hey,
this poem reminded me of a poem by Dean Young in his book title Skid. unfortunately I can't remember the title of the poem and I don't have access to the book right now as it's 3000 miles away in Alaska. what I can say is that the poem has a kind of floating, otherworldly feel to it like your poem does. if you'd like I'll try to send you a link to it if I can find it online. it would be good for you to read as an example of how to get the most out of that type of voice.
my biggest suggestion for revision is to make this poem as specific as possible. the language was fanciful, but there wasn't much in terms of concrete imagery. poetry is most effective when it has texture, when it appeals to our senses. and in order to do that you need to avoid abstractions.
also the rhyming. not really sure how I feel about it. my opinion of rhyme in poetry is that, unless it is strictly metered it should be buried in the line. meaning keep the rhyming words but don't use them in the line breaks. consider breaking the poem up into smaller stanzas, tiny little morsels with just three or four words to each line and two or three lines per stanza. the result would be a softer, more even-tempered voice with which you could include a little hint of malice. read some of Charles Simic's work as an example.
let me know if you have any questions and keep writing.
Points: 5401
Reviews: 72
Donate