-
Re: Too Darn Hot
CL-- Just a thought: people come together because they have a common enemy. I share the same taste in nuts as many, many people do; that doesn't mean we have ...
Dec 10, 2006 -
Re: Praise vs. Encouragement
Snoinkums-- Fortunately, we are not critics. Critics exist for published work, fortunately enough for us. We are mentors. And this is why I have "repeat[ed] it in sixteen different threads ...
Dec 10, 2006 -
Re: Praise vs. Encouragement
Sureal, A critic's role is not to offer support. It is to point out where a piece needs work and, if the critic so pleases, how that might be accomplished. ...
Dec 10, 2006 -
Re: Praise vs. Encouragement
Grif & lillizard: I was unaware we are also a site for emotional counseling. The site is here for young writers to congregate--this is obvious. What is not so obvious ...
Dec 9, 2006 -
Re: Praise vs. Encouragement
Snoinkuddy-- Relevance? It's not that I think you've said something false--I'm just wondering how your response exactly addresses the issues in my first post. I assume you're trying to insinuate ...
Dec 3, 2006 -
Re: Praise vs. Encouragement
Snoink-- This is sort of an ongoing struggle. We're not an affirmation board. We are a writing board--nothing more, nothing less. We are, in a sense, all desperately trying to ...
Dec 3, 2006 -
Re: To Be or Not To Be...Constructive?
Snoink-- The words "positive" and "negative" are completely arbitrary, defined by the recipient of the critique. So therefore, writing about "positive" reviews vs. "negative" reviews is pointless, whi
Dec 1, 2006 -
Re: To Be or Not To Be...Constructive?
Snoink-- Perhaps so, but I think you should address the points I make instead of my basis for making them. Best, brad
Dec 1, 2006 -
Re: To Be or Not To Be...Constructive?
Snoink-- What would you suggest to rename it, since the best phraseology I can come up with is being "positive" versus being "negative"? It would probably help alleviate a lot ...
Dec 1, 2006 -
Re: To Be or Not To Be...Constructive?
Poor Imp-- Where we differ is in what you consider "positive." I don't think "positive" or "negative" ought to have any bearing on a critique. People too often personalize criticism, ...
Nov 30, 2006 -
Re: To Be or Not To Be...Constructive?
Poor Imp-- This recent push to be positive is based on the assumption that balance means better. I simply can't agree; any response that responds to the work in question ...
Nov 29, 2006 -
Re: Difficulty on Perspective
Poor Imp -- Piers stumbled through Transport’s myriad pathways, side-turns, pavements marked fadingly in numbers. Trans vo. 170 wound east, back turn blind. Huh? Back turn blind? He avoided it, ...
Nov 29, 2006 -
Re: Critiquing Critiques
Snoinkums-- I also think (as has been mentioned countless times) that it's silly to argue with people who critique your poem or when you have, as they say down here ...
Nov 29, 2006 -
Re: What of Criticism? What of Poetry?
The question is on the table: how does one properly criticize a poem? The question has been responded to many times and will, for at least another millenia (or until ...
Nov 29, 2006 -
Re: Paper or Plastic?
From time to time on one Internet poetry board or another, a swirl of commiserative ill-will erupts among slighted 'Internet poets'. Invariably, a print journal has been more dismissive of ...
Nov 25, 2006
