User avatar

Incandescence

  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Gender Norms and Stereotypes

    A more interesting point might be: why would anyone WANT the difference between men and women to vanish? After all, once it's gone, we're just an androgyny of desire and ...

    Feb 25, 2008
  • Lounge, The Re: Firestarter (President of British Operations) Moves On

    Jaaaaaack... I've known you since we were wee teenagers, and I've had the singular experience and pleasure of watching you--and, at least in some way, the reciprocal: of being watched ...

    Feb 25, 2008
  • Randomosity Re: I had a really weird dream about YWS the other night.

    Well, I think Suz is just being a big poo-head about the whole ordeal. :P

    Feb 24, 2008
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Existence of God

    Now, just so this is clear, I am a staunch atheist. That said, I support bubbles on this issue for the most part, but I'd like to mention the fact ...

    Feb 11, 2008
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: 08' Presidential Elections

    Volant, Your comment about Obama attacking Hillary isn't looked down upon because it's a survival mechanism--otherwise he would collapse under Hillary's war machine which began an assault on him back ...

    Feb 11, 2008
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Nuclear weapons

    Rubric, Epistemology is always-already biased--the fact that you can speak to our epistemology as somehow different than yours connotes a bias of your own. It gets no one anywhere to ...

    Feb 9, 2008
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Nuclear weapons

    Errant, You have constructed an example without working out the details or deriving an end result. You have not "disproved" anything by doing so, and cleverly leaving the details to ...

    Jan 30, 2008
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Nuclear weapons

    Errant, You're quick to dismiss game theory, so I'm going to ask that you explain, in your own words, what game theory is. It's also worth noting that the Wiki ...

    Jan 30, 2008
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Nuclear weapons

    Errant, Your absolute ignorance of game theory has rendered this discussion absurd. Game theory is not in the least about making war like a video game, or creating virtual realities ...

    Jan 29, 2008
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Nuclear weapons

    Errant, Perhaps you should take a serious course in mathematics (such as Analysis) before telling me whether or not Game Theory applies to the situation. You're throwing up red herrings ...

    Jan 29, 2008
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: 08' Presidential Elections

    Smorgishborg, Meep, et. al. -- I believe the concern over Obama's refusal of doing simple symbolic things such as wearing a lapel are founded on very serious concerns. It's true ...

    Jan 28, 2008
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Nuclear weapons

    Errant, "Game Theory and Strategy," Philip D. Strafin. "American Cold War Strategy," Ernest R. May. Those are two sources which support my comments. You say it isn't revealed--what about the ...

    Jan 27, 2008
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Nuclear weapons

    R.J.-- Precisely! Nuclear weapons will exterminate vasts amount of innocent civilians--thus if a country's dictator is being threatened with the use of nuclear force, he'll first have to convince his ...

    Jan 27, 2008
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Nuclear weapons

    R. J.-- HIV (along with cancer) is one of the viruses currently under heavy engineering to see if it can be made airborm, and many of the preliminary tests have ...

    Jan 26, 2008
  • Serious Discussion and Debate Re: Nuclear weapons

    Nuclear holocaust is not really a viable reality these days, after all. Once a nuclear weapon has been used, the area itself must be quarantined for a large amount of ...

    Jan 26, 2008


Every time our next guest is here, all of our lives are seriously in danger.
— David Letterman