User avatar

~Excalibur~

  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Ban Gay Marriage

    Incand. I have already made a legal response to this though, and while I don't expect you to have read every post going back and forth, I must point out ...

    Jun 4, 2009
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Ban Gay Marriage

    Rubric There was no constitutional definition of marriage! So you cannot violate what does not exist. Still domestic partnerships and civil unions are allowed, but they are not called marriage. ...

    May 29, 2009
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Ban Gay Marriage

    I think you're misinterpreting what I'm saying. The word is irrelevant; why can they not just have the word "marriage"? Like I said, Christians aren't the only religion to allow ...

    May 27, 2009
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Ban Gay Marriage

    California upheld the decision today, as I knew they would. "I look at it like this: If you have nothing against atheist marriages, you have no right to argue against ...

    May 27, 2009
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Skinny Images in the Media

    There are awareness groups and activist groups for these things. Much like how our local Amnesty group picks certain topic areas and causes to rally behind, perhaps you should organize ...

    May 27, 2009
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Skinny Images in the Media

    Not all men are immune from its claws... especially the gay and metro communities. All metro are essenitially entrapped by it, while a gay man definately has the sterotype, but ...

    May 25, 2009
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Ban Gay Marriage

    Flemzo, again. You take an origin of a word which is not the current meaning of a word for your proof. You speak nothing of the afforded protections and that ...

    May 24, 2009
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Ban Gay Marriage

    Still wrong as ever. Just because marriage is synoumous with religious rites, did I EVER state that is was owned by Christianity? No. Since most Americans who worship are, I ...

    May 23, 2009
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Ban Gay Marriage

    Rubric, no. By having a definition to make it a legal matter, defining MARRIAGE as between one man and one woman does NOT mean same sex couples can't be joined ...

    May 22, 2009
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Abortions

    If a male wants an abortion, then just make it happen? Exalibur, how exactly would that happen, might I ask? So, a male doesn't want the baby, but the woman ...

    May 21, 2009
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Skinny Images in the Media

    You cannot take away that right though. Those publishers have a right to do as they see fit. If that is their set of beauty, then let them be like ...

    May 21, 2009
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Ban Gay Marriage

    Since the above post was so long, I am making a double post to summerize those of you who just went. "Tldr." The rights of same-sex couples exist by law ...

    May 21, 2009
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Ban Gay Marriage

    Yes, I am not on firefox. So I apologize for mistakes... Without my conventional spell checker and in my condition, it is difficult for me at this time. Points to ...

    May 21, 2009
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Abortions

    I respect your points, Sabrina. I pretty much concur with everything you say. Also, if abortion is to be banned, who stops a woman from having a baby? Would male ...

    May 20, 2009
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Ban Gay Marriage

    People need to understand state and church better before they voice their arguements. State and church are luckily seperate, but the border between them is crossed all to easy. Marriage ...

    May 20, 2009


Never forget how special this site is: the older I get, the more I realize how many lonely writers there are who have only family and maybe some friends to read their works. The fact we get free critique, nightly writing pads, free contests and unlimited interaction at *no cost* with people genuinely wanting to help, can not be overstated or overrated
— Messenger