QiGuaiGongFu

Hence the warning. This still belongs in the poetry forum.

No, but if you had, then Im sure somebody in MOMA would have found it artistic.

IF, art is not based on the spontinaity of life, and in no world is art based on computation and planning, then you have said that art does not, and ...

That was a conjecture based on what you said. Your argument leads irreverably to that point.

If you couldn't get that out of what I said, then your not as smart as you would have us believe.

You're intellectualizing again, you can't do that with art. if art isn't the urge, and it CERTAINLY isn't sitting down and thinking about it, then we've exausted our options, art ...

the urge to paint something constitues art, and i dont see a difference.

I would rather have seen it get locked - but I only started the thread- who am I complain right? I FELT like writing it, that's why.

Because you're being unreasonable. We'd still BE on topic if you hadn't come around and complained about nothing. thanks for that.

We are discussing my poem, thank you. Lay off.

Metrical composition doesn't mean a composition with a beat, that would be lyrics.

Poetry is what you make of it. and youve got 4 years before you go to college, and old english is annoying.

True, but you've done a bad job at defining it, and havent said anything that is necesarily true.

Your still thinking too much about it. Art has nothing to do with tradition. If it did, it would never change. We'd still be looking at stick pictures of bison ...

well, obviously you have a poor sense as to what art is.