Hello, lovely! Here as requested. I haven't read the other reviews, so I risk repeating what they've said. This is going to be LONG, so be warned.
I'm going to do a little bit of odd organization for this review—I'll review the whole thing for literary stuff at the beginning, then I'll do minor quibbles for the first few paragraphs. I'll probably go quote-by-quote in the quibble portions, and the grammatical criticism won't necessarily be complete or perfect. If you'd like me to give you the entirety of my quibbles and proofreading for this chapter, feel free to PM me and I'll make up a list for you, or if you have this in a pad (WFP, etc.), you could link me to it and I could suggest my corrections there.
To begin! Big quibble with your opening line which is more literary than quibble-worthy—I like it, but I don't like "ruined and abandoned". I think it would work just as well if not better without that, because it makes the reader curious to keep reading—also, since you explain the cars are dead in the next sentence, it makes the opening line feel a little over-explained. Your next statement is a fragment, and confusing—what does "dead and along with their owners" mean? (I assume you mean "dead, along with their owners", but I think there's a better way to put that so it's not so... well, explanatory.)
Is this your first foray into present tense? You seem to slip into past tense a lot, and it's very obvious when you do, because it's completely out of place with the rest of the story. You'll slip into past tense for a paragraph or so, and then back into present, then back into past... It's a little confusing and concerning.
I think this doesn't really work at the very beginning. You need a hook to draw your readers in, and while you seem to have that (I do like your first line), you don't expand on the initial interest of everything being broken and desolate, you just immediately jump into him walking to his campside and finding a journal and then reading it. Even if it is the first five paragraphs, that's going to be probably your first two pages, and a reader is not going to be very interested in reading past that if they're bored already.
I will be honest, this sounds like an interesting story, but it actually bored me half to death. I'm sitting here, writing this review, after trudging through 6k words of this, and trudging through the first 700-or-so in great detail to do the quibbles at the bottom. I think a lot of your writing slows it down and makes it very... uninteresting. A lot of that is probably stylistic, so I think once you have a better grasp on the grammar and punctuation laws, it'll brighten up a little.
I have a list of abolished words that I never ever ever want you to use in this, because they're faulty tools that don't give you proper credit as an author—it stands at "also", "too" "obvious" (especially as an adjective describing things such as "obvious beauty" or "obvious age"), "then" ("then I did this, then I did that, then she did this, then he did that"), and "very" ("he was very tired" vs. "he was exhausted"). Not a definitive list, but a start.
Overall, I think you could benefit from a proofreader (see my long, long list of quibbles below)—and I would actually be VERY glad to help you with proofreading this if you'd like, because I am interested, and I'd like to have something of an invested interest in this ongoing piece. I also think that you could benefit from reading a few pieces on "show, don't tell"—here's one to start with, but remember that nothing is the be-all end-all. Keep writing! (And keep reading to see the grammatical and stylistic errors that I think really ought to be fixed. This isn't me saying "your writing sucks"; this is me saying "hey, here's some stuff you can fix".)
QUIBBLES (for the first section)
This sentence seems a little odd and out of place—is it necessary where it is?He carries a medium sized brown backpack near filling with a hunting rifle slung over it.
I think this might be a better place to put the detail of the backpack. Also, because there are no extra details in your list, the items should be separated by commas, not semicolons (see: how to use a semicolon), and there's a lot of repetition in "grey hairs streak through his hair"; also, before "once", there should be a comma—suggested improvement?:Everything he carries looks worn: the backpack; his clothes; even himself. Grey hairs streak through his hair once a chestnut brown.
It keeps the details and fixes some of the more blatant grammatical errors.Everything he carries looks worn, from his clothes to his brown backpack, full to the brim with a hunting rifle slung over it, and even himself. Grey streaks through his hair where chestnut brown once was.
As he walks his keen, trained eyes scan the horizon.
There should be a comma after "As he walks"; it's a prepositional phrase at the beginning of a sentence, which means that it should be separated from the independent clause by a comma. This is a Rule.
I like the idea of the first sentence of this part (however, the word is "paid"), but I also think that it could be shown, rather than told, in a better way. Perhaps show him actually avoiding a tripwire that he sees strung between the lamp posts, and then maybe throw something in about someone else he watched activate one at some point. "He'd" should be "He's", because you're in present tense. I think there should be a comma after "tired", and the colon should be a comma or a dash. I think your description of the surrounding area is a little dry and lacking, and the word "also" should be abolished (also, also, also, says the reviewer—but it really shouldn't be used in prose description). I think that the "a small forest... small hill" section could be rewritten.Years of experience have taught him to use extreme caution where others had failed and payed. He'd seen what happens if you don't. He walks alone and tired but fixed on his destination: a small forest on the right side of the motorway up an also small hill.
Semicolon after "north" is inaccurate; it should be a dash or a period if you want a dramatic pause for the reader. The word "obvious" should be abolished as well. [Abolished words list: also, obvious.] Using the word "obvious" bypasses having to actually describe his age. It's a very shoddy corner-cutting tool, and those are almost never good in prose. I like your simile here.He leaps over the barrier with surprising agility despite his obvious age dividing the left side from the right and makes his way directly up the hill like a compass pointing always at the unchangeable north; the trees.
There should be one comma before "though" and one comma after. Comma after "concrete". Your description here is quite heavy, and it actually distracts from the verb and subject of the sentence—by the time I got past "cracked concrete", I forgot what the sentence was originally about. Reading the actual words is in a reader's short-term memory, and you can't afford to have needlessly twisted sentences (especially in the second paragraph of the whole book) that will cause them to go back and reread five times before they understand.Something catches his eye though as he moves between the labyrinth of decaying metal and cracked concrete breaking his focus.
The second sentence in this is very confusing. First of all, dashes should be written as "—", and if you can't get an em dash (what that longest dash is called) in your writing, then at the very least there should be a space before the dash you use, so the reader is sure that you're using a dash and not a hyphen (hyphens being what separate compound fragments of words; for example, "I'm not very pro-hyphen when they pop up in places that they shouldn't be"). Secondly, all dashes should be paired, either with another dash or a period, at the end of their appositive phrases, so you should have a second dash after—grass? or curiously? I can't tell where your appositive phrase ends. If the journal is peeking out curiously, it should be after "curiously", but if the book is "curiously almost begging", it should be after "grass". "Hesitated" should be "hesitates", and there should be a comma afterwards. I'm not a fan of the use of "then", and I think it would be better off as "but", relaying more of his hesitance. [Abolished words: also, obvious, then.]He stops. A small battered orange book- a journal, peeking out from in a small clump of rich, green grass curiously almost begging for him to take it with him. He hesitated then, without expression, bends down to take it.
Comma after "least"—and if he's thinking, why would he think "save him the trouble"? Shouldn't it be "save me the trouble"? Thoughts should be in italics if you intend on this being narrated inside his head, and there should be a comma after "wood" and "thought", which should be "thinks"; "was" should be "is". You've slipped into past tense! I think "comfortably and safely" would be better off not as adverbs—"in comfort and safety" might read better, as it's not so clunky.At the very least it would burn well on the fire. Save him the trouble of gathering wood he thought as it was getting too late to do so comfortably and safely.
Was should be "is"; "knelt" should be "kneels". This is a laundry list, and a font of telling over showing. Don't tell the reader he's curious—show the reader how he's resisting the urge to flip through the pages. The word "him" between "despite" and "telling" shouldn't exist, and this is... all action. Because you're telling rather than showing, this has no characterization to it whatsoever, and a reader is likely to skip over it.He wasalsovery curious at the contents despite him telling himself not to get distracted. He knelt down and put it in a small pocket at the front of his backpack.
This isn't even a sentence. It's a poorly-executed fragment—"giving" should be "gives"; "more softer- peaceful" should be "softer and more peaceful" or "softer, more peaceful" ("more softer" is extremely incorrect); there should be a comma after "it"—and again, it's more telling than showing. Show the reader how the calmness settles in his bones in the sunset, rather than the tension of the day. Show the reader something about his character, not just "the sunset was more relaxing".The orange glow of the sunset giving everything a more softer- peaceful feel to it much more relaxing than the colour of grey and rusty metal everywhere he looked.
The second sentence, again, is a confusing fragment. I think you meant for "standing" to be "stand", but I'm not a fan of it as a whole. I think "rather oddly" can be edited, "when" can be taken out, and a comma can be added before "surrounded" to make it into a proper sentence, and that turns it into description rather than the reader being informed dryly.He gets to the trees. Large thick pines standing out rather oddly when surrounded by barren farmland for miles around.
This is the second time in three sentences you've used the word "relaxing"; I think you need to find a new word. This sentence... is twisted. I think you meant to end the sentence after "night[s]", and then continue in a different sentence, "It feels", but I'm not quite sure. In any case, it's incorrect. "Except with the absence of" can be shortened to "except without the", which makes it easier to read. More words does not necessarily make something better.The sap from the trees smells fresh and relaxing and when mixed with a small campfire which he builds most night feels just like Christmas back home except with the absence of company, presents and good food.
The first sentence has no relation whatsoever to the sentences around it, except the mention of the absence of company. It doesn't make sense to have it there, and honestly, this is the point where you should break this paragraph. A paragraph should be one cohesive idea, and his loneliness has nothing to do with sweets. There should at least be a comma after "treat", and one after "camp"; "had" should be "has", and "hoped" should be "hopes". "Yesterday" isn't very effective in prose, in my experience, and it really sounds better as "the day before".He's been alone for years. He found a few sweets in one of the cars earlier on in the day which was a treat and he had some rabbit back at his camp which he had trapped yesterday. He hoped it was still there when he got back. Sweets aren't that substantial.
This is the second time in four paragraphs you've used that ending device, and if you keep using it so many times in a row, your readers are going to get very tired of it. It's also extremely incorrect, because "the rabbit" is not an independent clause, nor is it a detailed part of a list. The semicolon is useless here, and I kind of feel like you're just using it because you found that key on your keyboard and it's pretty. (Don't worry, I think semicolons are pretty, too.) We don't need "the rabbit" in this sentence, because you've already told us the literal sentence before that he's thinking about the rabbit. "Got" should be "gets"; "was" should be "is". The appositive ("just a... sleeping bag") is awkward, and I think it might come off better as "just a sleeping bag next to a small makeshift fire pit". You use the word "hanging" in some form basically twice right next to each other, and you might just want to use "hanging from the tree over the fire pit" or some variation of that.Sure enough when he got back to his camp, just a small ring of rocks where the fire would go to contain it and a sleeping bag, it was still there hanging from the tree overhanging the fire; the rabbit.
First sentence is a fragment. "Staining" should be "stains", and there should be a hyphen in "burnt-out" (possibly even "long-burnt-out"). "Settled" should be "settles". Also, why does he settle down before busying himself with a fire? Why not just jump right to the fire? He could always dump his backpack on the ground under the tree, but why would he (I'm assuming) sit and relax for a moment and then spring up to start a fire?The long burnt out fire staining the ground in the ring a charcoal black. He settled down, back to the tree, for a moment before busying himself with a fire for the night.
Possessive form of "it" is "its", no apostrophe; "it's" means "it is". "Scattering" should be "that scatters", and there should be a comma after "floor". You've already described the sunset as orange, so perhaps you could find another word? You also seem to have Adjective Syndrome, where every noun has to have an adjective attached or It's Just Not A Noun. Some of these adjectives can be cut ("orange", for example, and "good"). "Good" is one of the most useless adjectives. It doesn't actually describe anything, because it's all relative. For me, a "good" fire would be a roaring high one (maybe with some copper sulfide or something to make it blue/green) in a fireplace in the middle of winter; for someone else, a "good" fire may be a smolder in wet wood.The sun finds it's way through the thick forest in little beams of warm, orange light scattering itself across the forest floor creating complex silhouettes of the trees and leaves above as he carefully nurtures the small tinder into a good, warm fire.
You're in past tense again; "opened" should be "opens", "pulled" should be "pulls"; "read" should be "reads"; and "was" should be "is". I think there should be an "a" before "cold smoked rabbit leg", and there should be a comma after "leg". Get rid of the words "from earlier"; we were literally just there when he picked up the journal, so you don't need to remind us about it. "KEEP IT OUT" should be "KEEP OUT", and I think "his point" should be changed to "the point", because it's not exactly possible to tell the gender of someone from the name "Frankie". It could be a nickname for Franklin or Francesca, and the world would never know.While chewing on cold smoked rabbit leg he opened his brown backpack and pulled out the orange journal from earlier. It read on the front "Frankie's Journal - KEEP IT OUT" and was decorated with numerous skulls and crossbones to make his point clear.
"Seemed" should be "seem"; "child like" should be "childlike" or "child-like"; the dash after "eight" should actually be a comma, because a dash there doesn't really work, even stylistically. Also, "you"? Was this originally written in second person? I think "you just make out" should be "he can just make out", and that phrase makes no sense because it's already been repeatedly stated that the journal is orange. If it was barely discernable as being orange, why would it be described as orange in the first place, and not a beaten tan or faded beige?The drawings and writing seemed to be child like around the age of eight- maybe nine. The cover is incredibly dirty but you just make out a faded orange colour.
"Also too"? Eliminate both of those; they're made redundant by the very word "similar". [Abolished words: also, obvious, then, very, too.] There should be a comma after "altogether", and the comma after "decay" would actually work stylistically as a dash. You have two sentences in a row starting with "The pages are"; the second one should be "they are" or "they're", because our subject was established in the previous sentence.The pages are also too in a similar state. The pages are mostly ripped or gone altogether but it doesn't look like decay, more like the pages were ripped clean out in anger.
The first sentence makes little sense, but more if you were originally writing this in second person (the "you" viewpoint). It might work better as "Flipping through the book, he sees that some are still intact". Again, "child like" should be "childlike" or "child-like"; "thought" should be "thinks". I think the phrase "once he runs out of twigs" is superfluous, and the sentence could end at "fire" and still get the same meaning across. The last sentence is more anticlimactic than anything else; suggested improvement?:Flicking through the book shows that some are still intact. The writing is neat and round like but still obviously child like. The man thought he might as well read through what pages are left before he burns it for the fire once he runs out of twigs. He starts at the beginning of "Frankie's Journal":
He thumbs to the first intact page, which is smudged with old ink but still legible, and starts reading.
end quibbles (for the first section)
Points: 50
Reviews: 425
Donate