User avatar

Incandescence

  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: The War in Iraq/ 9 11

    You can claim, "We were right!" That still doesn't make it a valid argument or proposition for what we should do at current.

    Jul 25, 2005
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: The War in Iraq/ 9 11

    Sure, but not the way you keep nagging on and on about. There were no WMDs? Okay, sure. So what do you want us to do? Pull out NOW?

    Jul 24, 2005
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Abortion

    I didn't say the process was convenient, did I? I said it was undertaken for convenience. Really, I don't care what your Aunt says, because there is a Nurse Practitioner ...

    Jul 24, 2005
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Abortion

    If I can make a distinction: survival through eating is not the same as murder for convenience.

    Jul 24, 2005
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: My reply to Qi and Sabradan on the London Bombers

    There is an interesting book out I recently finished entitled, "Homo Sacer: Sovereign Life and Living" by Giorgio Agamben. His thesis is that the Middle East will only stop beinnnng ...

    Jul 23, 2005
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Christian Debate and Discussion

    If you want a true critique of Christianity, go read Bertrand Russel's "Why I am not a Christian."

    Jul 23, 2005
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Abortion

    No, Qi, I don't eat anything that's alive. I'm a vegetarian for certain reasons that are unexplainable (in a rational, sane way); however, I do not fault others for being ...

    Jul 23, 2005
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: The War in Iraq/ 9 11

    Hindsight is good for critiquing future actions -- not the current situation.

    Jul 23, 2005
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: The War in Iraq/ 9 11

    Which is why the UN was totally absent in Rwanda, huh? 1.) You are arguing after-the-fact. One thing I've noticed about the modern liberal: they love hindsight. What's happened has ...

    Jul 23, 2005
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Abortion

    A jellyfish, too. But this is still besides the point: without DNA, there is no life. The problem is not determining when life begins, but when it is okay to ...

    Jul 23, 2005
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: (Marxian) Communism

    Marx is to Capitalism as Lacan is to Freud: they are revisionists. Marx did not escape the Capitalist ideal. What he did, instead, was take the fantasmatic spectre of capitalism ...

    Jul 23, 2005
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Abortion

    Neither is your skin. It's only 'alive' because of the other neurons and such that inhibit its growth. Still, I don't see you hacking it off when it just becomes ...

    Jul 23, 2005
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: (Marxian) Communism

    If you're looking through the lens of practica, it's useless. We've never seen gravity - it's a theory - so then talking about it and using it as a force ...

    Jul 23, 2005
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: (Marxian) Communism

    I did not say he was wrong -- I said it was irrelevant: insofar as this topic has a direct idea desperately needing to be discussed. SO to make sure ...

    Jul 23, 2005
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: (Marxian) Communism

    I did not say analyze Communist theory versus Communist practica. Please don't veer off-topic, as Number 1 reveals nothing about the difference and Number 2 is completely irrelevant. Further, money ...

    Jul 23, 2005


When I use caps I do not want you to read it like a little screech, I want you to read it like a 5,000 year old ogre with the strength of 10,000 men.
— avianwings47