User avatar

Rubric

  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: How Much can we trust science?

    If the scientific method is obeyed to a stringent degree, it is almost impossible for bias to find its way into final results. Examples of methods include double blinds on ...

    Jul 11, 2008
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Global Warming

    I'll respond to this later tonight in full, but having followed your third link Minerva, I can say that there is a fair bit of bias in your sources. The ...

    Jul 10, 2008
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: The Bible: Literal or Allegory?

    Ah yes Khfan, but the bible also says the earth was fixed immovable in the sky; whereas science tells us that the earth orbits around the sun. If protecting the ...

    Jul 9, 2008
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: The Bible: Literal or Allegory?

    One of the problems with the semi-literal/allegorical interpretation is that ongoing themes in the Bible don't really allow it. I'm not certain of this argument, but this is roughly how ...

    Jul 9, 2008
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: American English: Dialect or Language?

    An interesting theoretical example for evolution in and of itself... But yes they clearly belong to the same subset. People just get a little confused by the obvious ties of ...

    Jul 8, 2008
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: The Bible: Literal or Allegory?

    The parting of the red sea (and the plagues before it)is one that's got me interested, because there are egyptian records of these events as well as rabbinical records that ...

    Jul 7, 2008
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: The Bible: Literal or Allegory?

    Rei I hope "scientific explanations" doesn't include the worlds in collision theory, because personally I'm more inclined to believe in the fifteen-foot-tall-wizard-living-under-a-mountain-who-doesn't

    Jul 6, 2008
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: The Bible: Literal or Allegory?

    It seems to me that anything in the Bible is only as unproveable as anything else. We determine the truth of other theories from ancient time periods, why not here? ...

    Jul 6, 2008
  • Randomosity Re: The 'In Your Pants' Game

    Never again in your pants. For the "in bed" addition, "except in bed" can work just as well :P: yes snow patrol are quite the awesome :P. Rubric

    Jul 3, 2008
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Gun Laws

    Thanks for pointing out my mistake Brad, though it is rather immaterial to the point I was trying to make. Because something is in the Bill Of Rights would similarly ...

    Jul 3, 2008
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Gun Laws

    Gah I got the stats from an article which was part of our philosophy course. It turns out that the site which usually has the information is down during my ...

    Jul 2, 2008
  • Randomosity Re: The 'In Your Pants' Game

    Set fire to the third bar in your pants. Hands open, in your pants

    Jul 2, 2008
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Gun Laws

    Ah yes thunderdude but the means of getting guns illegally would be drastically reduced. If I recall correctly I've already been involved in this debate on this forum, but I'm ...

    Jul 2, 2008
  • Randomosity Re: The 'In Your Pants' Game

    Like only a woman your pants

    Jul 2, 2008
  • Randomosity Re: Dogs warn of us of danger...

    I stand in awe, that's some pretty intense sniff-ability

    Jun 30, 2008


I'm getting nachos~
— BluesClues