Incandescence

Ah, some healthy criticism. Yes, we do need limits-- for rapists, and murders and other CRIMINALS. However, homosexuals have done nothing illegal, unless of course they are in Texas. So ...

Firefox rocks.

Yes, agreed. Let's not get off-topic.

Yes, especially the latter of the two. However, for my own benefit, and for those who will read my arguments in the future, please, what is "professional mumbo jumbo"? I ...

Well, Qi, because I only read the first part of your last post, let me apologize for sounding too "professional." Heaven forbid, after all, this is only a debate.

For future reference, if you are not going to read an entire argument, do not criticize it, lest you want to look foolish in the eyes of others.

I agree with Crysi.

The Left does not understand the far-reaching implications of legalizing gay marriage. Where do we stop? What, then, is also okay, if we are to permit what was considered taboo ...

i got a 48.

The reality of the matter is this: unless the doctor is a sadomasochist, he won't help a patient commit suicide. The legal liability of such an act, and the legal ...

Heh. Know that I do.

As per your request, I erased the poem and moved the topic.

I'm (duh) conservative, but the Republican party is not the party that I would have admired 20 years ago.

Point in case: assisted suicide is not an option because there is always the possibility of a cure or a "miracle" (much as I detest the word). I spoke with ...

Tara and I are both schizo! might be bad to have some characteristics in common with me, though. Take it as a backhanded compliment, I s'pose.