, and sometimes adverbs actually take away some of the impact of the phrase. "glazed across" seems somehow cumbersome to me. "smoothly and fast", "harder and stronger", and "moved with increasing difficulty" are kind of ineffectual, strong verbs, preferably with an onomatopoeic edge them (surged, chuffed, hurtled, etc etc, you can think of better ones),might make for a bolder opening.
"Snow glazed the window as the train sped towards Tahoe through the pine forests of the Sierra Nevada Mountains."
Would be how I'd edit it, but there are about a million different ways of doing it, so whatever feels right. Sometimes it helps doing the writing it in half the number of words, then double, then the number your started with trick, if nothing else it clarifies what the essential and climactic parts of the sentense are.
Intentionally double glazed? If so, make more of a thing of it.
This is very deliberate. You are being very nice to us, which makes me think that when you were at school you had an English class that did not understand your stuff. If you want to be more mean and/or sneaky, you can hide these clues more. I like the slits though (that's what he said).
Likewise, this could be "His voice was not consoling. It was stiff, matter of fact, and did not invite further conversation." (That's what she said)
I like the dialogue there is something surreal or absurd about it. Makes your brain tingle.
Dry emotion is a really lovely way of putting it. Well done, very subtle.
Unruly run on sentence. Perspiration is a nice touch though.
Stylistically this is strong. I can't help hearing it in like a children's book voice in my head.'Poohbear thought how much nicer it would be if there were more honey, indeed if there were even more honey and even more of marijuana his dealer had hidden in the jar. Those Bananas in Pyjamas sure were right about those munchie honey cakes.'
Pretty
When I was in primary school, I wrote a description of a storm, and it started with "The storm grumbled on.". My teachers laughed at me, 'Storms can't grumble' they said, and scribbled it out, changing it to 'The storm continued on". I hate the word continued because it doesn't do or say anything, it just is. But obviously, I would be biased from that childhood trauma, being deprived of personification. Which do you think is better, 'grumbled' or 'continued'?
This feels real, it's exactly the kind of conversation you have with someone on a train.
The husband section I don't like quite as much, maybe because all the cards are on the table, maybe because it isn't as layered as the first section. It is still strong, just beside the first half, it pales by comparison. The flashbacks are very deliberate and opaque, it might be interesting to weave them into the physical moment a bit tighter, it might help keep the two reacting off one another, he has this whole journey in his head, she is kind of left behind, and to me that doesn't quite feel organic. We're arguing, you're crying, but I'm just going to pause that and go have two of the biggest paragraphs being introspective over here. It's good stuff, nice details, but where it is, it's anti climactic. You could put it prior to him saying he wants out to raise the stakes when he does say it.
I think you would like "Encyclopaedia of Snow" by Sarah Emily Miano, and I am not saying that because there is snow in both, her tone in the longer sections has a crushing poignancy that doesn't slip into the contrived and melodramatic, you may find an affinity there.
Anyway. Gorgeous. Keep up the good work.
Is getting used to this new system. So confusing.
Okay, overall a very interesting story. The writing is very detailed and everything is described to a point that I can actually see it. Sometimes the constant descriptions comes off a little tell like and does not fit with the narrative.
The beginning is little heavy. In general I found the piece to be a bit dense in content. It’s lot of well thought out information, but maybe too much in a short period of time. The fact that nobody is given names makes it a little repetitive. I recall ‘the husband being used in back to back sentences. The piece has very nice end focus. The last few lines have a nice resonance.
The very first lines also are pretty good at hooking. The overall content is interesting, but the delivery from point A to point B is like I said a bit dense. I would suggest going through it and trimming it up a bit. Some descriptions, actions and dialogue seem out of place and unneeded. Subtly would cut down a bit the chunk. There seems to be a bit of telling rather than discovering things on our own. It’s a lot to take in on one sitting without subtler breaks.
Characters: Overall solid and well thought out. They are believe with interesting back stories, but at times their dialogue is a little unbelievable in the tell like nature of it. This could be one of the spots of trimming.
Plot: Overall a very solid idea and interesting, but like I said, it is a bit dense reading and can be trimmed down to better highlight the overall ideas.
Thanks for the advice. Great advice. I've been considering reducing the husband's long speaking role in the last third of the story and shortening it so to make his description of why he can't "stand it anymore" more vague leaving the reader to guess why instead of giving them the straight, exclusively said answer. What do you think?